96 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33018438)
21. Design of a high-sensitivity classifier based on a genetic algorithm: application to computer-aided diagnosis.
Sahiner B; Chan HP; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM
Phys Med Biol; 1998 Oct; 43(10):2853-71. PubMed ID: 9814523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Breast mass detection and diagnosis using fused features with density.
Wang Z; Huang Y; Li M; Zhang H; Li C; Xin J; Qian W
J Xray Sci Technol; 2019; 27(2):321-342. PubMed ID: 30856154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Neighborhood Structural Similarity Mapping for the Classification of Masses in Mammograms.
Rabidas R; Midya A; Chakraborty J
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform; 2018 May; 22(3):826-834. PubMed ID: 28622679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Breast cancer diagnosis in digitized mammograms using curvelet moments.
Dhahbi S; Barhoumi W; Zagrouba E
Comput Biol Med; 2015 Sep; 64():79-90. PubMed ID: 26151831
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. A wavelet-based mammographic image denoising and enhancement with homomorphic filtering.
Gorgel P; Sertbas A; Ucan ON
J Med Syst; 2010 Dec; 34(6):993-1002. PubMed ID: 20703608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Mass Detection in Mammographic Images Using Wavelet Processing and Adaptive Threshold Technique.
Vikhe PS; Thool VR
J Med Syst; 2016 Apr; 40(4):82. PubMed ID: 26811073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Correspondence in texture features between two mammographic views.
Gupta S; Markey MK
Med Phys; 2005 Jun; 32(6):1598-606. PubMed ID: 16013719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. False-positive reduction technique for detection of masses on digital mammograms: global and local multiresolution texture analysis.
Wei D; Chan HP; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Helvie MA; Adler DD; Goodsitt MM
Med Phys; 1997 Jun; 24(6):903-14. PubMed ID: 9198026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Mammographical mass detection and classification using local seed region growing-spherical wavelet transform (LSRG-SWT) hybrid scheme.
Görgel P; Sertbas A; Ucan ON
Comput Biol Med; 2013 Jul; 43(6):765-74. PubMed ID: 23668353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Location of mammograms ROI's and reduction of false-positive.
Salazar-Licea LA; Pedraza-Ortega JC; Pastrana-Palma A; Aceves-Fernandez MA
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2017 May; 143():97-111. PubMed ID: 28391823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A Method for Microcalcifications Detection in Breast Mammograms.
Alasadi AH; Al-Saedi AK
J Med Syst; 2017 Apr; 41(4):68. PubMed ID: 28284000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Segmentation of Breast Lesions in Ultrasound Images through Multiresolution Analysis Using Undecimated Discrete Wavelet Transform.
Prabusankarlal KM; Thirumoorthy P; Manavalan R
Ultrason Imaging; 2016 Nov; 38(6):384-402. PubMed ID: 26586725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Digital mammography: computer-assisted diagnosis method for mass detection with multiorientation and multiresolution wavelet transforms.
Li L; Qian W; Clarke LP
Acad Radiol; 1997 Nov; 4(11):724-31. PubMed ID: 9365751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A ranklet-based image representation for mass classification in digital mammograms.
Masotti M
Med Phys; 2006 Oct; 33(10):3951-61. PubMed ID: 17089857
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of breast masses using digitized images versus screen-film mammography.
Liang Z; Du X; Liu J; Yao X; Yang Y; Li K
Acta Radiol; 2008 Jul; 49(6):618-22. PubMed ID: 18568552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Mass detection in digital breast tomosynthesis: Deep convolutional neural network with transfer learning from mammography.
Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski L; Helvie MA; Wei J; Cha K
Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6654. PubMed ID: 27908154
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Computer-aided diagnosis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography: A feasibility study.
Patel BK; Ranjbar S; Wu T; Pockaj BA; Li J; Zhang N; Lobbes M; Zhang B; Mitchell JR
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():207-213. PubMed ID: 29279165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Classification of Breast Masses Using a Computer-Aided Diagnosis Scheme of Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammograms.
Danala G; Patel B; Aghaei F; Heidari M; Li J; Wu T; Zheng B
Ann Biomed Eng; 2018 Sep; 46(9):1419-1431. PubMed ID: 29748869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Mammographic mass detection using wavelets as input to neural networks.
Kilic N; Gorgel P; Ucan ON; Sertbas A
J Med Syst; 2010 Dec; 34(6):1083-8. PubMed ID: 20703600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Evaluation of a computer-aided detection (CAD)-enhanced 2D synthetic mammogram: comparison with standard synthetic 2D mammograms and conventional 2D digital mammography.
James JJ; Giannotti E; Chen Y
Clin Radiol; 2018 Oct; 73(10):886-892. PubMed ID: 29970247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
