These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

81 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3301933)

  • 21. Microleakage of light-cured resin and resin-modified glass-ionomer dentin bonding agents applied with co-cure vs pre-cure technique.
    Tulunoglu O; Uçtaşh M; Alaçam A; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2000; 25(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 11203833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of flowable resin composite on microleakage in class V cavities.
    Yazici AR; Baseren M; Dayangaç B
    Oper Dent; 2003; 28(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 12540117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The effect of current-generation bonding systems on microleakage of resin composite restorations.
    Yazici AR; Başeren M; Dayangaç B
    Quintessence Int; 2002; 33(10):763-9. PubMed ID: 12553620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The effect of additional enamel etching and a flowable composite to the interfacial integrity of Class II adhesive composite restorations.
    Belli S; Inokoshi S; Ozer F; Pereira PN; Ogata M; Tagami J
    Oper Dent; 2001; 26(1):70-5. PubMed ID: 11203780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Effect of placement techniques on the marginal adaptation of Class V composite restorations.
    Sensi LG; Marson FC; Baratieri LN; Monteiro Junior S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2005 Nov; 6(4):17-25. PubMed ID: 16299603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The effect of occlusal loading on the microleakage of class V restorations.
    Arisu HD; Uçtasli MB; Eligüzeloglu E; Ozcan S; Omürlü H
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(2):135-41. PubMed ID: 18435186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of gingival fluid on marginal adaptation of Class II resin-based composite restorations.
    Spahr A; Schön F; Haller B
    Am J Dent; 2000 Oct; 13(5):261-6. PubMed ID: 11764113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Inhibition of marginal leakage with a dentin bonding agent.
    Dumsha T; Biron G
    J Dent Res; 1984 Oct; 63(10):1255-7. PubMed ID: 6384301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of accelerated restorative techniques on the microleakage of Class II composites.
    Uctasli S; Shortall AC; Burke FJ
    Am J Dent; 2002 Jun; 15(3):153-8. PubMed ID: 12469751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effect of flowable composite liner and glass ionomer liner on class II gingival marginal adaptation of direct composite restorations with different bonding strategies.
    Aggarwal V; Singla M; Yadav S; Yadav H
    J Dent; 2014 May; 42(5):619-25. PubMed ID: 24631232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of solvent type in experimental dentin primer on the marginal adaptation of Class V restorations.
    Balkenhol M; Huang J; Wöstmann B; Hannig M
    J Dent; 2007 Nov; 35(11):836-44. PubMed ID: 17905507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of wet and dry bonding techniques on marginal leakage.
    Santini A; Mitchell S
    Am J Dent; 1998 Oct; 11(5):219-24. PubMed ID: 10388380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of finishing time and techniques on marginal sealing ability of two composite restorative materials.
    Lopes GC; Franke M; Maia HP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2002 Jul; 88(1):32-6. PubMed ID: 12239477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Marginal microleakage of resin-modified glass-ionomer and composite resin restorations: effect of using etch-and-rinse and self-etch adhesives.
    Khoroushi M; Karvandi TM; Kamali B; Mazaheri H
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(3):378-83. PubMed ID: 23059577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Microleakage after thermocycling of 4 etch and rinse and 3 self-etch adhesives with and without a flowable composite lining.
    Guéders AM; Charpentier JF; Albert AI; Geerts SO
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):450-5. PubMed ID: 16924985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Directed polymerization shrinkage versus a horizontal incremental filling technique: interfacial adaptation in vivo in Class II cavities.
    van Dijken JW; Hörstedt P; Waern R
    Am J Dent; 1998 Aug; 11(4):165-72. PubMed ID: 10388370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contraction patterns in cavities tested with two dentin bonding agents.
    Soh G; Henderson LJ
    Oper Dent; 1990; 15(5):167-72. PubMed ID: 2098725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effect of new generation surface sealants on the marginal permeability of Class V resin composite restorations.
    Owens BM; Johnson WW
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(4):481-8. PubMed ID: 16924989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Bond strength of one-bottle dentin bonding agents on human dentin.
    Holderegger C; Paul SJ; Lüthy H; Schärer P
    Am J Dent; 1997 Apr; 10(2):71-6. PubMed ID: 9545893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Influence of resin composite shade and location of the gingival margin on the microleakage of posterior restorations.
    Araujo Fde O; Vieira LC; Monteiro Junior S
    Oper Dent; 2006; 31(5):556-61. PubMed ID: 17024943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.