These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3301883)

  • 61. [Breast cancer screening by mammography: evaluation by Gotzsche and Olsen meta-analysis].
    Agence Nationale d'Accrédiation et d'Evaluation en Santé
    J Radiol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):336-41. PubMed ID: 12741380
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Research on public health interventions in poor countries.
    Srinivasan S
    Issues Med Ethics; 2001; 9(4):118-9. PubMed ID: 16334915
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Should women 40 to 49 years of age be offered mammographic screening?
    Trop I; Deck W
    Can Fam Physician; 2006 Sep; 52(9):1050-2. PubMed ID: 17279208
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. NBSS: changes were made, suspicious changes were not.
    Baines CJ
    CMAJ; 1997 Aug; 157(3):248, 250. PubMed ID: 9269191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Breast cancer screening in Minnesota. The role of physicians.
    Korn JE; Bar-Cohen A
    Minn Med; 1996 Oct; 79(10):26-9. PubMed ID: 8937051
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. [Cancer of the breast: mass screening by mammography is not justified].
    Colin C
    Rev Med Liege; 1998 Apr; 53(4):212-3. PubMed ID: 9641016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Screening mammography in young women: a different perspective.
    Margolese R
    Lancet; 1996 Mar; 347(9005):881-2. PubMed ID: 8622398
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Guidelines for screening mammography: the controversy.
    DeBuono BA; Fulton JP
    R I Med; 1994 Oct; 77(10):360-1. PubMed ID: 7803869
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: opportunity for a rethink.
    Basinski AS
    CMAJ; 1992 Nov; 147(10):1431-4. PubMed ID: 1307231
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Screening for breast cancer. Incidence of interval cancer and detection rate of first screenings are inconsistent.
    Boer R; De Koning HJ; van Oortmarssen GJ; van der Maas PJ
    BMJ; 1995 Apr; 310(6985):1002. PubMed ID: 7727990
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Screening for breast cancer in India--is it an appropriate strategy?
    Moss S
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1270-1. PubMed ID: 18780862
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. Mammography screening for breast cancer: a view from 2 worlds.
    Murphy AM
    JAMA; 2010 Jan; 303(2):166-7. PubMed ID: 20068212
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. Controversy in clinical cancer screening--mammography.
    McKay DA
    West J Med; 1994 Jul; 161(1):58. PubMed ID: 7941509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. Diabetes and cancer screening: a win-win situation or a zero game?
    Kim C; Tabaei BP; Herman WH
    Arch Intern Med; 2006 May; 166(9):1042; author reply 1042-3. PubMed ID: 16682582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Decision making and the principles of screening for breast cancer.
    Pauker SG
    J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():142-7. PubMed ID: 1430877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Physical examination of the breasts in screening for breast cancer.
    Baines CJ
    J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():63-7. PubMed ID: 1430885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Evaluating randomized trials of screening.
    Welch HG; Black WC
    J Gen Intern Med; 1997 Feb; 12(2):118-24. PubMed ID: 9051562
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. Quantitative estimates of the impact of sensitivity and specificity in mammographic screening in Germany.
    Warmerdam PG; de Koning HJ; Boer R; Beemsterboer PM; Dierks ML; Swart E; Robra BP
    J Epidemiol Community Health; 1997 Apr; 51(2):180-6. PubMed ID: 9196649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Sampling strategies in nested case-control studies.
    Langholz B; Clayton D
    Environ Health Perspect; 1994 Nov; 102 Suppl 8(Suppl 8):47-51. PubMed ID: 7851330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.