These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33011527)

  • 1. The rational continued influence of misinformation.
    Connor Desai SA; Pilditch TD; Madsen JK
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104453. PubMed ID: 33011527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Vaccination against misinformation: The inoculation technique reduces the continued influence effect.
    Buczel KA; Szyszka PD; Siwiak A; Szpitalak M; Polczyk R
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(4):e0267463. PubMed ID: 35482715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Sensitivity to misinformation retractions in the continued influence paradigm: Evidence for stability.
    McIlhiney P; Gignac GE; Weinborn M; Ecker UK
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Jul; 75(7):1259-1271. PubMed ID: 34541938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Executive function and the continued influence of misinformation: A latent-variable analysis.
    McIlhiney P; Gignac GE; Ecker UKH; Kennedy BL; Weinborn M
    PLoS One; 2023; 18(4):e0283951. PubMed ID: 37018324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring factors that mitigate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Kan IP; Pizzonia KL; Drummey AB; Mikkelsen EJV
    Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2021 Nov; 6(1):76. PubMed ID: 34837587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Can you believe it? An investigation into the impact of retraction source credibility on the continued influence effect.
    Ecker UKH; Antonio LM
    Mem Cognit; 2021 May; 49(4):631-644. PubMed ID: 33452666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Examining the role of information integration in the continued influence effect using an event segmentation approach.
    Sanderson JA; Farrell S; Ecker UKH
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(7):e0271566. PubMed ID: 35849610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of discomfort in the continued influence effect of misinformation.
    Susmann MW; Wegener DT
    Mem Cognit; 2022 Feb; 50(2):435-448. PubMed ID: 34533754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Mechanisms in continued influence: The impact of misinformation corrections on source perceptions.
    Westbrook V; Wegener DT; Susmann MW
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Aug; 51(6):1317-1330. PubMed ID: 36988856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Correcting false information in memory: manipulating the strength of misinformation encoding and its retraction.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Swire B; Chang D
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Jun; 18(3):570-8. PubMed ID: 21359617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Explicit warnings reduce but do not eliminate the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Tang DT
    Mem Cognit; 2010 Dec; 38(8):1087-100. PubMed ID: 21156872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dependencies in evidential reports: The case for informational advantages.
    Pilditch TD; Hahn U; Fenton N; Lagnado D
    Cognition; 2020 Nov; 204():104343. PubMed ID: 32599310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Correcting statistical misinformation about scientific findings in the media: Causation versus correlation.
    Irving D; Clark RWA; Lewandowsky S; Allen PJ
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2022 Mar; 28(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 35007097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. From Probability to Consilience: How Explanatory Values Implement Bayesian Reasoning.
    Wojtowicz Z; DeDeo S
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2020 Dec; 24(12):981-993. PubMed ID: 33198908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. How Attitudes Impact the Continued Influence Effect of Misinformation: The Mediating Role of Discomfort.
    Susmann MW; Wegener DT
    Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2023 May; 49(5):744-757. PubMed ID: 35227114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The perceived dilution of causal strength.
    Stephan S; Engelmann N; Waldmann MR
    Cogn Psychol; 2023 Feb; 140():101540. PubMed ID: 36527775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of source expertise and trustworthiness on recollection: the case of vaccine misinformation.
    Pluviano S; Della Sala S; Watt C
    Cogn Process; 2020 Aug; 21(3):321-330. PubMed ID: 32333126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Bayesian rationality in evaluating multiple testimonies: incorporating the role of coherence.
    Harris AJ; Hahn U
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Sep; 35(5):1366-73. PubMed ID: 19686030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Do people keep believing because they want to? Preexisting attitudes and the continued influence of misinformation.
    Ecker UK; Lewandowsky S; Fenton O; Martin K
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Feb; 42(2):292-304. PubMed ID: 24005789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Inductive reasoning 2.0.
    Hayes BK; Heit E
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2018 May; 9(3):e1459. PubMed ID: 29283506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.