These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33015583)

  • 1. Improving reproducibility in spine research.
    Dahia CL; Le Maitre CL
    JOR Spine; 2020 Sep; 3(3):e1127. PubMed ID: 33015583
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of surgical experience and spine subspecialty on the reliability of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification System.
    Lambrechts MJ; Schroeder GD; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Oner FC; Benneker LM; Bransford RJ; Kandziora F; Rajasekaran S; El-Sharkawi M; Kanna R; Joaquim AF; Schnake K; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR; ;
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Jan; 38(1):31-41. PubMed ID: 35986731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An international validation of the AO spine subaxial injury classification system.
    Karamian BA; Schroeder GD; Lambrechts MJ; Canseco JA; Oner C; Vialle E; Rajasekaran S; Dvorak MR; Benneker LM; Kandziora F; Schnake K; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR;
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Jan; 32(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 36449081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reproducibility of kinematic measures of the thoracic spine, lumbar spine and pelvis during fast running.
    Mason DL; Preece SJ; Bramah CA; Herrington LC
    Gait Posture; 2016 Jan; 43():96-100. PubMed ID: 26546409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. AO Spine upper cervical injury classification system: a description and reliability study.
    Vaccaro AR; Lambrechts MJ; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Oner C; Vialle E; Rajasekaran S; Dvorak MR; Benneker LM; Kandziora F; El-Sharkawi M; Tee JW; Bransford R; Joaquim AF; Muijs SPJ; Holas M; Takahata M; Hamouda WO; Kanna RM; Schnake K; Kepler CK; Schroeder GD
    Spine J; 2022 Dec; 22(12):2042-2049. PubMed ID: 35964830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D-modeling of the spine using EOS imaging system: Inter-reader reproducibility and reliability.
    Rehm J; Germann T; Akbar M; Pepke W; Kauczor HU; Weber MA; Spira D
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171258. PubMed ID: 28152019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Measuring the posteroanterior stiffness of the cervical spine.
    Snodgrass SJ; Rivett DA; Robertson VJ
    Man Ther; 2008 Dec; 13(6):520-8. PubMed ID: 17910931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Reliability and reproducibility analysis of the AOSpine thoracolumbar spine injury classification system by Chinese spinal surgeons.
    Cheng J; Liu P; Sun D; Qin T; Ma Z; Liu J
    Eur Spine J; 2017 May; 26(5):1477-1482. PubMed ID: 27807778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An independent interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility evaluation of the new AOSpine Thoracolumbar Spine Injury Classification System.
    Urrutia J; Zamora T; Yurac R; Campos M; Palma J; Mobarec S; Prada C
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Jan; 40(1):E54-8. PubMed ID: 25341990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. European guidelines on quality criteria for diagnostic radiographic images of the lumbar spine - an intra- and inter-observer reproducibility study.
    Doktor K; Vilholm ML; Hardardóttir A; Christensen HW; Lauritsen J
    Chiropr Man Therap; 2019; 27():20. PubMed ID: 31069046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Validation of a new computer-assisted tool to measure spino-pelvic parameters.
    Lafage R; Ferrero E; Henry JK; Challier V; Diebo B; Liabaud B; Lafage V; Schwab F
    Spine J; 2015 Dec; 15(12):2493-502. PubMed ID: 26343243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Global Validation of the AO Spine Upper Cervical Injury Classification.
    Vaccaro AR; Lambrechts MJ; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Oner C; Benneker LM; Bransford R; Kandziora F; Shanmuganathan R; El-Sharkawi M; Kanna R; Joaquim A; Schnake K; Kepler CK; Schroeder GD;
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2022 Nov; 47(22):1541-1548. PubMed ID: 35877555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External Multicenter Study of Reliability and Reproducibility for Lower Cervical Spine Injuries Classification Systems-Part 2: An Analysis of the Subaxial Cervical Spine Injury Classification and Cervical Spine Injury Severity Score Scale.
    Grin A; Krylov V; Lvov I; Talypov A; Dzukaev D; Kordonskiy A; Smirnov V; Karanadze V; Abdukhalikov B; Khushnazarov U; Airapetyan A; Dmitriev A; Kaykov A; Peyker A; Semchenko V; Aksenov A; Borzenkov A; Gulyy V; Torchinov S; Bagaev S; Toporskiy A; Kalandari A; Kasatkin D; Sytnik A; Lebedev V; Epifanov D; Hovrin D; Feniksov V; Choriev D
    Global Spine J; 2021 Jan; 11(1):99-107. PubMed ID: 32875837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A reduced micro-dose protocol for 3D reconstruction of the spine in children with scoliosis: results of a phantom-based and clinically validated study using stereo-radiography.
    Pedersen PH; Vergari C; Alzakri A; Vialle R; Skalli W
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Apr; 29(4):1874-1881. PubMed ID: 30350165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development of Online Technique for International Validation of the AO Spine Subaxial Injury Classification System.
    Lambrechts MJ; Schroeder GD; Karamian BA; Canseco JA; Oner C; Vialle E; Rajasekaran S; Hazenbiller O; Dvorak MR; Benneker LM; Kandziora F; Schnake K; Kepler CK; Vaccaro AR;
    Global Spine J; 2024 Jan; 14(1):177-186. PubMed ID: 35475400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Spine segmentation using articulated shape models.
    Klinder T; Wolz R; Lorenz C; Franz A; Ostermann J
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2008; 11(Pt 1):227-34. PubMed ID: 18979752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Moderate Interrater and Substantial Intrarater Reproducibility of the Roussouly Classification System in Patients With Adult Spinal Deformity.
    Bari TJ; Hallager DW; Tøndevold N; Karbo T; Hansen LV; Dahl B; Gehrchen M
    Spine Deform; 2019 Mar; 7(2):312-318. PubMed ID: 30660227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical validation of coronal and sagittal spinal curve measurements based on three-dimensional vertebra vector parameters.
    Somoskeöy S; Tunyogi-Csapó M; Bogyó C; Illés T
    Spine J; 2012 Oct; 12(10):960-8. PubMed ID: 23018164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. SU-E-J-171: Evaluation of Cervical Spine and Mandible Reproducibility of the CDR Mayo Mold and Civco Type-S Head and Neck Immobilization Systems.
    Chungbin S
    Med Phys; 2012 Jun; 39(6Part8):3692. PubMed ID: 28518941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reproducibility of volume-adjusted bone mineral density of spine and hip from dual X-ray absorptiometry.
    Leslie WD; DeVos G; Dupont JO; Peterdy AE
    J Clin Densitom; 2001; 4(4):307-12. PubMed ID: 11748335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.