These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33014418)

  • 1. How female × male and male × male interactions influence competitive fertilization in
    Lüpold S; Reil JB; Manier MK; Zeender V; Belote JM; Pitnick S
    Evol Lett; 2020 Oct; 4(5):416-429. PubMed ID: 33014418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How multivariate ejaculate traits determine competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lüpold S; Manier MK; Berben KS; Smith KJ; Daley BD; Buckley SH; Belote JM; Pitnick S
    Curr Biol; 2012 Sep; 22(18):1667-72. PubMed ID: 22840512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Female mediation of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Lüpold S; Pitnick S; Berben KS; Blengini CS; Belote JM; Manier MK
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2013 Jun; 110(26):10693-8. PubMed ID: 23757499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rapid diversification of sperm precedence traits and processes among three sibling Drosophila species.
    Manier MK; Belote JM; Berben KS; Lüpold S; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Evolution; 2013 Aug; 67(8):2348-62. PubMed ID: 23888856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An integrative view of sexual selection in Tribolium flour beetles.
    Fedina TY; Lewis SM
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2008 May; 83(2):151-71. PubMed ID: 18429767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Resolving mechanisms of competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Manier MK; Belote JM; Berben KS; Novikov D; Stuart WT; Pitnick S
    Science; 2010 Apr; 328(5976):354-7. PubMed ID: 20299550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Complex interactions with females and rival males limit the evolution of sperm offence and defence.
    Bjork A; Starmer WT; Higginson DM; Rhodes CJ; Pitnick S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2007 Jul; 274(1619):1779-88. PubMed ID: 17507332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Precopulatory but not postcopulatory male reproductive traits diverge in response to mating system manipulation in
    Wensing KU; Koppik M; Fricke C
    Ecol Evol; 2017 Dec; 7(23):10361-10378. PubMed ID: 29238561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sperm in competition: not playing by the numbers.
    Snook RR
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2005 Jan; 20(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 16701340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Directional postcopulatory sexual selection revealed by artificial insemination.
    Evans JP; Zane L; Francescato S; Pilastro A
    Nature; 2003 Jan; 421(6921):360-3. PubMed ID: 12540898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Postcopulatory sexual selection generates speciation phenotypes in Drosophila.
    Manier MK; Lüpold S; Belote JM; Starmer WT; Berben KS; Ala-Honkola O; Collins WF; Pitnick S
    Curr Biol; 2013 Oct; 23(19):1853-62. PubMed ID: 24076241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of correlated responses in key ejaculatory traits to artificial selection on a diversifying secondary sexual trait.
    Tyler F; Haverkos S; Imm A; Polak M
    J Insect Physiol; 2021; 133():104291. PubMed ID: 34364848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Condition-dependent interaction between mating success and competitive fertilization success in Drosophila melanogaster.
    De Nardo AN; Roy J; Sbilordo SH; Lüpold S
    Evolution; 2021 Aug; 75(8):2014-2026. PubMed ID: 33834478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Costs and benefits of giant sperm and sperm storage organs in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Zajitschek S; Zajitschek F; Josway S; Al Shabeeb R; Weiner H; Manier MK
    J Evol Biol; 2019 Nov; 32(11):1300-1309. PubMed ID: 31465604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15.
    McDonough-Goldstein CE; Pitnick S; Dorus S
    Proc Biol Sci; 2022 Feb; 289(1968):20212213. PubMed ID: 35105240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resolving mechanisms of short-term competitive fertilization success in the red flour beetle.
    Droge-Young EM; Belote JM; Perez GS; Pitnick S
    J Insect Physiol; 2016; 93-94():1-10. PubMed ID: 27343847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Delineating the roles of males and females in sperm competition.
    Evans JP; Rosengrave P; Gasparini C; Gemmell NJ
    Proc Biol Sci; 2013 Dec; 280(1772):20132047. PubMed ID: 24266039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Positive genetic covariance between male sexual ornamentation and fertilizing capacity.
    Polak M; Hurtado-Gonzales JL; Benoit JB; Hooker KJ; Tyler F
    Curr Biol; 2021 Apr; 31(7):1547-1554.e5. PubMed ID: 33567290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Sexual selection for genetic compatibility: the role of the major histocompatibility complex on cryptic female choice in Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha).
    Gessner C; Nakagawa S; Zavodna M; Gemmell NJ
    Heredity (Edinb); 2017 May; 118(5):442-452. PubMed ID: 28051059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The sexually-selected sperm hypothesis: sex-biased inheritance and sexual antagonism.
    Pizzari T; Birkhead TR
    Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc; 2002 May; 77(2):183-209. PubMed ID: 12056746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.