221 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33015154)
1. Validation of a Vaginal Birth after Cesarean Delivery Prediction Model in Teaching Hospitals of Addis Ababa University: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Misgan E; Gedefaw A; Negash S; Asefa A
Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():1540460. PubMed ID: 33015154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. French validation and adaptation of the Grobman nomogram for prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Haumonte JB; Raylet M; Christophe M; Mauviel F; Bertrand A; Desbriere R; d'Ercole C
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2018 Mar; 47(3):127-131. PubMed ID: 29229362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Factors associated with success of vaginal birth after one caesarean section (VBAC) at three teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a case control study.
Birara M; Gebrehiwot Y
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2013 Feb; 13():31. PubMed ID: 23374116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. External validation of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery calculator in Israeli cohort of parturients and construction of an improved model.
Haggiag N; Eitan S; Maor-Sagie E; Hallak M; Gabbay-Benziv R
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2023 Apr; 161(1):182-189. PubMed ID: 36066199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Validation of the Grobman model for successful vaginal birth after cesarean section in Jordanian women.
Rawashdeh H; Aljalodi H; Shamleh RA; Alshorman S; AboShindi H; Awawdeh S
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2023 Jan; 23(1):49. PubMed ID: 36670392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simplifying the prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery: role of the cervical exam.
Oakes MC; Hensel DM; Kelly JC; Rampersad R; Carter EB; Cahill AG; Raghuraman N
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2022 Dec; 35(25):10030-10035. PubMed ID: 35723653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mid-trimester cervical length and prediction of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese parturients: A retrospective study.
Liu G; Zhou C; Wang S; Zhang H
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2023 Nov; 52(9):102647. PubMed ID: 37611746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation of a vaginal birth after cesarean delivery prediction model in women with two prior cesarean deliveries.
Metz TD; Allshouse AA; Faucett AM; Grobman WA
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Apr; 125(4):948-952. PubMed ID: 25751218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Predicting vaginal birth after caesarean section: Validation of the Grobman model in a New Zealand population.
Windsor RS; Clark HE; Blasingame JLJ
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Oct; 62(5):658-663. PubMed ID: 35342928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicting the chance of vaginal delivery after one cesarean section: validation and elaboration of a published prediction model.
Fagerberg MC; Maršál K; Källén K
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2015 May; 188():88-94. PubMed ID: 25801723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Validation of updated antenatal vaginal birth after caesarean section prediction model without race and ethnicity in Australia.
Liu CZ; Mahomed K
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2023 Jun; 63(3):314-320. PubMed ID: 36259468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Influencing factors and antenatal assessment of the vaginal birth after cesarean section].
Guo N; Bai RM; Qu PF; Huang P; He YP; Wang CL; Mi Y
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Jun; 54(6):369-374. PubMed ID: 31262120
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery.
Costantine MM; Fox K; Byers BD; Mateus J; Ghulmiyyah LM; Blackwell S; Hankins GDV; Grobman WA; Saade G
Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Nov; 114(5):1029-1033. PubMed ID: 20168103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Development and Validation of Predictive Models for Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in China.
Bi S; Zhang L; Chen J; Huang L; Zeng S; Jia J; Wen S; Cao Y; Wang S; Xu X; Ling F; Zhao X; Zhao Y; Zhu Q; Qi H; Zhang L; Li H; Du L; Wang Z; Chen D
Med Sci Monit; 2020 Dec; 26():e927681. PubMed ID: 33270607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prediction of successful trial of labor after cesarean - the benefit of prior vaginal delivery.
Ashwal E; Wertheimer A; Aviram A; Wiznitzer A; Yogev Y; Hiersch L
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016; 29(16):2665-70. PubMed ID: 26399162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Verification a model of predicting vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Chinese pregnant women.
Xu P; Feng Y; Shen H; Luo J; Tao Y
Medicine (Baltimore); 2019 Dec; 98(52):e18421. PubMed ID: 31876717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Are prediction models for vaginal birth after cesarean accurate?
Harris BS; Heine RP; Park J; Faurot KR; Hopkins MK; Rivara AJ; Kemeny HR; Grotegut CA; Jelovsek JE
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):492.e1-492.e7. PubMed ID: 30716285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Role of ante-partum ultrasound in predicting vaginal birth after cesarean section: A prospective cohort study.
Rizzo G; Bitsadze V; Khizroeva J; Mappa I; Makatsariya A; Liberati M; D'Antonio F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2021 Jan; 256():385-390. PubMed ID: 33279807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Validation of the prediction model for success of vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in Japanese women.
Yokoi A; Ishikawa K; Miyazaki K; Yoshida K; Furuhashi M; Tamakoshi K
Int J Med Sci; 2012; 9(6):488-91. PubMed ID: 22927774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Understanding Factors Leading to Primary Cesarean Section and Vaginal Birth After Cesarean Delivery in the Friuli-Venezia Giulia Region (North-Eastern Italy), 2005-2015.
Cegolon L; Mastrangelo G; Maso G; Dal Pozzo G; Ronfani L; Cegolon A; Heymann WC; Barbone F
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):380. PubMed ID: 31941963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
