These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

273 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33019639)

  • 1. Bioprintability: Physiomechanical and Biological Requirements of Materials for 3D Bioprinting Processes.
    Theus AS; Ning L; Hwang B; Gil C; Chen S; Wombwell A; Mehta R; Serpooshan V
    Polymers (Basel); 2020 Oct; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 33019639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bioprinting 101: Design, Fabrication, and Evaluation of Cell-Laden 3D Bioprinted Scaffolds.
    Deo KA; Singh KA; Peak CW; Alge DL; Gaharwar AK
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2020 Mar; 26(5-6):318-338. PubMed ID: 32079490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Simulations of 3D bioprinting: predicting bioprintability of nanofibrillar inks.
    Göhl J; Markstedt K; Mark A; Håkansson K; Gatenholm P; Edelvik F
    Biofabrication; 2018 Jun; 10(3):034105. PubMed ID: 29809162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advances in Extrusion 3D Bioprinting: A Focus on Multicomponent Hydrogel-Based Bioinks.
    Cui X; Li J; Hartanto Y; Durham M; Tang J; Zhang H; Hooper G; Lim K; Woodfield T
    Adv Healthc Mater; 2020 Aug; 9(15):e1901648. PubMed ID: 32352649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of bioink properties on printability and cell viability for 3D bioplotting of embryonic stem cells.
    Ouyang L; Yao R; Zhao Y; Sun W
    Biofabrication; 2016 Sep; 8(3):035020. PubMed ID: 27634915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. 3D bioprinting of molecularly engineered PEG-based hydrogels utilizing gelatin fragments.
    Piluso S; Skvortsov GA; Altunbek M; Afghah F; Khani N; Koç B; Patterson J
    Biofabrication; 2021 Aug; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 34192670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Alginate-Based Bioinks for 3D Bioprinting and Fabrication of Anatomically Accurate Bone Grafts.
    Gonzalez-Fernandez T; Tenorio AJ; Campbell KT; Silva EA; Leach JK
    Tissue Eng Part A; 2021 Sep; 27(17-18):1168-1181. PubMed ID: 33218292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Printability and Shape Fidelity of Bioinks in 3D Bioprinting.
    Schwab A; Levato R; D'Este M; Piluso S; Eglin D; Malda J
    Chem Rev; 2020 Oct; 120(19):11028-11055. PubMed ID: 32856892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Advancing bioinks for 3D bioprinting using reactive fillers: A review.
    Heid S; Boccaccini AR
    Acta Biomater; 2020 Sep; 113():1-22. PubMed ID: 32622053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. High-Fidelity Extrusion Bioprinting of Low-Printability Polymers Using Carbopol as a Rheology Modifier.
    Barreiro Carpio M; Gonzalez Martinez E; Dabaghi M; Ungureanu J; Arizpe Tafoya AV; Gonzalez Martinez DA; Hirota JA; Moran-Mirabal JM
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2023 Nov; 15(47):54234-54248. PubMed ID: 37964517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Assessment methodologies for extrusion-based bioink printability.
    Gillispie G; Prim P; Copus J; Fisher J; Mikos AG; Yoo JJ; Atala A; Lee SJ
    Biofabrication; 2020 Feb; 12(2):022003. PubMed ID: 31972558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Candidate Bioinks for Extrusion 3D Bioprinting-A Systematic Review of the Literature.
    Tarassoli SP; Jessop ZM; Jovic T; Hawkins K; Whitaker IS
    Front Bioeng Biotechnol; 2021; 9():616753. PubMed ID: 34722473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development and quantitative characterization of the precursor rheology of hyaluronic acid hydrogels for bioprinting.
    Kiyotake EA; Douglas AW; Thomas EE; Nimmo SL; Detamore MS
    Acta Biomater; 2019 Sep; 95():176-187. PubMed ID: 30669003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Printability in extrusion bioprinting.
    Fu Z; Naghieh S; Xu C; Wang C; Sun W; Chen X
    Biofabrication; 2021 Apr; 13(3):. PubMed ID: 33601340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Proposal to assess printability of bioinks for extrusion-based bioprinting and evaluation of rheological properties governing bioprintability.
    Paxton N; Smolan W; Böck T; Melchels F; Groll J; Jungst T
    Biofabrication; 2017 Nov; 9(4):044107. PubMed ID: 28930091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ECM Based Bioink for Tissue Mimetic 3D Bioprinting.
    Nam SY; Park SH
    Adv Exp Med Biol; 2018; 1064():335-353. PubMed ID: 30471042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Biomaterials / bioinks and extrusion bioprinting.
    Chen XB; Fazel Anvari-Yazdi A; Duan X; Zimmerling A; Gharraei R; Sharma NK; Sweilem S; Ning L
    Bioact Mater; 2023 Oct; 28():511-536. PubMed ID: 37435177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Physical and Chemical Factors Influencing the Printability of Hydrogel-based Extrusion Bioinks.
    Lee SC; Gillispie G; Prim P; Lee SJ
    Chem Rev; 2020 Oct; 120(19):10834-10886. PubMed ID: 32815369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The correlation between rheological properties and extrusion-based printability in bioink artifact quantification.
    Gillispie GJ; Copus J; Uzun-Per M; Yoo JJ; Atala A; Niazi MKK; Lee SJ
    Mater Des; 2023 Sep; 233():. PubMed ID: 37854951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Hydroxyethyl Cellulose As a Rheological Additive for Tuning the Extrusion Printability and Scaffold Properties.
    Li X; Deng Q; Wang S; Li Q; Zhao W; Lin B; Luo Y; Zhang X
    3D Print Addit Manuf; 2021 Apr; 8(2):87-98. PubMed ID: 36655060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.