153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3302014)
1. Tschermak: a non-discoverer of mendelism. II. A critique.
Monaghan FV; Corcos AF
J Hered; 1987; 78(3):208-10. PubMed ID: 3302014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The rediscovery of Mendelism in agricultural context: Erich von Tschermak as plant-breeder.
Harwood J
C R Acad Sci III; 2000 Dec; 323(12):1061-7. PubMed ID: 11147092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mendel had no "true" monohybrids.
Corcos A; Monaghan F
J Hered; 1984; 75(6):499-500. PubMed ID: 6392411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tschermak: a non-discoverer of Mendelism. I. An historical note.
Monaghan F; Corcos A
J Hered; 1986; 77(6):468-9. PubMed ID: 3549880
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Role of de Vries in the recovery of Mendel's work. I. Was de Vries really an independent discoverer of Mendel?
Corcos A; Monaghan F
J Hered; 1985; 76(3):187-90. PubMed ID: 3889132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Armin von Tschermak-Seysenegg (1870-1952): Physiologist and Co-'Rediscoverer' of Mendel's laws.
Simunek MV; Mielewczik M; Levit GS; Hossfeld U
Theory Biosci; 2017 Jun; 136(1-2):59-67. PubMed ID: 27738921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. On the origins of the Mendelian laws.
Monaghan F; Corcos A
J Hered; 1984; 75(1):67-9. PubMed ID: 6368675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. 'Further Development' of Mendel's legacy? Erich von Tschermak-Seysenegg in the context of Mendelian-biometry controversy, 1901-1906.
Simunek M; Hoßfeld U; Breidbach O
Theory Biosci; 2012 Dec; 131(4):243-52. PubMed ID: 22855371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correns, an independent discoverer of Mendelism? I. An historical/critical note.
Corcos AF; Monaghan FV
J Hered; 1987; 78(5):330. PubMed ID: 3316376
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Mendel and modern genetics: the legacy for today.
Allen GE
Endeavour; 2003 Jun; 27(2):63-8. PubMed ID: 12798810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Mendelism in animal breeding as developed by professor Leopold Frateur, Louvain (1877-1946)].
Gobin A
Argos; 2000; (23):111-8. PubMed ID: 12051273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Hugo De Vries: from the theory of intracellular pangenesis to the rediscovery of Mendel.
Lenay C
C R Acad Sci III; 2000 Dec; 323(12):1053-60. PubMed ID: 11147091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Darwin and Mendel: who was the pioneer of genetics?
Liu Y
Riv Biol; 2005; 98(2):305-22. PubMed ID: 16180199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Karl Pearson's mathematization of inheritance: from ancestral heredity to Mendelian genetics (1895-1909).
Magnello ME
Ann Sci; 1998 Jan; 55(1):35-94. PubMed ID: 11619806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fisher's contributions to genetics and heredity, with special emphasis on the Gregor Mendel controversy.
Piegorsch WW
Biometrics; 1990 Dec; 46(4):915-24. PubMed ID: 2085640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. From phenotype to genotype: celebrating 150 years of Mendelian genetics in plant breeding research.
Vollmann J; Buerstmayr H
Theor Appl Genet; 2016 Dec; 129(12):2237-2239. PubMed ID: 27844115
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Mendel, linkage, and synteny.
Novitski E; Blixt S
Bioscience; 1978 Jan; 28(1):34-5. PubMed ID: 340295
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Historical study: Johann Gregor Mendel 1822-1884.
Weiling F
Am J Med Genet; 1991 Jul; 40(1):1-25; discussion 26. PubMed ID: 1887835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Hugo de Vries on heredity, 1889-1903. Statistics, Mendelian laws, pangenes, mutations.
Stamhuis IH; Meijer OG; Zevenhuizen EJ
Isis; 1999 Jun; 90(2):238-67. PubMed ID: 10439561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Limits of imagination: the 150th Anniversary of Mendel's Laws, and why Mendel failed to see the importance of his discovery for Darwin's theory of evolution.
Singh RS
Genome; 2015 Sep; 58(9):415-21. PubMed ID: 26372894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
