These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

226 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33017413)

  • 21. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric vs multiparametric MRI in clinically significant prostate cancer: Comparison between readers with different experience.
    Di Campli E; Delli Pizzi A; Seccia B; Cianci R; d'Annibale M; Colasante A; Cinalli S; Castellan P; Navarra R; Iantorno R; Gabrielli D; Buffone A; Caulo M; Basilico R
    Eur J Radiol; 2018 Apr; 101():17-23. PubMed ID: 29571792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 1 and version 2 and combination with apparent diffusion coefficient as a predictor of biopsy outcome.
    Ryznarová Z; Keller J; Záleský M; Zachoval R; Čapek V; Malikova H
    Neuro Endocrinol Lett; 2019 Mar; 40(1):41-50. PubMed ID: 31184822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A cohort of transperineal electromagnetically tracked magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion-guided biopsy: assessing the impact of inter-reader variability on cancer detection.
    Wajswol E; Winoker JS; Anastos H; Falagario U; Okhawere K; Martini A; Treacy PJ; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
    BJU Int; 2020 Apr; 125(4):531-540. PubMed ID: 31762182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparison of Likert and PI-RADS version 2 MRI scoring systems for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Zawaideh JP; Sala E; Pantelidou M; Shaida N; Koo B; Caglic I; Warren AY; Carmisciano L; Saeb-Parsy K; Gnanapragasam VJ; Kastner C; Barrett T
    Br J Radiol; 2020 Aug; 93(1112):20200298. PubMed ID: 32479105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Inter-Reader Variability Using PI-RADS v2 Versus PI-RADS v2.1: Most New Disagreement Stems from Scores 1 and 2.
    Beetz NL; Haas M; Baur A; Konietschke F; Roy A; Hamm CA; Rudolph MM; Shnayien S; Hamm B; Cash H; Asbach P; Penzkofer T
    Rofo; 2022 Aug; 194(8):852-861. PubMed ID: 35545106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Interreader agreement of PI-RADS v. 2 in assessing prostate cancer with multiparametric MRI: A study using whole-mount histology as the standard of reference.
    Girometti R; Giannarini G; Greco F; Isola M; Cereser L; Como G; Sioletic S; Pizzolitto S; Crestani A; Ficarra V; Zuiani C
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2019 Feb; 49(2):546-555. PubMed ID: 30187600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of multiparametric and biparametric MRI of the prostate: are gadolinium-based contrast agents needed for routine examinations?
    Junker D; Steinkohl F; Fritz V; Bektic J; Tokas T; Aigner F; Herrmann TRW; Rieger M; Nagele U
    World J Urol; 2019 Apr; 37(4):691-699. PubMed ID: 30078170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [The diagnostic value of version 2.1 prostate imaging reporting and data system for prostate transitional zone lesions].
    Yang S; Zhang CY; Zhang YY; Tan SX; Wei CG; Shen XH; Shen JK
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2020 Dec; 100(45):3609-3613. PubMed ID: 33333685
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Impact of mandated prospectively reported apparent diffusion coefficient values on the rates of positivity for clinically significant prostate cancer by PI-RADS score.
    Shaish H; Casals R; Ahmed F; Makkar J; Wenske S
    Acta Radiol; 2021 Jan; 62(1):139-144. PubMed ID: 32312102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of Multiparametric MRI Scoring Systems and the Impact on Cancer Detection in Patients Undergoing MR US Fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.
    Rastinehad AR; Waingankar N; Turkbey B; Yaskiv O; Sonstegard AM; Fakhoury M; Olsson CA; Siegel DN; Choyke PL; Ben-Levi E; Villani R
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(11):e0143404. PubMed ID: 26605548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Prospective comparison of a fast 1.5-T biparametric with the 3.0-T multiparametric ESUR magnetic resonance imaging protocol as a triage test for men at risk of prostate cancer.
    Van Nieuwenhove S; Saussez TP; Thiry S; Trefois P; Annet L; Michoux N; Lecouvet F; Tombal B
    BJU Int; 2019 Mar; 123(3):411-420. PubMed ID: 30240059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Multiparametric MRI of the prostate: diagnostic performance and interreader agreement of two scoring systems.
    Lin WC; Muglia VF; Silva GE; Chodraui Filho S; Reis RB; Westphalen AC
    Br J Radiol; 2016 Jun; 89(1062):20151056. PubMed ID: 27007818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. 1.5-T multiparametric MRI using PI-RADS: a region by region analysis to localize the index-tumor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing prostatectomy.
    Reisæter LA; Fütterer JJ; Halvorsen OJ; Nygård Y; Biermann M; Andersen E; Gravdal K; Haukaas S; Monssen JA; Huisman HJ; Akslen LA; Beisland C; Rørvik J
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Apr; 56(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 24819231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct comparison of PI-RADS version 2 and version 1 regarding interreader agreement and diagnostic accuracy for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Becker AS; Cornelius A; Reiner CS; Stocker D; Ulbrich EJ; Barth BK; Mortezavi A; Eberli D; Donati OF
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Sep; 94():58-63. PubMed ID: 28941761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Quantitative Analysis of Diffusion Weighted Imaging May Improve Risk Stratification of Prostatic Transition Zone Lesions.
    Engel H; Oerther B; Reisert M; Kellner E; Sigle A; Gratzke C; Bronsert P; Krauss T; Bamberg F; Benndorf M
    In Vivo; 2022; 36(5):2323-2331. PubMed ID: 36099133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. PI-RADS version 2: Preoperative role in the detection of normal-sized pelvic lymph node metastasis in prostate cancer.
    Park SY; Shin SJ; Jung DC; Cho NH; Choi YD; Rha KH; Hong SJ; Oh YT
    Eur J Radiol; 2017 Jun; 91():22-28. PubMed ID: 28629566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Impact of Clinical History on Maximum PI-RADS Version 2 Score: A Six-Reader 120-Case Sham History Retrospective Evaluation.
    Shankar PR; Kaza RK; Al-Hawary MM; Masch WR; Curci NE; Mendiratta-Lala M; Sakala MD; Johnson TD; Davenport MS
    Radiology; 2018 Jul; 288(1):158-163. PubMed ID: 29664338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparison between
    Liu Y; Dong Y; Liu J; Zhang X; Lin M; Xu B
    Prostate; 2021 Dec; 81(16):1329-1336. PubMed ID: 34516670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Retrospective comparison of direct in-bore magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-guided biopsy and fusion-guided biopsy in patients with MRI lesions which are likely or highly likely to be clinically significant prostate cancer.
    Venderink W; van der Leest M; van Luijtelaar A; van de Ven WJM; Fütterer JJ; Sedelaar JPM; Huisman HJ
    World J Urol; 2017 Dec; 35(12):1849-1855. PubMed ID: 28871396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The diagnostic accuracy of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging before biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer.
    Otti VC; Miller C; Powell RJ; Thomas RM; McGrath JS
    BJU Int; 2019 Jan; 123(1):82-90. PubMed ID: 29804315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.