These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33015334)

  • 1. Educational interventions are associated with improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Causada-Calo NS; Gonzalez-Moreno EI; Bishay K; Shorr R; Dube C; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Rostom A; Walsh C; Anderson JT; Keswani RN; Scaffidi MA; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Endosc Int Open; 2020 Oct; 8(10):E1321-E1331. PubMed ID: 33015334
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Quality indicators for screening colonoscopy and colonoscopist performance and the subsequent risk of interval colorectal cancer: a systematic review.
    Lund M; Trads M; Njor SH; Erichsen R; Andersen B
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2019 Nov; 17(11):2265-2300. PubMed ID: 31188154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Associations between endoscopist feedback and improvements in colonoscopy quality indicators: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Bishay K; Causada-Calo N; Scaffidi MA; Walsh CM; Anderson JT; Rostom A; Dube C; Keswani RN; Heitman SJ; Hilsden RJ; Shorr R; Grover SC; Forbes N
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2020 Nov; 92(5):1030-1040.e9. PubMed ID: 32330506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Training interventions to improve adenoma detection rates during colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lim S; Hammond S; Park J; Hochman D; Lê ML; Rabbani R; Abou-Setta A; Zarychanski R
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Sep; 34(9):3870-3882. PubMed ID: 31595401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Association Between Endoscopist Specialty and Colonoscopy Quality: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mazurek M; Murray A; Heitman SJ; Ruan Y; Antoniou SA; Boyne D; Murthy S; Baxter NN; Datta I; Shorr R; Ma C; Swain MG; Hilsden RJ; Brenner DR; Forbes N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2022 Sep; 20(9):1931-1946. PubMed ID: 34450297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Association Between Endoscopist Annual Procedure Volume and Colonoscopy Quality: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Forbes N; Boyne DJ; Mazurek MS; Hilsden RJ; Sutherland RL; Pader J; Ruan Y; Shaheen AA; Wong C; Lamidi M; Lorenzetti DL; Brenner DR; Heitman SJ
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2020 Sep; 18(10):2192-2208.e12. PubMed ID: 32240836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of efficacy of colonoscopy between the morning and afternoon: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wu J; Zhao SB; Wang SL; Fang J; Xia T; Su XJ; Xu C; Li ZS; Bai Y
    Dig Liver Dis; 2018 Jul; 50(7):661-667. PubMed ID: 29776746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Long-Term Follow-Up of Colonoscopy Quality Monitoring.
    Patel F; Dilly C; Fayad N; Marri S; Eckert GJ; Kahi C
    Clin Transl Gastroenterol; 2023 Sep; 14(9):e00608. PubMed ID: 37436181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative Efficacy of Colonoscope Distal Attachment Devices in Increasing Rates of Adenoma Detection: A Network Meta-analysis.
    Facciorusso A; Del Prete V; Buccino RV; Della Valle N; Nacchiero MC; Monica F; Cannizzaro R; Muscatiello N
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Aug; 16(8):1209-1219.e9. PubMed ID: 29133257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increased Rate of Adenoma Detection Associates With Reduced Risk of Colorectal Cancer and Death.
    Kaminski MF; Wieszczy P; Rupinski M; Wojciechowska U; Didkowska J; Kraszewska E; Kobiela J; Franczyk R; Rupinska M; Kocot B; Chaber-Ciopinska A; Pachlewski J; Polkowski M; Regula J
    Gastroenterology; 2017 Jul; 153(1):98-105. PubMed ID: 28428142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Systematic review with meta-analysis: impact of one-handed vs. two-handed technique on quality outcomes of colonoscopy.
    Imperatore N; De Palma GD; Dolce P; Grassano A; Caporaso N; Rispo A
    Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2019 Sep; 23(17):7663-7673. PubMed ID: 31539159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impact of a quarterly report card on colonoscopy quality measures.
    Kahi CJ; Ballard D; Shah AS; Mears R; Johnson CS
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Jun; 77(6):925-31. PubMed ID: 23472996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Data quality and colonoscopy performance indicators in the prevalent round of a FIT-based colorectal cancer screening program.
    Lund M; Erichsen R; Valori R; Møller Jensen T; Helle Njor S; Laurberg S; Andersen B;
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr; 54(4):471-477. PubMed ID: 30978128
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Quality of colonoscopy in an organised colorectal cancer screening programme with immunochemical faecal occult blood test: the EQuIPE study (Evaluating Quality Indicators of the Performance of Endoscopy).
    Zorzi M; Senore C; Da Re F; Barca A; Bonelli LA; Cannizzaro R; Fasoli R; Di Furia L; Di Giulio E; Mantellini P; Naldoni C; Sassatelli R; Rex D; Hassan C; Zappa M;
    Gut; 2015 Sep; 64(9):1389-96. PubMed ID: 25227521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Impact of feedback on adenoma detection rate: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Boregowda U; Desai M; Nutalapati V; Paleti S; Olyaee M; Rastogi A
    Ann Gastroenterol; 2021; 34(2):214-223. PubMed ID: 33654362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopist characteristics that influence the quality of colonoscopy.
    Jover R; Zapater P; Bujanda L; Hernández V; Cubiella J; Pellisé M; Ponce M; Ono A; Lanas A; Seoane A; Marín-Gabriel JC; Chaparro M; Cacho G; Herreros-de-Tejada A; Fernández-Díez S; Peris A; Nicolás-Pérez D; Murcia O; Castells A; Quintero E;
    Endoscopy; 2016 Mar; 48(3):241-7. PubMed ID: 26845473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physician report cards and implementing standards of practice are both significantly associated with improved screening colonoscopy quality.
    Keswani RN; Yadlapati R; Gleason KM; Ciolino JD; Manka M; O'Leary KJ; Barnard C; Pandolfino JE
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2015 Aug; 110(8):1134-9. PubMed ID: 25869388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Negative Effects of Endoscopists' Fatigue on Colonoscopy Quality on 34,022 Screening Colonoscopies.
    Dong Z; Wang J; Chen Y; Sun H; Li B; Zhang Q; Sun K; Wang Z; Qian X; Zhan T; Jiang Y; Xu S
    J Gastrointestin Liver Dis; 2021 Sep; 30(3):358-365. PubMed ID: 34551036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of cecal intubation and adenoma detection between hospitals can provide incentives to improve quality of colonoscopy.
    Belderbos TD; Grobbee EJ; van Oijen MG; Meijssen MA; Ouwendijk RJ; Tang TJ; ter Borg F; van der Schaar P; Le Fèvre DM; Stouten MT; van der Galiën O; Hiemstra TJ; de Vos tot Nederveen Cappel WH; ter Borg PC; Spaander MC; Moons LM; Kuipers EJ; Siersema PD
    Endoscopy; 2015 Aug; 47(8):703-9. PubMed ID: 26090725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Sedation in screening colonoscopy: impact on quality indicators and complications.
    Bannert C; Reinhart K; Dunkler D; Trauner M; Renner F; Knoflach P; Ferlitsch A; Weiss W; Ferlitsch M
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2012 Dec; 107(12):1837-48. PubMed ID: 23147522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.