95 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33018438)
1. Wavelet Transform and Texton based Analysis for Detection of Benign and Malignant Masses.
Bhowmick C; Dutta PK; Mahadevappa M
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2020 Jul; 2020():2178-2181. PubMed ID: 33018438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A machine learning approach on multiscale texture analysis for breast microcalcification diagnosis.
Fanizzi A; Basile TMA; Losurdo L; Bellotti R; Bottigli U; Dentamaro R; Didonna V; Fausto A; Massafra R; Moschetta M; Popescu O; Tamborra P; Tangaro S; La Forgia D
BMC Bioinformatics; 2020 Mar; 21(Suppl 2):91. PubMed ID: 32164532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Automated diagnosis of mammogram images of breast cancer using discrete wavelet transform and spherical wavelet transform features: a comparative study.
Ganesan K; Acharya UR; Chua CK; Min LC; Abraham TK
Technol Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Dec; 13(6):605-15. PubMed ID: 24000991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Aiding the Digital Mammogram for Detecting the Breast Cancer Using Shearlet Transform and Neural Network.
P S; R T
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 19(9):2665-2671. PubMed ID: 30256567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A Novel Algorithm for Breast Mass Classification in Digital Mammography Based on Feature Fusion.
Zhang Q; Li Y; Zhao G; Man P; Lin Y; Wang M
J Healthc Eng; 2020; 2020():8860011. PubMed ID: 33425311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Analysis of framelets for breast cancer diagnosis.
Thivya KS; Sakthivel P; Venkata Sai PM
Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):21-9. PubMed ID: 26409529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Usefulness of texture analysis for computerized classification of breast lesions on mammograms.
Pereira RR; Azevedo Marques PM; Honda MO; Kinoshita SK; Engelmann R; Muramatsu C; Doi K
J Digit Imaging; 2007 Sep; 20(3):248-55. PubMed ID: 17122993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Characterization of spatiotemporal changes for the classification of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic-resonance breast lesions.
Milenković J; Hertl K; Košir A; Zibert J; Tasič JF
Artif Intell Med; 2013 Jun; 58(2):101-14. PubMed ID: 23548472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Decision support system for breast cancer detection using mammograms.
Ganesan K; Acharya RU; Chua CK; Min LC; Mathew B; Thomas AK
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2013 Jul; 227(7):721-32. PubMed ID: 23636749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A statistical based feature extraction method for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram using multiresolution representation.
Meselhy Eltoukhy M; Faye I; Belhaouari Samir B
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Jan; 42(1):123-8. PubMed ID: 22115076
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Effective mammogram classification based on center symmetric-LBP features in wavelet domain using random forests.
Singh VP; Srivastava S; Srivastava R
Technol Health Care; 2017 Aug; 25(4):709-727. PubMed ID: 28582938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications.
Karahaliou AN; Boniatis IS; Skiadopoulos SG; Sakellaropoulos FN; Arikidis NS; Likaki EA; Panayiotakis GS; Costaridou LI
IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed; 2008 Nov; 12(6):731-8. PubMed ID: 19000952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Segmentation and detection of breast cancer in mammograms combining wavelet analysis and genetic algorithm.
Pereira DC; Ramos RP; do Nascimento MZ
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2014 Apr; 114(1):88-101. PubMed ID: 24513228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An Improved CAD System for Breast Cancer Diagnosis Based on Generalized Pseudo-Zernike Moment and Ada-DEWNN Classifier.
Singh SP; Urooj S
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):105. PubMed ID: 26892455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. False-positive reduction in computer-aided mass detection using mammographic texture analysis and classification.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Kurek J; Swiderski B; Kruk M; Zagrouba E
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2018 Jul; 160():75-83. PubMed ID: 29728249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Computer-aided detection of breast cancer on mammograms: a swarm intelligence optimized wavelet neural network approach.
Dheeba J; Albert Singh N; Tamil Selvi S
J Biomed Inform; 2014 Jun; 49():45-52. PubMed ID: 24509074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Classification of mass and normal breast tissue on digital mammograms: multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Helvie MA; Sahiner B; Petrick N; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1995 Sep; 22(9):1501-13. PubMed ID: 8531882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A fuzzy rule-based approach for characterization of mammogram masses into BI-RADS shape categories.
Vadivel A; Surendiran B
Comput Biol Med; 2013 May; 43(4):259-67. PubMed ID: 23414779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Quantitative comparison of clustered microcalcifications in for-presentation and for-processing mammograms in full-field digital mammography.
Wang J; Nishikawa RM; Yang Y
Med Phys; 2017 Jul; 44(7):3726-3738. PubMed ID: 28477395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A comparison of wavelet and curvelet for breast cancer diagnosis in digital mammogram.
Meselhy Eltoukhy M; Faye I; Belhaouari Samir B
Comput Biol Med; 2010 Apr; 40(4):384-91. PubMed ID: 20163793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
