BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33015334)

  • 1. Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Causada-Calo NS; Gonzalez-Moreno EI; Bishay K; Shorr R; Dube C; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Rostom A; Walsh C; Anderson JT; Keswani RN; Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1321-E1331. PubMed ID: 33015334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bishay K; Causada-Calo N; Scaffidi MA; Walsh CM; Anderson JT; Rostom A; Dube C; Keswani RN; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Shorr R; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Nov; 92(5):1030-1040.e9. PubMed ID: 32330506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training interventions to improve adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lim S; Hammond S; Park J; Hochman D; Lê ML; Rabbani R; Abou-Setta A; Zarychanski R
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):3870-3882. PubMed ID: 31595401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association Between Endoscopist Specialty and Colonoscopy Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazurek M; Murray A; Heitman SJ; Ruan Y; Antoniou SA; Boyne D; Murthy S; Baxter NN; Datta I; Shorr R; Ma C; Swain MG; Hilsden RJ; Brenner DR; Forbes N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Sep; 20(9):1931-1946. PubMed ID: 34450297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association Between Endoscopist Annual Procedure Volume and Colonoscopy Quality: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Forbes N; Boyne DJ; Mazurek MS; Hilsden RJ; Sutherland RL; Pader J; Ruan Y; Shaheen AA; Wong C; Lamidi M; Lorenzetti DL; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Sep; 18(10):2192-2208.e12. PubMed ID: 32240836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of efficacy of colonoscopy between the morning and afternoon: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wu J; Zhao SB; Wang SL; Fang J; Xia T; Su XJ; Xu C; Li ZS; Bai Y
    Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Jul; 50(7):661-667. PubMed ID: 29776746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-Term Follow-Up of Colonoscopy Quality Monitoring.
    Patel F; Dilly C; Fayad N; Marri S; Eckert GJ; Kahi C
    Clin Transl Gastroenterol; 2023 Sep; 14(9):e00608. PubMed ID: 37436181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review with meta-analysis: impact of one-handed vs. two-handed technique on quality outcomes of colonoscopy.
    Imperatore N; De Palma GD; Dolce P; Grassano A; Caporaso N; Rispo A
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Sep; 23(17):7663-7673. PubMed ID: 31539159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Boregowda U; Desai M; Nutalapati V; Paleti S; Olyaee M; Rastogi A
    Ann Gastroenterol; 2021; 34(2):214-223. PubMed ID: 33654362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
    Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative Effects of Endoscopists' Fatigue on Colonoscopy Quality on 34,022 Screening Colonoscopies.
    Dong Z; Wang J; Chen Y; Sun H; Li B; Zhang Q; Sun K; Wang Z; Qian X; Zhan T; Jiang Y; Xu S
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2021 Sep; 30(3):358-365. PubMed ID: 34551036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
    Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications.
    Bannert C; Reinhart K; Dunkler D; Trauner M; Renner F; Knoflach P; Ferlitsch A; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1837-48. PubMed ID: 23147522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.