111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33018261)
1. A novel bounded EIT protocol to generate inhomogeneous skull conductivity maps non-invasively.
Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Muravchik CH
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():1440-1443. PubMed ID: 33018261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Skull Modeling Effects in Conductivity Estimates Using Parametric Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Fernandez-Corazza M; Turovets S; Luu P; Price N; Muravchik CH; Tucker D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2018 Aug; 65(8):1785-1797. PubMed ID: 29989921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of head conductivity frequency response in vivo with optimized EIT-EEG.
Dabek J; Kalogianni K; Rotgans E; van der Helm FCT; Kwakkel G; van Wegen EEH; Daffertshofer A; de Munck JC
Neuroimage; 2016 Feb; 127():484-495. PubMed ID: 26589336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Simultaneous head tissue conductivity and EEG source location estimation.
Akalin Acar Z; Acar CE; Makeig S
Neuroimage; 2016 Jan; 124(Pt A):168-180. PubMed ID: 26302675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The application of electrical impedance tomography to reduce systematic errors in the EEG inverse problem--a simulation study.
Gonçalves S; de Munck JC; Heethaar RM; Lopes da Silva FH; van Dijk BW
Physiol Meas; 2000 Aug; 21(3):379-93. PubMed ID: 10984206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Impact of skull-to-brain conductivity ratio for high resolution EEG source localization.
Demoulin G; Pruvost-Robieux E; Marchi A; Ramdani C; Badier JM; Bartolomei F; Gavaret M
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2021 Aug; 7(5):. PubMed ID: 34298528
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of skull thickness and conductivity on current propagation for noninvasively injected currents.
Forssell M; Goswami C; Krishnan A; Chamanzar M; Grover P
J Neural Eng; 2021 May; 18(4):. PubMed ID: 33657542
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Neonatal EEG at scalp is focal and implies high skull conductivity in realistic neonatal head models.
Odabaee M; Tokariev A; Layeghy S; Mesbah M; Colditz PB; Ramon C; Vanhatalo S
Neuroimage; 2014 Aug; 96():73-80. PubMed ID: 24736169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of uncertainty in head tissue conductivity and complexity on EEG forward modeling in neonates.
Azizollahi H; Aarabi A; Wallois F
Hum Brain Mapp; 2016 Oct; 37(10):3604-22. PubMed ID: 27238749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A novel method for calibrating head models to account for variability in conductivity and its evaluation in a sphere model.
Schrader S; Antonakakis M; Rampp S; Engwer C; Wolters CH
Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245043. PubMed ID: 33113524
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. In Vivo Estimation of Head Tissue Conductivities Using Bound Constrained Optimization.
Ouypornkochagorn T; Ouypornkochagorn S
Ann Biomed Eng; 2019 Jul; 47(7):1575-1583. PubMed ID: 30927169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of skull modeling approaches on EEG source localization.
Montes-Restrepo V; van Mierlo P; Strobbe G; Staelens S; Vandenberghe S; Hallez H
Brain Topogr; 2014 Jan; 27(1):95-111. PubMed ID: 24002699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of skull sutures, spongiform bone distribution, and aging skull conductivities on the EEG forward and inverse problems.
McCann H; Beltrachini L
J Neural Eng; 2022 Feb; 19(1):. PubMed ID: 34915464
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Lobe based image reconstruction in Electrical Impedance Tomography.
Schullcke B; Gong B; Krueger-Ziolek S; Tawhai M; Adler A; Mueller-Lisse U; Moeller K
Med Phys; 2017 Feb; 44(2):426-436. PubMed ID: 28121374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of skull conductivity using SCALE head tissue conductivity estimation using EEG.
Acar ZA; Makeig S
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2022 Jul; 2022():4826-4829. PubMed ID: 36086241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The conductivity of the human skull: results of in vivo and in vitro measurements.
Oostendorp TF; Delbeke J; Stegeman DF
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2000 Nov; 47(11):1487-92. PubMed ID: 11077742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A simple method for EEG guided transcranial electrical stimulation without models.
Cancelli A; Cottone C; Tecchio F; Truong DQ; Dmochowski J; Bikson M
J Neural Eng; 2016 Jun; 13(3):036022. PubMed ID: 27172063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. An equivalent current source model and laplacian weighted minimum norm current estimates of brain electrical activity.
He B; Yao D; Lian J; Wu D
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2002 Apr; 49(4):277-88. PubMed ID: 11942719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Feature-space assessment of electrical impedance tomography coregistered with computed tomography in detecting multiple contrast targets.
Krishnan K; Liu J; Kohli K
Med Phys; 2014 Jun; 41(6):061903. PubMed ID: 24877814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Sensitivity Analysis Highlights the Importance of Accurate Head Models for Electrical Impedance Tomography Monitoring of Intracerebral Hemorrhagic Stroke.
Paldanius A; Dekdouk B; Toivanen J; Kolehmainen V; Hyttinen J
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2022 Apr; 69(4):1491-1501. PubMed ID: 34665718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
