These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33013538)

  • 1. A Semi-supervised Learning Method for Q-Matrix Specification Under the DINA and DINO Model With Independent Structure.
    Wang W; Song L; Ding S; Wang T; Gao P; Xiong J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2120. PubMed ID: 33013538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A Semi-supervised Learning-Based Diagnostic Classification Method Using Artificial Neural Networks.
    Xue K; Bradshaw LP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():618336. PubMed ID: 33551928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.
    Oka M; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):302-331. PubMed ID: 36097246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An EM-Based Method for Q-Matrix Validation.
    Wang W; Song L; Ding S; Meng Y; Cao C; Jie Y
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Sep; 42(6):446-459. PubMed ID: 30787487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using machine learning to improve Q-matrix validation.
    Qin H; Guo L
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Mar; 56(3):1916-1935. PubMed ID: 37231327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Q-Matrix Estimation Methods for Cognitive Diagnosis Models: Based on Partial Known Q-Matrix.
    Wang D; Cai Y; Tu D
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020 Apr; ():1-13. PubMed ID: 32308032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Adaptive Design for Item Parameter Online Estimation and Q-Matrix Online Calibration in CD-CAT.
    Wang W; Tu Y; Song L; Zheng J; Wang T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():710497. PubMed ID: 34504460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Statistical Analysis of
    Chen Y; Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015; 110(510):850-866. PubMed ID: 26294801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Data-driven Q-matrix learning based on Boolean matrix factorization in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Xiong J; Luo Z; Luo G; Yu X
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):638-667. PubMed ID: 35578396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Consistency Theory for the General Nonparametric Classification Method.
    Chiu CY; Köhn HF
    Psychometrika; 2019 Sep; 84(3):830-845. PubMed ID: 30725333
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured.
    Akbay L; de la Torre J
    Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 31954425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Q-Matrix Refinement Based on Item Fit Statistic RMSEA.
    Kang C; Yang Y; Zeng P
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Oct; 43(7):527-542. PubMed ID: 31534288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Theorems and Methods of a Complete Q Matrix With Attribute Hierarchies Under Restricted Q-Matrix Design.
    Cai Y; Tu D; Ding S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1413. PubMed ID: 30135672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Hypothesis Testing of the Q-matrix.
    Gu Y; Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 29998451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
    Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):491-511. PubMed ID: 29795830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. An empirical Q-matrix validation method for the sequential generalized DINA model.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Feb; 73(1):142-163. PubMed ID: 30723890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. DINA Models for Multiple-Choice Items With Few Parameters: Considering Incorrect Answers.
    Ozaki K
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2015 Sep; 39(6):431-447. PubMed ID: 29881017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.