These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

170 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33011632)

  • 1. Perception of beef quality for Spanish and Brazilian consumers.
    Boito B; Lisbinski E; Campo MDM; Guerrero A; Resconi V; de Oliveira TE; Barcellos JOJ
    Meat Sci; 2021 Feb; 172():108312. PubMed ID: 33011632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Consumer perception of health properties and of other attributes of beef as determinants of consumption and purchase decisions.
    Gutkowska K; Czarnecki J; Głąbska D; Guzek D; Batóg A
    Rocz Panstw Zakl Hig; 2018; 69(4):413-419. PubMed ID: 30525333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Where's the beef? Retail channel choice and beef preferences in Argentina.
    Colella F; Ortega DL
    Meat Sci; 2017 Nov; 133():86-94. PubMed ID: 28662454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An Exploratory Study of the Purchase and Consumption of Beef: Geographical and Cultural Differences between Spain and Brazil.
    Magalhaes DR; Maza MT; Prado IND; Fiorentini G; Kirinus JK; Campo MDM
    Foods; 2022 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 35010255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Factors associated with consumer perception and conduct toward certified beef from Brazil.
    Brunoro JRP; Lopes MA; Demeu FA; Bruhn FRP; Rigueira LL; Faria PB; Rocha CMBMD; Contini E; Pacheco EO; Maia ÉM; Junqueira LV
    J Food Sci; 2020 May; 85(5):1542-1547. PubMed ID: 32271959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of beef eating quality by Irish consumers.
    McCarthy SN; Henchion M; White A; Brandon K; Allen P
    Meat Sci; 2017 Oct; 132():118-124. PubMed ID: 28522169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Mexican consumers at the point of meat purchase. Beef choice.
    Ngapo TM; Braña Varela D; Rubio Lozano MS
    Meat Sci; 2017 Dec; 134():34-43. PubMed ID: 28750333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
    Ardeshiri A; Sampson S; Swait J
    Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.
    Merlino VM; Borra D; Girgenti V; Dal Vecchio A; Massaglia S
    Meat Sci; 2018 Sep; 143():119-128. PubMed ID: 29738962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Valuation of observable attributes in differentiated beef products in Chile using the hedonic price method.
    Fernández J; Melo O; Larraín R; Fernández M
    Meat Sci; 2019 Dec; 158():107881. PubMed ID: 31301889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
    Sonoda Y; Oishi K; Chomei Y; Hirooka H
    Meat Sci; 2018 Dec; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analyzing the importance of attributes for Brazilian consumers to replace conventional beef with cultured meat.
    de Oliveira GA; Domingues CHF; Borges JAR
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251432. PubMed ID: 33961686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of European beef: 2. Demographic factors have only minor effects on consumer scores and willingness to pay.
    Bonny SPF; Gardner GE; Pethick DW; Allen P; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Hocquette JF
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1399-1411. PubMed ID: 28190414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Influence of quality labels on the formation of preferences of lamb meat consumers. A Spanish case study.
    Bernabéu R; Rabadán A; El Orche NE; Díaz M
    Meat Sci; 2018 Jan; 135():129-133. PubMed ID: 28968556
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in the Current Patterns of Beef Consumption and Consumer Behavior Trends-Cross-Cultural Study Brazil-Spain-Turkey.
    Magalhaes DR; Çakmakçı C; Campo MDM; Çakmakçı Y; Makishi F; Silva VLDS; Trindade MA
    Foods; 2023 Jan; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 36766003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Untrained consumer assessment of the eating quality of beef: 1. A single composite score can predict beef quality grades.
    Bonny SPF; Hocquette JF; Pethick DW; Legrand I; Wierzbicki J; Allen P; Farmer LJ; Polkinghorne RJ; Gardner GE
    Animal; 2017 Aug; 11(8):1389-1398. PubMed ID: 27829474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An overview on production, consumer perspectives and quality assurance schemes of beef in Mexico.
    Parra-Bracamonte GM; Lopez-Villalobos N; Morris ST; Vázquez-Armijo JF
    Meat Sci; 2020 Dec; 170():108239. PubMed ID: 32682175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Consumer perception of marbling and beef quality during purchase and consumer preferences for degree of doneness.
    Benli H; Yildiz DG
    Anim Biosci; 2023 Aug; 36(8):1274-1284. PubMed ID: 37170519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G; Corsi AM; Casini L; Contini C; Loose SM
    Appetite; 2016 Jan; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH; Gentz M; Altmann B; Meier-Dinkel L
    Appetite; 2018 Aug; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.