296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33014149)
1. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on interventions for osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional study.
Wu IX; Wang H; Zhu L; Chen Y; Wong CH; Mao C; Chung VC
Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis; 2020; 12():1759720X20959967. PubMed ID: 33014149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for depression: a cross-sectional study.
Chung VCH; Wu XY; Feng Y; Ho RST; Wong SYS; Threapleton D
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci; 2018 Dec; 27(6):619-627. PubMed ID: 28462754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for Alzheimer's disease: a cross-sectional study.
Zhong CCW; Zhao J; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Mao C; Yeung JWF; Chung VCH
Alzheimers Res Ther; 2022 Oct; 14(1):159. PubMed ID: 36309725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Low methodological quality of systematic reviews on acupuncture: a cross-sectional study.
Ho L; Ke FYT; Wong CHL; Wu IXY; Cheung AKL; Mao C; Chung VCH
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2021 Oct; 21(1):237. PubMed ID: 34717563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis on Asthma Treatments. A Cross-Sectional Study.
Wu IXY; Deng Y; Wang H; Chen Y; Wong CHL; Chung VCH
Ann Am Thorac Soc; 2020 Aug; 17(8):949-957. PubMed ID: 32383967
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on treatments for osteoporosis: A cross-sectional study.
Tsoi AKN; Ho LTF; Wu IXY; Wong CHL; Ho RST; Lim JYY; Mao C; Lee EKP; Chung VCH
Bone; 2020 Oct; 139():115541. PubMed ID: 32730932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on Chinese herbal medicine: a methodological survey.
Cheung AKL; Wong CHL; Ho L; Wu IXY; Ke FYT; Chung VCH
BMC Complement Med Ther; 2022 Feb; 22(1):48. PubMed ID: 35197038
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Methodological Quality and Risk of Bias of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses on Stem Cells for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Cross-Sectional Survey.
Liu A; Yu W; Chen J; Guo T; Niu P; Feng H; Jia Y
Stem Cells Dev; 2022 Aug; 31(15-16):431-444. PubMed ID: 35316077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Abstract analysis method facilitates filtering low-methodological quality and high-bias risk systematic reviews on psoriasis interventions.
Gómez-García F; Ruano J; Aguilar-Luque M; Alcalde-Mellado P; Gay-Mimbrera J; Hernández-Romero JL; Sanz-Cabanillas JL; Maestre-López B; González-Padilla M; Carmona-Fernández PJ; García-Nieto AV; Isla-Tejera B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Dec; 17(1):180. PubMed ID: 29284417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Most systematic reviews reporting adherence to AMSTAR 2 had critically low methodological quality: a cross-sectional meta-research study.
Bojcic R; Todoric M; Puljak L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2024 Jan; 165():111210. PubMed ID: 37931822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Methodological quality and risk of bias in orthodontic systematic reviews using AMSTAR and ROBIS.
Hooper EJ; Pandis N; Cobourne MT; Seehra J
Eur J Orthod; 2021 Oct; 43(5):544-550. PubMed ID: 33723612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of methodological quality rating of systematic reviews on neuropathic pain using AMSTAR and R-AMSTAR.
Dosenovic S; Jelicic Kadic A; Vucic K; Markovina N; Pieper D; Puljak L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 May; 18(1):37. PubMed ID: 29739339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Methodological quality of systematic reviews on sepsis treatments: A cross-sectional study.
Ho L; Chen X; Kwok YL; Wu IXY; Mao C; Chung VCH
Am J Emerg Med; 2024 Mar; 77():21-28. PubMed ID: 38096636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A systematic assessment of Cochrane reviews and systematic reviews published in high-impact medical journals related to cancer.
Goldkuhle M; Narayan VM; Weigl A; Dahm P; Skoetz N
BMJ Open; 2018 Mar; 8(3):e020869. PubMed ID: 29581210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. An Overview of Systematic Reviews of Moxibustion for Knee Osteoarthritis.
Yin S; Zhu F; Li Z; Che D; Li L; Feng J; Zhang L; Huo Z
Front Physiol; 2022; 13():822953. PubMed ID: 35185621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of AMSTAR to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews in overviews of reviews of healthcare interventions.
Pollock M; Fernandes RM; Hartling L
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Mar; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 28335734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Quality assessment of systematic reviews on total hip or knee arthroplasty using mod-AMSTAR.
Wu X; Sun H; Zhou X; Wang J; Li J
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2018 Mar; 18(1):30. PubMed ID: 29548276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reporting and Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses of Nursing Interventions in Patients With Alzheimer's Disease: General Implications of the Findings.
Sun X; Zhou X; Zhang Y; Liu H
J Nurs Scholarsh; 2019 May; 51(3):308-316. PubMed ID: 30806019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methodological quality and risk-of-bias assessments in systematic reviews of treatments for peri-implantitis.
Hasuike A; Ueno D; Nagashima H; Kubota T; Tsukune N; Watanabe N; Sato S
J Periodontal Res; 2019 Aug; 54(4):374-387. PubMed ID: 30671962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Use of AMSTAR-2 in the methodological assessment of systematic reviews: protocol for a methodological study.
Lu C; Lu T; Ge L; Yang N; Yan P; Yang K
Ann Transl Med; 2020 May; 8(10):652. PubMed ID: 32566589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
