126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33016317)
1. Esophageal defect repair by artificial scaffolds: a systematic review of experimental studies and proportional meta-analysis.
Schizas D; Frountzas M; Sgouromallis E; Spartalis E; Mylonas KS; Papaioannou TG; Dimitroulis D; Nikiteas N
Dis Esophagus; 2021 Mar; 34(3):. PubMed ID: 33016317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Technical factors that affect anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Markar SR; Arya S; Karthikesalingam A; Hanna GB
Ann Surg Oncol; 2013 Dec; 20(13):4274-81. PubMed ID: 23943033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Long-term functional outcomes after replacement of the esophagus with gastric, colonic, or jejunal conduits: a systematic literature review.
Irino T; Tsekrekos A; Coppola A; Scandavini CM; Shetye A; Lundell L; Rouvelas I
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Dec; 30(12):1-11. PubMed ID: 28881882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sarcopenia does not affect postoperative complication rates in oesophageal cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Schizas D; Frountzas M; Lidoriki I; Spartalis E; Toutouzas K; Dimitroulis D; Liakakos T; Mylonas KS
Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 2020 Feb; 102(2):120-132. PubMed ID: 31508983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gastric-tube versus whole-stomach esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Zhang W; Yu D; Peng J; Xu J; Wei Y
PLoS One; 2017; 12(3):e0173416. PubMed ID: 28267808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Cervical anastomotic stenosis after gastric tube reconstruction in esophageal carcinoma. Evaluation of a patient sample 1989-1995].
Bruns CJ; Gawenda M; Wolfgarten B; Walter M
Langenbecks Arch Chir; 1997; 382(3):145-8. PubMed ID: 9324613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Stenosis of the celiac trunk is associated with anastomotic leak after Ivor-Lewis esophagectomy.
Brinkmann S; Chang DH; Kuhr K; Hoelscher AH; Spiro J; Bruns CJ; Schroeder W
Dis Esophagus; 2019 Jul; 32(7):. PubMed ID: 30820543
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental reconstruction of cervical esophageal defect with artificial esophagus made of polyurethane in a dog model.
Jiang H; Cui Y; Ma K; Gong M; Chang D; Wang T
Dis Esophagus; 2016 Jan; 29(1):62-9. PubMed ID: 25074403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Patch esophagoplasty using an in-body-tissue-engineered collagenous connective tissue membrane.
Okuyama H; Umeda S; Takama Y; Terasawa T; Nakayama Y
J Pediatr Surg; 2018 Feb; 53(2):223-226. PubMed ID: 29223663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Naso-esophageal extraluminal drainage for postoperative anastomotic leak after thoracic esophagectomy for patients with esophageal cancer.
Shuto K; Kono T; Akutsu Y; Uesato M; Mori M; Matsuo K; Kosugi C; Hirano A; Tanaka K; Okazumi S; Koda K; Matsubara H
Dis Esophagus; 2017 Feb; 30(3):1-9. PubMed ID: 27862613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Esophageal tissue engineering: a new approach for esophageal replacement.
Totonelli G; Maghsoudlou P; Fishman JM; Orlando G; Ansari T; Sibbons P; Birchall MA; Pierro A; Eaton S; De Coppi P
World J Gastroenterol; 2012 Dec; 18(47):6900-7. PubMed ID: 23322987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of the Associations between Gastric Tube Preparation Methods and the Incidence of Cervical Anastomotic Leakage after Esophagectomy for Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.
Miyawaki Y; Sato H; Fujiwara N; Sugita H; Sakuramoto S; Okamoto K; Yamaguchi S; Koyama I
Dig Surg; 2020; 37(2):154-162. PubMed ID: 30939466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Meta-Analysis of Two Different Methods for Cervical Esophagogastric Anastomosis: Triangulating Versus Circular Stapling.
Hua XY; Dong SY; Zhang SG
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2020 Nov; 30(11):1143-1149. PubMed ID: 32315563
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Omentoplasty for esophagogastrostomy after esophagectomy.
Yuan Y; Zeng X; Hu Y; Xie T; Zhao Y
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11():CD008446. PubMed ID: 23152259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programs for esophagectomy protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liu F; Wang W; Wang C; Peng X
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Feb; 97(8):e0016. PubMed ID: 29465538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Modified Double-Layer Anastomosis for Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy: An Effective Way to Prevent Leakage and Stricture.
Yuan Y; Zeng XX; Zhao YF; Chen LQ
World J Surg; 2017 Dec; 41(12):3164-3170. PubMed ID: 28721567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term functional outcomes after replacement of the esophagus in pediatric patients: A systematic literature review.
Garritano S; Irino T; Scandavini CM; Tsekrekos A; Lundell L; Rouvelas I
J Pediatr Surg; 2017 Sep; 52(9):1398-1408. PubMed ID: 28625693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Risk factors and outcomes associated with anastomotic leaks following esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Kamarajah SK; Lin A; Tharmaraja T; Bharwada Y; Bundred JR; Nepogodiev D; Evans RPT; Singh P; Griffiths EA
Dis Esophagus; 2020 Mar; 33(3):. PubMed ID: 31957798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Grafts of porcine intestinal submucosa for repair of cervical and abdominal esophageal defects in the rat.
Lopes MF; Cabrita A; Ilharco J; Pessa P; Patrício J
J Invest Surg; 2006; 19(2):105-11. PubMed ID: 16531368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Major Postoperative Complications in Esophageal Cancer After Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy Compared With Open Esophagectomy: An Updated Meta-analysis.
Pu S; Chen H; Zhou C; Yu S; Liao X; Zhu L; He J; Wang B
J Surg Res; 2021 Jan; 257():554-571. PubMed ID: 32927322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
