132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33011348)
21. Surfactant Cocktail-Aided Extraction/Precipitation/On-Pellet Digestion Strategy Enables Efficient and Reproducible Sample Preparation for Large-Scale Quantitative Proteomics.
Shen S; An B; Wang X; Hilchey SP; Li J; Cao J; Tian Y; Hu C; Jin L; Ng A; Tu C; Qu M; Zand MS; Qu J
Anal Chem; 2018 Sep; 90(17):10350-10359. PubMed ID: 30078316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Consecutive proteolytic digestion in an enzyme reactor increases depth of proteomic and phosphoproteomic analysis.
Wiśniewski JR; Mann M
Anal Chem; 2012 Mar; 84(6):2631-7. PubMed ID: 22324799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Sensitivity of mass spectrometry analysis depends on the shape of the filtration unit used for filter aided sample preparation (FASP).
Lipecka J; Chhuon C; Bourderioux M; Bessard MA; van Endert P; Edelman A; Guerrera IC
Proteomics; 2016 Jul; 16(13):1852-7. PubMed ID: 27219663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Filter-Aided Sample Preparation (FASP) for Improved Proteome Analysis of Recombinant Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells.
Coleman O; Henry M; Clynes M; Meleady P
Methods Mol Biol; 2017; 1603():187-194. PubMed ID: 28493131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Proteomic Profile of EPS-Urine through FASP Digestion and Data-Independent Analysis.
Prestagiacomo LE; Gabriele C; Morelli P; Rota MA; Alba S; Cuda G; Damiano R; Gaspari M
J Vis Exp; 2021 May; (171):. PubMed ID: 34028441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Technical report: In-gel sample preparation prior to proteomic analysis of bovine faeces increases protein identifications by removal of high molecular weight glycoproteins.
Huang Y; Burchmore R; Jonsson NN; Johnson PCD; Eckersall PD
J Proteomics; 2022 Jun; 261():104573. PubMed ID: 35351658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Optimization and comparison of bottom-up proteomic sample preparation for early-stage Xenopus laevis embryos.
Peuchen EH; Sun L; Dovichi NJ
Anal Bioanal Chem; 2016 Jul; 408(17):4743-9. PubMed ID: 27137514
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Surfactant and Chaotropic Agent Assisted Sequential Extraction/On-Pellet Digestion (SCAD) for Enhanced Proteomics.
Ma F; Liu F; Xu W; Li L
J Proteome Res; 2018 Aug; 17(8):2744-2754. PubMed ID: 29923408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Datasets: Sensitivity and protein digestion course of proteomic Filter Aided Sample Preparation.
Wiśniewski JR; Zettl K
Data Brief; 2019 Oct; 26():104530. PubMed ID: 31667293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Ultrasonic-Based Filter Aided Sample Preparation as the General Method to Sample Preparation in Proteomics.
Carvalho LB; Capelo-Martínez JL; Lodeiro C; Wiśniewski JR; Santos HM
Anal Chem; 2020 Jul; 92(13):9164-9171. PubMed ID: 32484334
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Membrane-Based SDS Depletion Ahead of Peptide and Protein Analysis by Mass Spectrometry.
Unterlander N; Doucette AA
Proteomics; 2018 May; 18(9):e1700025. PubMed ID: 29575800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of detergent-based sample preparation workflows for LTQ-Orbitrap analysis of the Escherichia coli proteome.
Tanca A; Biosa G; Pagnozzi D; Addis MF; Uzzau S
Proteomics; 2013 Sep; 13(17):2597-607. PubMed ID: 23784971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. S-Trap, an Ultrafast Sample-Preparation Approach for Shotgun Proteomics.
HaileMariam M; Eguez RV; Singh H; Bekele S; Ameni G; Pieper R; Yu Y
J Proteome Res; 2018 Sep; 17(9):2917-2924. PubMed ID: 30114372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Comparison of Sample Preparation Methods for Shotgun Proteomic Studies in Aquaculture Species.
Araújo MJ; Sousa ML; Felpeto AB; Turkina MV; Fonseca E; Martins JC; Vasconcelos V; Campos A
Proteomes; 2021 Nov; 9(4):. PubMed ID: 34842808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. iFASP: combining isobaric mass tagging with filter-aided sample preparation.
McDowell GS; Gaun A; Steen H
J Proteome Res; 2013 Aug; 12(8):3809-12. PubMed ID: 23692318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. GASP and FASP are Complementary for LC-MS/MS Proteomic Analysis of Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes and Transporters in Pig Liver.
Howard M; Achour B; Al-Majdoub Z; Rostami-Hodjegan A; Barber J
Proteomics; 2018 Dec; 18(24):e1800200. PubMed ID: 30371990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. SP3 Protocol for Proteomic Plant Sample Preparation Prior LC-MS/MS.
Mikulášek K; Konečná H; Potěšil D; Holánková R; Havliš J; Zdráhal Z
Front Plant Sci; 2021; 12():635550. PubMed ID: 33777071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Well-Plate μFASP for Proteomic Analysis of Single Pancreatic Islets.
Sandbaumhüter FA; Nezhyva M; Eriksson O; Engberg A; Kreuger J; Andrén PE; Jansson ET
J Proteome Res; 2022 Apr; 21(4):1167-1174. PubMed ID: 35293755
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of sample preparation methods for mass spectrometry-based proteomic analysis of barley leaves.
Wang WQ; Jensen ON; Møller IM; Hebelstrup KH; Rogowska-Wrzesinska A
Plant Methods; 2018; 14():72. PubMed ID: 30159003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. A Comparison of Bottom-Up Proteomic Sample Preparation Methods for the Human Parasite
Mayr AL; Hummel K; Leitsch D; Razzazi-Fazeli E
ACS Omega; 2024 Feb; 9(8):9782-9791. PubMed ID: 38434803
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
