214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33014777)
1. The Role of
Tu X; Zhang C; Liu Z; Shen G; Wu X; Nie L; Chang T; Xu H; Bao Y; Yang L; Wei Q
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():1365. PubMed ID: 33014777
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can Negative Prostate-specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Avoid the Need for Pelvic Lymph Node Dissection in Newly Diagnosed Prostate Cancer Patients? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis with Backup Histology as Reference Standard.
Stabile A; Pellegrino A; Mazzone E; Cannoletta D; de Angelis M; Barletta F; Scuderi S; Cucchiara V; Gandaglia G; Raggi D; Necchi A; Karakiewicz P; Montorsi F; Briganti A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2022 Feb; 5(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 34538770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. How accurate is
Erdem S; Simsek DH; Degirmenci E; Aydin R; Bagbudar S; Ozluk Y; Sanli Y; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Urol Oncol; 2022 Jan; 40(1):6.e1-6.e9. PubMed ID: 34400066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. 18 F-prostate specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computerized tomography for lymph node staging in medium/high risk prostate cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Lv Z; Song L; Wang M; Hou H; Li H; Wang X; Wang J; Wang J; Liu M
Chin Med J (Engl); 2024 Apr; 137(8):949-958. PubMed ID: 37690993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes of Primary Lymph Node Staging of Intermediate and High Risk Prostate Cancer with
Yaxley JW; Raveenthiran S; Nouhaud FX; Samartunga H; Yaxley AJ; Coughlin G; Delahunt B; Egevad L; McEwan L; Wong D
J Urol; 2019 Apr; 201(4):815-820. PubMed ID: 30672842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6.
Herlemann A; Wenter V; Kretschmer A; Thierfelder KM; Bartenstein P; Faber C; Gildehaus FJ; Stief CG; Gratzke C; Fendler WP
Eur Urol; 2016 Oct; 70(4):553-557. PubMed ID: 26810345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7.
von Eyben FE; Picchio M; von Eyben R; Rhee H; Bauman G
Eur Urol Focus; 2018 Sep; 4(5):686-693. PubMed ID: 28753806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prospective evaluation of 68Gallium-prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography/computed tomography for preoperative lymph node staging in prostate cancer.
van Leeuwen PJ; Emmett L; Ho B; Delprado W; Ting F; Nguyen Q; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2017 Feb; 119(2):209-215. PubMed ID: 27207581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A Comparative Study of
Gupta M; Choudhury PS; Hazarika D; Rawal S
World J Nucl Med; 2017; 16(3):186-191. PubMed ID: 28670175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Diagnostic Efficacy of (68)Gallium-PSMA Positron Emission Tomography Compared to Conventional Imaging for Lymph Node Staging of 130 Consecutive Patients with Intermediate to High Risk Prostate Cancer.
Maurer T; Gschwend JE; Rauscher I; Souvatzoglou M; Haller B; Weirich G; Wester HJ; Heck M; Kübler H; Beer AJ; Schwaiger M; Eiber M
J Urol; 2016 May; 195(5):1436-1443. PubMed ID: 26682756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Head-to-Head Comparison of
Wang X; Wen Q; Zhang H; Ji B
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():737989. PubMed ID: 34745959
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pelvic lymph node dissection for nodal oligometastatic prostate cancer detected by 68Ga-PSMA-positron emission tomography/computerized tomography.
Hijazi S; Meller B; Leitsmann C; Strauss A; Meller J; Ritter CO; Lotz J; Schildhaus HU; Trojan L; Sahlmann CO
Prostate; 2015 Dec; 75(16):1934-40. PubMed ID: 26356236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13.
Zhou J; Wu R; Wang W; Zhao Y; Liu X
Hell J Nucl Med; 2022; 25(3):297-311. PubMed ID: 36576728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of
Ling SW; de Jong AC; Schoots IG; Nasserinejad K; Busstra MB; van der Veldt AAM; Brabander T
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2021 Nov; 33():61-71. PubMed ID: 34632423
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of gallium-68 prostate-specific membrane antigen positron-emission tomography for detecting lymph node metastases in primary and recurrent prostate cancer and location of recurrence after radical prostatectomy: an overview of the current literature.
Luiting HB; van Leeuwen PJ; Busstra MB; Brabander T; van der Poel HG; Donswijk ML; Vis AN; Emmett L; Stricker PD; Roobol MJ
BJU Int; 2020 Feb; 125(2):206-214. PubMed ID: 31680398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic Performance of Radiolabeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography for Primary Lymph Node Staging in Newly Diagnosed Intermediate to High-Risk Prostate Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Kim SJ; Lee SW; Ha HK
Urol Int; 2019; 102(1):27-36. PubMed ID: 30269140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic Accuracy of
Cantiello F; Gangemi V; Cascini GL; Calabria F; Moschini M; Ferro M; Musi G; Butticè S; Salonia A; Briganti A; Damiano R
Urology; 2017 Aug; 106():139-145. PubMed ID: 28438628
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Performance of
Wu H; Xu T; Wang X; Yu YB; Fan ZY; Li DX; Luo L; Yang XC; Jiao W; Niu HT
World J Mens Health; 2020 Apr; 38(2):208-219. PubMed ID: 31081294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Gallium-68-prostate-specific membrane antigen (
van Leeuwen PJ; Donswijk M; Nandurkar R; Stricker P; Ho B; Heijmink S; Wit EMK; Tillier C; van Muilenkom E; Nguyen Q; van der Poel HG; Emmett L
BJU Int; 2019 Jul; 124(1):62-68. PubMed ID: 30074667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Feasibility and Optimal Time Point of [
Huebner N; Rasul S; Baltzer P; Clauser P; Hermann Grubmüller K; Mitterhauser M; Hacker M; Heidenreich A; Rajwa P; Fajkovic H; Shariat SF; Grubmüller B
Eur Urol Open Sci; 2022 Jun; 40():117-124. PubMed ID: 35638090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
