These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33014282)

  • 1. PREDICTION OF PIVOTAL RESPONSE TREATMENT OUTCOME WITH TASK FMRI USING RANDOM FOREST AND VARIABLE SELECTION.
    Zhuang J; Dvornek NC; Li X; Yang D; Ventola P; Duncan JS
    Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging; 2018 Apr; 2018():97-100. PubMed ID: 33014282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prediction of severity and treatment outcome for ASD from fMRI.
    Zhuang J; Dvornek NC; Li X; Ventola P; Duncan JS
    Predict Intell Med; 2018 Sep; 11121():9-17. PubMed ID: 32984867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing the accuracy and stability of variable selection methods for random forest modeling in ecology.
    Fox EW; Hill RA; Leibowitz SG; Olsen AR; Thornbrugh DJ; Weber MH
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Jul; 189(7):316. PubMed ID: 28589457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Estimating the Growing Stem Volume of Coniferous Plantations Based on Random Forest Using an Optimized Variable Selection Method.
    Jiang F; Kutia M; Sarkissian AJ; Lin H; Long J; Sun H; Wang G
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Dec; 20(24):. PubMed ID: 33348807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Random generalized linear model: a highly accurate and interpretable ensemble predictor.
    Song L; Langfelder P; Horvath S
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Jan; 14():5. PubMed ID: 23323760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. PREDICTION OF TREATMENT OUTCOME FOR AUTISM FROM STRUCTURE OF THE BRAIN BASED ON SURE INDEPENDENCE SCREENING.
    Zhuang J; Dvornek NC; Zhao Q; Li X; Ventola P; Duncan JS
    Proc IEEE Int Symp Biomed Imaging; 2019 Apr; 2019():404-408. PubMed ID: 32256966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Random forests for feature selection in QSPR Models - an application for predicting standard enthalpy of formation of hydrocarbons.
    Teixeira AL; Leal JP; Falcao AO
    J Cheminform; 2013 Feb; 5(1):9. PubMed ID: 23399299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A Comparison of Random Forest Variable Selection Methods for Classification Prediction Modeling.
    Speiser JL; Miller ME; Tooze J; Ip E
    Expert Syst Appl; 2019 Nov; 134():93-101. PubMed ID: 32968335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of variable selection methods for random forests and omics data sets.
    Degenhardt F; Seifert S; Szymczak S
    Brief Bioinform; 2019 Mar; 20(2):492-503. PubMed ID: 29045534
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Brain response pattern identification of fMRI data using a particle swarm optimization-based approach.
    Ma X; Chou CA; Sayama H; Chaovalitwongse WA
    Brain Inform; 2016 Sep; 3(3):181-192. PubMed ID: 27747594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of variable selection methods for clinical predictive modeling.
    Sanchez-Pinto LN; Venable LR; Fahrenbach J; Churpek MM
    Int J Med Inform; 2018 Aug; 116():10-17. PubMed ID: 29887230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Improved sparse decomposition based on a smoothed L0 norm using a Laplacian kernel to select features from fMRI data.
    Zhang C; Song S; Wen X; Yao L; Long Z
    J Neurosci Methods; 2015 Apr; 245():15-24. PubMed ID: 25681758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Explaining heterogeneity of individual treatment causal effects by subgroup discovery: An observational case study in antibiotics treatment of acute rhino-sinusitis.
    Qi W; Abu-Hanna A; van Esch TEM; de Beurs D; Liu Y; Flinterman LE; Schut MC
    Artif Intell Med; 2021 Jun; 116():102080. PubMed ID: 34020753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Distributed Intrinsic Functional Connectivity Patterns Predict Diagnostic Status in Large Autism Cohort.
    Jahedi A; Nasamran CA; Faires B; Fan J; Müller RA
    Brain Connect; 2017 Oct; 7(8):515-525. PubMed ID: 28825309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Assessing soil pH in Anhui Province based on different features mining methods combined with generalized boosted regression models].
    Wang SH; Lu HL; Zhao MS; Zhou LM
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2020 Oct; 31(10):3509-3517. PubMed ID: 33314841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Voxel selection framework in multi-voxel pattern analysis of FMRI data for prediction of neural response to visual stimuli.
    Chou CA; Kampa K; Mehta SH; Tungaraza RF; Chaovalitwongse WA; Grabowski TJ
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2014 Apr; 33(4):925-34. PubMed ID: 24710161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A comparative investigation of modern feature selection and classification approaches for the analysis of mass spectrometry data.
    Gromski PS; Xu Y; Correa E; Ellis DI; Turner ML; Goodacre R
    Anal Chim Acta; 2014 Jun; 829():1-8. PubMed ID: 24856395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Unbiased split variable selection for random survival forests using maximally selected rank statistics.
    Wright MN; Dankowski T; Ziegler A
    Stat Med; 2017 Apr; 36(8):1272-1284. PubMed ID: 28088842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Minimal Patient Clinical Variables to Accurately Predict Stress Echocardiography Outcome: Validation Study Using Machine Learning Techniques.
    Bennasar M; Banks D; Price BA; Kardos A
    JMIR Cardio; 2020 May; 4(1):e16975. PubMed ID: 32469316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.