BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33015706)

  • 1. Effect of surgical start time on short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity-score matching analysis.
    Bao T; Zhao XL; Li KK; Wang YJ; Guo W
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Jun; 34(6):. PubMed ID: 33015706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Effect of pleural adhesions on short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Bao T; Zhao XL; Liu B; Li KK; Wang YJ; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2023 Mar; 37(3):1727-1734. PubMed ID: 36214915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Short- and long-term outcomes of prophylactic thoracic duct ligation during thoracoscopic-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for cancer: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Bao T; Wang YJ; Li KK; Liu XH; Guo W
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Nov; 34(11):5023-5029. PubMed ID: 31828499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short- and mid-term outcomes of robotic versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for squamous cell esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Yang Y; Zhang X; Li B; Hua R; Yang Y; He Y; Ye B; Guo X; Sun Y; Li Z
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 Jun; 33(6):. PubMed ID: 31608939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Robot-assisted versus video-assisted thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown's esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis of minimally invasive approaches.
    Kulkarni A; Mulchandani JG; Sadat MS; Shetty N; Shetty S; Kumar MP; Kudari A
    J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1289-1297. PubMed ID: 35044671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Updated experiences with minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.
    Mu JW; Gao SG; Xue Q; Mao YS; Wang DL; Zhao J; Gao YS; Huang JF; He J
    World J Gastroenterol; 2015 Dec; 21(45):12873-81. PubMed ID: 26668512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted versus thoraco-laparoscopic McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched study.
    Xu Y; Li XK; Cong ZZ; Zhou H; Wu WJ; Qiang Y; Yi J; Shen Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Sep; 34(9):. PubMed ID: 33150401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Evaluation of the perioperative period and long-term outcomes of minimally invasive LTE and minimally invasive CTLE esophagectomy for stage Ⅰ-Ⅲ cervical esophageal carcinoma based on propensity score matching analysis].
    Yu Z; Yu L; Chen XH; Yu T; Zhang BX; Yang XG; Du X; Gao X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2022 Feb; 102(5):357-362. PubMed ID: 35092977
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Does robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy really have the advantage of lymphadenectomy over video-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy in treating esophageal squamous cell carcinoma? A propensity score-matched analysis based on short-term outcomes.
    Deng HY; Luo J; Li SX; Li G; Alai G; Wang Y; Liu LX; Lin YD
    Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30496378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Modified McKeown minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a 5-year retrospective study of 142 patients in a single institution.
    Chen B; Zhang B; Zhu C; Ye Z; Wang C; Ma D; Ye M; Kong M; Jin J; Lin J; Wu C; Wang Z; Ye J; Zhang J; Hu Q
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(12):e82428. PubMed ID: 24376537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impact of body mass index on perioperative and oncological outcomes in elderly patients undergoing minimally invasive McKeown esophagectomy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
    Tong C; Lu H; Zhu H; Wu J
    Cancer Med; 2022 Aug; 11(15):2913-2922. PubMed ID: 35312237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Propensity Score-Matched Analysis Comparing Minimally Invasive Ivor Lewis Versus Minimally Invasive Mckeown Esophagectomy.
    van Workum F; Slaman AE; van Berge Henegouwen MI; Gisbertz SS; Kouwenhoven EA; van Det MJ; van den Wildenberg FJH; Polat F; Luyer MDP; Nieuwenhuijzen GAP; Rosman C
    Ann Surg; 2020 Jan; 271(1):128-133. PubMed ID: 30102633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Effect of the postural transition in minimally invasive esophagectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.
    Tanishima Y; Nishikawa K; Ishikawa Y; Takahashi K; Masuda T; Kurogochi T; Yuda M; Tanaka Y; Matsumoto A; Yano F; Mitsumori N; Ikegami T
    Surg Endosc; 2022 Jun; 36(6):3947-3956. PubMed ID: 34494153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Propensity-Matched Analysis Comparing Survival After Hybrid Thoracoscopic-Laparotomy Esophagectomy and Complete Thoracoscopic-Laparoscopic Esophagectomy.
    Li KK; Wang YJ; Liu XH; Wang RW; Jiang YG; Guo W
    World J Surg; 2019 Mar; 43(3):853-861. PubMed ID: 30386913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lower Incidence of Postoperative Pulmonary Complications Following Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Propensity Score-Matched Comparison to Conventional Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy.
    Tsunoda S; Obama K; Hisamori S; Nishigori T; Okamura R; Maekawa H; Sakai Y
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 28(2):639-647. PubMed ID: 32892268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally Invasive
    Knitter S; Andreou A; Hofmann T; Chopra S; Denecke C; Thuss-Patience PC; Kröll D; Bahra M; Schmelzle M; Pratschke J; Biebl M
    Anticancer Res; 2021 Jul; 41(7):3499-3510. PubMed ID: 34230145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A standardized comparison of peri-operative complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy: Ivor Lewis versus McKeown.
    Brown AM; Pucci MJ; Berger AC; Tatarian T; Evans NR; Rosato EL; Palazzo F
    Surg Endosc; 2018 Jan; 32(1):204-211. PubMed ID: 28643075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Safety and feasibility of minimally invasive esophagectomy for elderly esophageal cancer patients.
    Sugita Y; Nakamura T; Sawada R; Takiguchi G; Urakawa N; Hasegawa H; Yamamoto M; Kanaji S; Matsuda Y; Yamashita K; Matsuda T; Oshikiri T; Suzuki S; Kakeji Y
    Dis Esophagus; 2021 Mar; 34(3):. PubMed ID: 32895704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparative outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a propensity score-weighted analysis.
    Yun JK; Chong BK; Kim HJ; Lee IS; Gong CS; Kim BS; Lee GD; Choi S; Kim HR; Kim DK; Park SI; Kim YH
    Dis Esophagus; 2020 May; 33(5):. PubMed ID: 31665266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Short-term outcomes of robot-assisted minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: a propensity score matched analysis.
    He H; Wu Q; Wang Z; Zhang Y; Chen N; Fu J; Zhang G
    J Cardiothorac Surg; 2018 May; 13(1):52. PubMed ID: 29792203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.