155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33012442)
1. Comparison of nerve conduction parameters in canine studies using recording needle and surface electrodes.
Crespo V; Liebel FX; Harcourt-Brown T
Vet J; 2020 Oct; 264():105534. PubMed ID: 33012442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diaphragm motor responses to phrenic nerve stimulation in ALS: Surface and needle recordings.
de Carvalho M; Pinto S; Swash M
Clin Neurophysiol; 2018 Feb; 129(2):349-353. PubMed ID: 29288990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Selective anterior interosseous nerve conduction study: Coaxial needle versus surface electrode recordings.
Seror P
Neurophysiol Clin; 2017 Sep; 47(4):315-321. PubMed ID: 28736099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Needle electromyography: Basic concepts.
Rubin DI
Handb Clin Neurol; 2019; 160():243-256. PubMed ID: 31277852
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The effect of the tarsal joint positions on the tibial nerve motor action potential latency in dog: electrophysiological and anatomical studies.
Turan E; Bolukbasi O; Omeroglu A
Dtsch Tierarztl Wochenschr; 2007 Jan; 114(1):20-4. PubMed ID: 17252932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of the reference electrode on CMAP configuration: leg nerve observations and an alternative reference site.
Brashear A; Kincaid JC
Muscle Nerve; 1996 Jan; 19(1):63-7. PubMed ID: 8538671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Suprascapular nerve conduction: a comparative analysis in normal subjects.
Casazza BA; Young JL; Press JP; Heinemann AW
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1998; 38(3):153-60. PubMed ID: 9637941
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Nerve conduction studies in lower limb of elite Nepalese football players: an insight into neural adaptations.
Sharma D; Paudel BH; Khadka R; Thakur D; Shah DK; Sapkota NK; Yadav RL; Yadav PK
J Sports Med Phys Fitness; 2017 Mar; 57(3):313-318. PubMed ID: 26842865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Which nerve conduction parameters can predict spontaneous electromyographic activity in carpal tunnel syndrome?
Chang CW; Lee WJ; Liao YC; Chang MH
Clin Neurophysiol; 2013 Nov; 124(11):2264-8. PubMed ID: 23763989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of reference electrode position on the compound muscle action potential.
Nandedkar SD; Barkhaus PE
Clin Neurophysiol; 2020 Jan; 131(1):160-166. PubMed ID: 31794957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel technique for recording from the serratus anterior.
Depalma MJ; Pease WS; Johnson EW; Kadyan V
Arch Phys Med Rehabil; 2005 Jan; 86(1):17-20. PubMed ID: 15640983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Relationship between the size of the recording electrodes and morphology of the compound muscle action potentials.
Wee AS; Ashley RA
Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1990; 30(3):165-8. PubMed ID: 2351092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fibular motor nerve conduction studies: Investigating the mechanism for compound muscle action potential amplitude drop with proximal stimulation.
Kamel JT; Knight-Sadler RJ; Roberts LJ
Muscle Nerve; 2015 Dec; 52(6):993-6. PubMed ID: 25846267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [The effect of surface area of active recording electrode to CMAP parameters].
Chang H; Chan RC; Hsu TC
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi (Taipei); 1993 Jun; 51(6):419-24. PubMed ID: 8281488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of concentric needle versus hooked-wire electrodes in the canine larynx.
Jaffe DM; Solomon NP; Robinson RA; Hoffman HT; Luschei ES
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1998 May; 118(5):655-62. PubMed ID: 9591865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tibial motor nerve conduction studies: an investigation into the mechanism for amplitude drop of the proximal evoked response.
Barkhaus PE; Kincaid JC; Nandedkar SD
Muscle Nerve; 2011 Nov; 44(5):776-82. PubMed ID: 22006693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Uni- and bipolar surface recording of human nerve responses.
Winkler T; Stålberg E; Haas LF
Muscle Nerve; 1991 Feb; 14(2):133-41. PubMed ID: 2000104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Motor unit analysis. Comparison between concentric and monopolar electrodes.
Pease WS; Bowyer BL
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1988 Feb; 67(1):2-6. PubMed ID: 3345237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the type of electrode affect the electromyoneurographic parameters in rats?1.
Somensi DN; Teixeira RKC; Feijó DH; Loureiro KD; Valente AL; Carvalho LTF; Calvo FC; Santos DRD; Barros RSM
Acta Cir Bras; 2019 Mar; 34(3):e201900304. PubMed ID: 30892390
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intramuscular recording in neurodiagnostic studies.
Maryniak O; Yaworski R; Hayes KC
Am J Phys Med Rehabil; 1989 Aug; 68(4):186-91. PubMed ID: 2765211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
