These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33015580)

  • 1. Clinically relevant finite element technique based protocol to evaluate growing rods for early onset scoliosis correction.
    Shekouhi N; Dick D; Baechle MW; Kaeley DK; Goel VK; Serhan H; Rawlinson J; Shaw D
    JOR Spine; 2020 Sep; 3(3):e1119. PubMed ID: 33015580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Current benchtop protocols are not appropriate for the evaluation of distraction-based growing rods: a literature review to justify a new protocol and its development.
    Shekouhi N; Kelkar A; Dick D; Goel VK; Shaw D
    Eur Spine J; 2022 Apr; 31(4):963-979. PubMed ID: 35092449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Mechanical performance of traditional distraction-based dual growing rod constructs.
    Hill G; Nagaraja S; Bridges A; Vosoughi AS; Goel VK; Dreher ML
    Spine J; 2019 Apr; 19(4):744-754. PubMed ID: 30219359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Mechanical Performance of Posterior Spinal Instrumentation and Growing Rod Implants: Experimental and Computational Study.
    Foltz MH; Freeman AL; Loughran G; Bechtold JE; Barocas VH; Ellingson AM; Polly DW
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2019 Sep; 44(18):1270-1278. PubMed ID: 30994599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Towards a validated patient-specific computational modeling framework to identify failure regions in traditional growing rods in patients with early onset scoliosis.
    Agarwal A; Kodigudla M; Kelkar A; Jayaswal D; Goel V; Palepu V
    N Am Spine Soc J; 2021 Mar; 5():100043. PubMed ID: 35141610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some Connectors in Distraction-based Growing Rods Fail More Than Others.
    Lee C; Myung KS; Skaggs DL
    Spine Deform; 2013 Mar; 1(2):148-156. PubMed ID: 27927432
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Flexible non-fusion scoliosis correction systems reduce intervertebral rotation less than rigid implants and allow growth of the spine: a finite element analysis of different features of orthobiom.
    Rohlmann A; Zander T; Burra NK; Bergmann G
    Eur Spine J; 2008 Feb; 17(2):217-23. PubMed ID: 17712575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single distraction-rod constructs in severe early-onset scoliosis: Indications and outcomes.
    Luhmann SJ; Skaggs DL; Pahys J; Samdani A; El-Hawary R
    Spine J; 2022 Feb; 22(2):305-312. PubMed ID: 34547389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of the suitability of biodegradable rods for use in posterior lumbar fusion: An in-vitro biomechanical evaluation and finite element analysis.
    Tsuang FY; Hsieh YY; Kuo YJ; Chen CH; Lin FH; Chen CS; Chiang CJ
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(11):e0188034. PubMed ID: 29145437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Radiographic Outcome Differences in Distraction-Based Growing Rod Constructs Using Tandem Versus Wedding Band Connectors.
    Oetgen ME; Matthews A; Wang Y; Blakemore L; Pawelek J; McClung A; Sponseller P; Perez-Grueso FS; Akbarnia B;
    Spine Deform; 2018; 6(3):314-319. PubMed ID: 29735143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Distraction magnitude and frequency affects the outcome in juvenile idiopathic patients with growth rods: finite element study using a representative scoliotic spine model.
    Agarwal A; Zakeri A; Agarwal AK; Jayaswal A; Goel VK
    Spine J; 2015 Aug; 15(8):1848-55. PubMed ID: 25862502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative analysis of international standards for the fatigue testing of posterior spinal fixation systems: the importance of preload in ISO 12189.
    La Barbera L; Ottardi C; Villa T
    Spine J; 2015 Oct; 15(10):2290-6. PubMed ID: 26235467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Validation of a patient-specific finite element analysis framework for identification of growing rod-failure regions in early onset scoliosis patients.
    Jayaswal D; Kodigudla M; Kelkar A; Goel V; Palepu V
    Spine Deform; 2024 Jul; 12(4):941-952. PubMed ID: 38536653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Retrieval and clinical analysis of distraction-based dual growing rod constructs for early-onset scoliosis.
    Hill G; Nagaraja S; Akbarnia BA; Pawelek J; Sponseller P; Sturm P; Emans J; ; Bonangelino P; Cockrum J; Kane W; Dreher M
    Spine J; 2017 Oct; 17(10):1506-1518. PubMed ID: 28456673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Standard and magnetically controlled growing rods for the treatment of early onset scoliosis.
    Helenius IJ
    Ann Transl Med; 2020 Jan; 8(2):26. PubMed ID: 32055617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Optimal satellite rod constructs to mitigate rod failure following pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO): a finite element study.
    Seyed Vosoughi A; Joukar A; Kiapour A; Parajuli D; Agarwal AK; Goel VK; Zavatsky J
    Spine J; 2019 May; 19(5):931-941. PubMed ID: 30414992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spring distraction system for dynamic growth guidance of early onset scoliosis: two-year prospective follow-up of 24 patients.
    Lemans JVC; Wijdicks SPJ; Castelein RM; Kruyt MC
    Spine J; 2021 Apr; 21(4):671-681. PubMed ID: 33221513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A comparison of the post-fusion outcome of patients with early-onset scoliosis treated with traditional and magnetically controlled growing rods.
    Tahir M; Mehta D; Sandhu C; Jones M; Gardner A; Mehta JS
    Bone Joint J; 2022 Feb; 104-B(2):257-264. PubMed ID: 35094579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of pre-contoured and in situ contoured rods on the mechanical strength and durability of posterior cervical instrumentation: a finite-element analysis and scanning electron microscopy investigation.
    Kim KD; Panchal R; Moldavsky M; Wang W; Bucklen BS
    Spine Deform; 2020 Aug; 8(4):569-576. PubMed ID: 32430793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do additional rods reduce loads on the primary rods in adult spinal instrumentation with pedicle subtraction osteotomy?
    Wang X; Aubin CE; Armstrong R; Rawlinson J
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2022 Mar; 93():105590. PubMed ID: 35240416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.