These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33016159)

  • 1. Slow-pull technique yields better quality smears: prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration.
    Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Szűcs M; Füredi Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Farkas K; Molnár T; Milassin Á; Bálint A; Szántó K; Hamar S; Kaizer L; Tiszlavicz L; Szepes Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2020 Nov; 55(11):1369-1376. PubMed ID: 33016159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prospective comparison of slow-pull and standard suction techniques of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration in the diagnosis of solid pancreatic cancer.
    Bor R; Vasas B; Fábián A; Bálint A; Farkas K; Milassin Á; Czakó L; Rutka M; Molnár T; Szűcs M; Tiszlavicz L; Kaizer L; Hamar S; Szepes Z
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jan; 19(1):6. PubMed ID: 30626331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Suction versus slow-pull for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic tumors: a prospective randomized trial.
    Cheng S; Brunaldi VO; Minata MK; Chacon DA; da Silveira EB; de Moura DT; Dos Santos ME; Matuguma SE; Chaves DM; França RF; Jacomo AL; Artifon E
    HPB (Oxford); 2020 May; 22(5):779-786. PubMed ID: 31677985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stylet slow-pull vs. standard suction technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle biopsy in pancreatic solid lesions using 20 Gauge Procore™ needle: A multicenter randomized trial.
    Di Mitri R; Mocciaro F; Antonini F; Scimeca D; Conte E; Bonaccorso A; Scibetta N; Unti E; Fornelli A; Giorgini S; Binda C; Macarri G; Larghi A; Fabbri C
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Feb; 52(2):178-184. PubMed ID: 31601535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Slow-pull and different conventional suction techniques in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid lesions using 22-gauge needles.
    Chen JY; Ding QY; Lv Y; Guo W; Zhi FC; Liu SD; Cheng TM
    World J Gastroenterol; 2016 Oct; 22(39):8790-8797. PubMed ID: 27818594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Slow-Pull Using a Fanning Technique Is More Useful Than the Standard Suction Technique in EUS-Guided Fine Needle Aspiration in Pancreatic Masses.
    Lee JM; Lee HS; Hyun JJ; Lee JM; Yoo IK; Kim SH; Choi HS; Kim ES; Keum B; Seo YS; Jeen YT; Chun HJ; Um SH; Kim CD
    Gut Liver; 2018 May; 12(3):360-366. PubMed ID: 29409303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Slow pull versus suction in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of pancreatic solid masses.
    Nakai Y; Isayama H; Chang KJ; Yamamoto N; Hamada T; Uchino R; Mizuno S; Miyabayashi K; Yamamoto K; Kawakubo K; Kogure H; Sasaki T; Hirano K; Tanaka M; Tada M; Fukayama M; Koike K
    Dig Dis Sci; 2014 Jul; 59(7):1578-85. PubMed ID: 24429514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Stylet slow-pull versus standard suction for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid pancreatic lesions: a multicenter randomized trial.
    Saxena P; El Zein M; Stevens T; Abdelgelil A; Besharati S; Messallam A; Kumbhari V; Azola A; Brainard J; Shin EJ; Lennon AM; Canto MI; Singh VK; Khashab MA
    Endoscopy; 2018 May; 50(5):497-504. PubMed ID: 29272906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Diagnostic ability of EUS-FNA for pancreatic solid lesions with conventional 22-gauge needle using the slow pull technique: a prospective study.
    Kin T; Katanuma A; Yane K; Takahashi K; Osanai M; Takaki R; Matsumoto K; Gon K; Matsumori T; Tomonari A; Maguchi H; Shinohara T; Nojima M
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2015 Jul; 50(7):900-7. PubMed ID: 25732902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The slow-pull capillary technique increases the quality of endoscopic ultrasound fine needle biopsy samples in solid pancreatic lesions.
