These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33011384)

  • 1. Development, content validation, and reliability of the Assessment of Real-World Observational Studies (ArRoWS) critical appraisal tool.
    Coles B; Tyrer F; Hussein H; Dhalwani N; Khunti K
    Ann Epidemiol; 2021 Mar; 55():57-63.e15. PubMed ID: 33011384
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Development and Evaluation of the Algorithm CErtaInty Tool (ACE-IT) to Assess Electronic Medical Record and Claims-based Algorithms' Fit for Purpose for Safety Outcomes.
    Singh S; Beyrer J; Zhou X; Swerdel J; Harvey RA; Hornbuckle K; Russo L; Ghauri K; Abi-Elias IH; Cox JS; Rodriguez-Watson C
    Drug Saf; 2023 Jan; 46(1):87-97. PubMed ID: 36396894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development and validation of a quality appraisal tool for validity studies (QAVALS).
    Gore S; Goldberg A; Huang MH; Shoemaker M; Blackwood J
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2021 May; 37(5):646-654. PubMed ID: 31246154
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The GRACE checklist for rating the quality of observational studies of comparative effectiveness: a tale of hope and caution.
    Dreyer NA; Velentgas P; Westrich K; Dubois R
    J Manag Care Spec Pharm; 2014 Mar; 20(3):301-8. PubMed ID: 24564810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The Evidence Project risk of bias tool: assessing study rigor for both randomized and non-randomized intervention studies.
    Kennedy CE; Fonner VA; Armstrong KA; Denison JA; Yeh PT; O'Reilly KR; Sweat MD
    Syst Rev; 2019 Jan; 8(1):3. PubMed ID: 30606262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The development and validation of a meta-tool for quality appraisal of public health evidence: Meta Quality Appraisal Tool (MetaQAT).
    Rosella L; Bowman C; Pach B; Morgan S; Fitzpatrick T; Goel V
    Public Health; 2016 Jul; 136():57-65. PubMed ID: 26993202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A systematic review of the content of critical appraisal tools.
    Katrak P; Bialocerkowski AE; Massy-Westropp N; Kumar S; Grimmer KA
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2004 Sep; 4():22. PubMed ID: 15369598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The REal Life EVidence AssessmeNt Tool (RELEVANT): development of a novel quality assurance asset to rate observational comparative effectiveness research studies.
    Campbell JD; Perry R; Papadopoulos NG; Krishnan J; Brusselle G; Chisholm A; Bjermer L; Thomas M; van Ganse E; van den Berge M; Quint J; Price D; Roche N
    Clin Transl Allergy; 2019; 9():21. PubMed ID: 30962876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Whiting P; Rutjes AW; Dinnes J; Reitsma J; Bossuyt PM; Kleijnen J
    Health Technol Assess; 2004 Jun; 8(25):iii, 1-234. PubMed ID: 15193208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validity and reliability of the Turkish version of the Optimality Index-US (OI-US) to assess maternity care outcomes.
    Yucel C; Taskin L; Low LK
    Midwifery; 2015 Dec; 31(12):1135-42. PubMed ID: 26299370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Development of the Home Cooking EnviRonment and Equipment Inventory Observation form (Home-CookERI
    Schönberg S; Asher R; Stewart S; Fenwick MJ; Ashton L; Bucher T; Van der Horst K; Oldmeadow C; Collins CE; Shrewsbury VA
    Nutrients; 2020 Jun; 12(6):. PubMed ID: 32575912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of the RTI item bank on risk of bias and precision of observational studies.
    Viswanathan M; Berkman ND
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Feb; 65(2):163-78. PubMed ID: 21959223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a quality assessment tool for systematic reviews of observational studies (QATSO) of HIV prevalence in men having sex with men and associated risk behaviours.
    Wong WC; Cheung CS; Hart GJ
    Emerg Themes Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 5():23. PubMed ID: 19014686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Clinical instruments: reliability and validity critical appraisal.
    Brink Y; Louw QA
    J Eval Clin Pract; 2012 Dec; 18(6):1126-32. PubMed ID: 21689217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Content validation of a Critical Appraisal Tool for Reviewing Analgesia Studies (CATRAS) involving subjects incapable of self-reporting pain.
    Warne LN; Schug SA; Beths T; Brondani JT; Carter JE; Lascelles BDX; Raisis AL; Robertson SA; Steagall PVM; Taylor PM; Whittem T; Bauquier SH
    Pain Rep; 2018; 3(4):e670. PubMed ID: 30123860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The measurement of collaboration within healthcare settings: a systematic review of measurement properties of instruments.
    Walters SJ; Stern C; Robertson-Malt S
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2016 Apr; 14(4):138-97. PubMed ID: 27532315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The PEDro scale had acceptably high convergent validity, construct validity, and interrater reliability in evaluating methodological quality of pharmaceutical trials.
    Yamato TP; Maher C; Koes B; Moseley A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2017 Jun; 86():176-181. PubMed ID: 28288916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. NUQUEST-NUtrition QUality Evaluation Strengthening Tools: development of tools for the evaluation of risk of bias in nutrition studies.
    Kelly SE; Greene-Finestone LS; Yetley EA; Benkhedda K; Brooks SPJ; Wells GA; MacFarlane AJ
    Am J Clin Nutr; 2022 Jan; 115(1):256-271. PubMed ID: 34605544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of standardized training on the reliability of the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool: a prospective study.
    da Costa BR; Beckett B; Diaz A; Resta NM; Johnston BC; Egger M; Jüni P; Armijo-Olivo S
    Syst Rev; 2017 Mar; 6(1):44. PubMed ID: 28253938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Development of the Quality Improvement Minimum Quality Criteria Set (QI-MQCS): a tool for critical appraisal of quality improvement intervention publications.
    Hempel S; Shekelle PG; Liu JL; Sherwood Danz M; Foy R; Lim YW; Motala A; Rubenstein LV
    BMJ Qual Saf; 2015 Dec; 24(12):796-804. PubMed ID: 26311020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.