345 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33016230)
1. Automated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning for Cervical Cancer Based on Convolution Neural Network.
Jihong C; Penggang B; Xiuchun Z; Kaiqiang C; Wenjuan C; Yitao D; Jiewei Q; Kerun Q; Jing Z; Tianming W
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2020; 19():1533033820957002. PubMed ID: 33016230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Automatic dose prediction using deep learning and plan optimization with finite-element control for intensity modulated radiation therapy.
Shen Y; Tang X; Lin S; Jin X; Ding J; Shao M
Med Phys; 2024 Jan; 51(1):545-555. PubMed ID: 37748133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accelerate treatment planning process using deep learning generated fluence maps for cervical cancer radiation therapy.
Yuan Z; Wang Y; Hu P; Zhang D; Yan B; Lu HM; Zhang H; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2022 Apr; 49(4):2631-2641. PubMed ID: 35157337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Attention-aware 3D U-Net convolutional neural network for knowledge-based planning 3D dose distribution prediction of head-and-neck cancer.
Osman AFI; Tamam NM
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2022 Jul; 23(7):e13630. PubMed ID: 35533234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A hybrid optimization strategy for deliverable intensity-modulated radiotherapy plan generation using deep learning-based dose prediction.
Sun Z; Xia X; Fan J; Zhao J; Zhang K; Wang J; Hu W
Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1344-1356. PubMed ID: 35043971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Optimal dose limitation strategy for bone marrow sparing in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of cervical cancer.
Bao Z; Wang D; Chen S; Chen M; Jiang D; Yang C; Liu H; Dai J; Xie C
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):118. PubMed ID: 31378200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Tree-based exploration of the optimization objectives for automatic cervical cancer IMRT treatment planning.
Wang H; Wang R; Liu J; Zhang J; Yao K; Yue H; Zhang Y; You J; Wu H
Br J Radiol; 2021 Jul; 94(1123):20210214. PubMed ID: 34111955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Highly Efficient Training, Refinement, and Validation of a Knowledge-based Planning Quality-Control System for Radiation Therapy Clinical Trials.
Li N; Carmona R; Sirak I; Kasaova L; Followill D; Michalski J; Bosch W; Straube W; Mell LK; Moore KL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2017 Jan; 97(1):164-172. PubMed ID: 27979445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Dosimetric comparison of different multileaf collimator leaves in treatment planning of intensity-modulated radiotherapy for cervical cancer.
Wang S; Ai P; Xie L; Xu Q; Bai S; Lu Y; Li P; Chen N
Med Dosim; 2013; 38(4):454-9. PubMed ID: 24099965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A knowledge-based intensity-modulated radiation therapy treatment planning technique for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma radiotherapy.
Bai P; Weng X; Quan K; Chen J; Dai Y; Xu Y; Lin F; Zhong J; Wu T; Chen C
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Aug; 15(1):188. PubMed ID: 32746873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of dose calculation accuracy during optimization on lung IMRT plan quality.
Li Y; Rodrigues A; Li T; Yuan L; Yin FF; Wu QJ
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Jan; 16(1):5137. PubMed ID: 25679172
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using deep learning to predict beam-tunable Pareto optimal dose distribution for intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
Bohara G; Sadeghnejad Barkousaraie A; Jiang S; Nguyen D
Med Phys; 2020 Sep; 47(9):3898-3912. PubMed ID: 32621789
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Automatic IMRT planning via static field fluence prediction (AIP-SFFP): a deep learning algorithm for real-time prostate treatment planning.
Li X; Zhang J; Sheng Y; Chang Y; Yin FF; Ge Y; Wu QJ; Wang C
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Sep; 65(17):175014. PubMed ID: 32663813
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of plan quality and robustness of IMPT and helical IMRT for cervical cancer.
Shang H; Pu Y; Wang W; Dai Z; Jin F
Radiat Oncol; 2020 Feb; 15(1):34. PubMed ID: 32054496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Automatic treatment planning based on three-dimensional dose distribution predicted from deep learning technique.
Fan J; Wang J; Chen Z; Hu C; Zhang Z; Hu W
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):370-381. PubMed ID: 30383300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Volumetric-modulated arc therapy vs. c-IMRT in esophageal cancer: a treatment planning comparison.
Yin L; Wu H; Gong J; Geng JH; Jiang F; Shi AH; Yu R; Li YH; Han SK; Xu B; Zhu GY
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Oct; 18(37):5266-75. PubMed ID: 23066322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A treatment planning study comparing volumetric arc modulation with RapidArc and fixed field IMRT for cervix uteri radiotherapy.
Cozzi L; Dinshaw KA; Shrivastava SK; Mahantshetty U; Engineer R; Deshpande DD; Jamema SV; Vanetti E; Clivio A; Nicolini G; Fogliata A
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Nov; 89(2):180-91. PubMed ID: 18692929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy and volumetric-modulated arc therapy in the treatment of postoperative cervical cancer patients.
Deng X; Han C; Chen S; Xie C; Yi J; Zhou Y; Zheng X; Deng Z; Jin X
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):25-31. PubMed ID: 28291936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Dosimetric evaluation of automatic and manual plans for early nasopharyngeal carcinoma to radiotherapy.
Zhang Q; Peng Y; Song X; Yu H; Wang L; Zhang S
Med Dosim; 2020 Spring; 45(1):e13-e20. PubMed ID: 31466735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Clinical validation and benchmarking of knowledge-based IMRT and VMAT treatment planning in pelvic anatomy.
Hussein M; South CP; Barry MA; Adams EJ; Jordan TJ; Stewart AJ; Nisbet A
Radiother Oncol; 2016 Sep; 120(3):473-479. PubMed ID: 27427380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