    El Haddad R; Barret M; Beuvon F; Grabar S; Leblanc S; Terris B; Coriat R; Chaussade S; Prat F
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2016 Aug; 28(8):911-6. PubMed ID: 27140228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stylet Slow-pull Versus Standard Suction for Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Fine-needle Aspiration/Biopsy of Pancreatic Solid Masses: A Meta-Analysis.
    Wang J; Xu H; Xu C; Feng Y; Zhang X; Zhao S
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2021 Feb; 55(2):103-109. PubMed ID: 33136779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Meta-analysis of Slow Pull versus Suction for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition.
    Nakai Y; Hamada T; Hakuta R; Sato T; Ishigaki K; Saito K; Saito T; Takahara N; Mizuno S; Kogure H; Koike K
    Gut Liver; 2021 Jul; 15(4):625-633. PubMed ID: 33592584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic efficacy of three suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy of solid pancreatic lesions: protocol for a multicenter randomized cross-over clinical trial.
    Li SY; Zhou W; Shi L; Ding Z; Yao J; Jiang YP; Gao L; Jiang H; Jin ZD; Wang KX
    Dig Liver Dis; 2020 Jul; 52(7):734-739. PubMed ID: 32430272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracies of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with distinct negative pressure suction techniques in solid lesions: A retrospective study.
    Wang R; Wang J; Li Y; Duan Y; Wu X; Cheng B
    Oncol Lett; 2017 May; 13(5):3709-3716. PubMed ID: 28521473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Touch imprint cytology on endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle biopsy provides comparable sample quality and diagnostic yield to standard endoscopic ultrasound fine-needle aspiration specimens in the evaluation of solid pancreatic lesions.
    Crinò SF; Larghi A; Bernardoni L; Parisi A; Frulloni L; Gabbrielli A; Parcesepe P; Scarpa A; Manfrin E
    Cytopathology; 2019 Mar; 30(2):179-186. PubMed ID: 30484917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of solid pancreatic masses: 22-gauge aspiration versus 25-gauge biopsy needles.
    Yang MJ; Yim H; Hwang JC; Lee D; Kim YB; Lim SG; Kim SS; Kang JK; Yoo BM; Kim JH
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2015 Sep; 15():122. PubMed ID: 26419845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Endoscopic Ultrasound-guided Specimen Collection and Evaluation Techniques Affect Diagnostic Accuracy.
    Bang JY; Navaneethan U; Hasan MK; Hawes R; Varadarajulu S
    Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2018 Nov; 16(11):1820-1828.e4. PubMed ID: 29535060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Wet- versus dry-suction techniques for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of solid lesions: a multicenter randomized controlled trial.
    Wang Y; Wang RH; Ding Z; Tan SY; Chen Q; Duan YQ; Zhu LR; Cao JW; Wang J; Shi G; Wu XL; Wang JL; Zhao YC; Tang SJ; Cheng B
    Endoscopy; 2020 Nov; 52(11):995-1003. PubMed ID: 32413915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A prospective, comparative trial to optimize sampling techniques in EUS-guided FNA of solid pancreatic masses.
    Lee JK; Choi JH; Lee KH; Kim KM; Shin JU; Lee JK; Lee KT; Jang KT
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 May; 77(5):745-51. PubMed ID: 23433878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Wet-suction versus slow-pull technique for endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle biopsy: a multicenter, randomized, crossover trial.
    Crinò SF; Conti Bellocchi MC; Di Mitri R; Inzani F; Rimbaș M; Lisotti A; Manfredi G; Teoh AYB; Mangiavillano B; Sendino O; Bernardoni L; Manfrin E; Scimeca D; Unti E; Carlino A; Voiosu T; Mateescu RB; Fusaroli P; Lega S; Buscarini E; Pergola L; Chan SM; Lamonaca L; Ginès À; Fernández-Esparrach G; Facciorusso A; Larghi A
    Endoscopy; 2023 Mar; 55(3):225-234. PubMed ID: 35915956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.