These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33019020)
41. Converting between estimates of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity derived from raw accelerations measured at the wrist and from ActiGraph counts measured at the hip: the Rosetta Stone. Brazendale K; Beets MW; Rowlands AV; Chandler JL; Fairclough SJ; Boddy LM; Olds TS; Parfitt G; Noonan RJ; Downs SJ; Cliff DP J Sports Sci; 2018 Nov; 36(22):2603-2607. PubMed ID: 29708474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry. Gomersall SR; Ng N; Burton NW; Pavey TG; Gilson ND; Brown WJ J Med Internet Res; 2016 Sep; 18(9):e239. PubMed ID: 27604226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of Sedentary Estimates between activPAL and Hip- and Wrist-Worn ActiGraph. Koster A; Shiroma EJ; Caserotti P; Matthews CE; Chen KY; Glynn NW; Harris TB Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2016 Aug; 48(8):1514-1522. PubMed ID: 27031744 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Assessment of the MyWellness Key accelerometer in people with type 2 diabetes. McGinley SK; Armstrong MJ; Khandwala F; Zanuso S; Sigal RJ Appl Physiol Nutr Metab; 2015 Nov; 40(11):1193-8. PubMed ID: 26489052 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Comparison Between Wrist-Worn and Waist-Worn Accelerometry. Loprinzi PD; Smith B J Phys Act Health; 2017 Jul; 14(7):539-545. PubMed ID: 28290761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Mobile Device Accuracy for Step Counting Across Age Groups. Modave F; Guo Y; Bian J; Gurka MJ; Parish A; Smith MD; Lee AM; Buford TW JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2017 Jun; 5(6):e88. PubMed ID: 28659255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Development of cut-points for determining activity intensity from a wrist-worn ActiGraph accelerometer in free-living adults. Montoye AHK; Clevenger KA; Pfeiffer KA; Nelson MB; Bock JM; Imboden MT; Kaminsky LA J Sports Sci; 2020 Nov; 38(22):2569-2578. PubMed ID: 32677510 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. These Shoes Are Made for Walking: Sensitivity Performance Evaluation of Commercial Activity Monitors under the Expected Conditions and Circumstances Required to Achieve the International Daily Step Goal of 10,000 Steps. O'Connell S; Ă“Laighin G; Kelly L; Murphy E; Beirne S; Burke N; Kilgannon O; Quinlan LR PLoS One; 2016; 11(5):e0154956. PubMed ID: 27167121 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Evaluation of ActiGraph's low-frequency filter in laboratory and free-living environments. Feito Y; Garner HR; Bassett DR Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2015 Jan; 47(1):211-7. PubMed ID: 24870583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Application and Validation of Activity Monitors' Epoch Lengths and Placement Sites for Physical Activity Assessment in Exergaming. Hwang J; Fernandez AM; Lu AS J Clin Med; 2018 Sep; 7(9):. PubMed ID: 30208567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Physical Activity Assessment Between Consumer- and Research-Grade Accelerometers: A Comparative Study in Free-Living Conditions. Dominick GM; Winfree KN; Pohlig RT; Papas MA JMIR Mhealth Uhealth; 2016 Sep; 4(3):e110. PubMed ID: 27644334 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Comparison of physical activity assessed using hip- and wrist-worn accelerometers. Kamada M; Shiroma EJ; Harris TB; Lee IM Gait Posture; 2016 Feb; 44():23-8. PubMed ID: 27004628 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Effects of a brief, pedometer-based behavioral intervention for individuals with COPD during inpatient pulmonary rehabilitation on 6-week and 6-month objectively measured physical activity: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Geidl W; Semrau J; Streber R; Lehbert N; Wingart S; Tallner A; Wittmann M; Wagner R; Schultz K; Pfeifer K Trials; 2017 Aug; 18(1):396. PubMed ID: 28851462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps? An HS; Jones GC; Kang SK; Welk GJ; Lee JM Eur J Sport Sci; 2017 Apr; 17(3):360-368. PubMed ID: 27912681 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Comparison between Mother, ActiGraph wGT3X-BT, and a hand tally for measuring steps at various walking speeds under controlled conditions. Riel H; Rathleff CR; Kalstrup PM; Madsen NK; Pedersen ES; Pape-Haugaard LB; Villumsen M PeerJ; 2016; 4():e2799. PubMed ID: 28028469 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of the Omron HJ-720ITC pedometer under free-living conditions. Silcott NA; Bassett DR; Thompson DL; Fitzhugh EC; Steeves JA Med Sci Sports Exerc; 2011 Sep; 43(9):1791-7. PubMed ID: 21311356 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Imboden MT; Nelson MB; Kaminsky LA; Montoye AH Br J Sports Med; 2018 Jul; 52(13):844-850. PubMed ID: 28483930 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Daily Physical Activity Among Toddlers: Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Assessments. Kwon S; Honegger K; Mason M Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2019 Nov; 16(21):. PubMed ID: 31683776 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Validation of a physical activity accelerometer device worn on the hip and wrist against polysomnography. Full KM; Kerr J; Grandner MA; Malhotra A; Moran K; Godoble S; Natarajan L; Soler X Sleep Health; 2018 Apr; 4(2):209-216. PubMed ID: 29555136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Validity and reliability of Fitbit activity monitors compared to ActiGraph GT3X+ with female adults in a free-living environment. Reid RER; Insogna JA; Carver TE; Comptour AM; Bewski NA; Sciortino C; Andersen RE J Sci Med Sport; 2017 Jun; 20(6):578-582. PubMed ID: 27887786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]