These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
380 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33020417)
21. Influence of Preparation Type and Tooth Geometry on the Accuracy of Different Intraoral Scanners. Ashraf Y; Sabet A; Hamdy A; Ebeid K J Prosthodont; 2020 Dec; 29(9):800-804. PubMed ID: 32406156 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Clinical Study of the Influence of Ambient Light Scanning Conditions on the Accuracy (Trueness and Precision) of an Intraoral Scanner. Revilla-León M; Subramanian SG; Özcan M; Krishnamurthy VR J Prosthodont; 2020 Feb; 29(2):107-113. PubMed ID: 31860144 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Accuracy of 3D Printed Model Acquired from Different Types of Intra Oral Scanners and 3D Printers. Joteppa V; Niras S; Chokhani D; Jadhao TA; Bandgar ST; Bayaskar SG J Pharm Bioallied Sci; 2024 Apr; 16(Suppl 2):S1433-S1434. PubMed ID: 38882882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Comparative reproducibility analysis of 6 intraoral scanners used on complex intracoronal preparations. Park JM; Kim RJ; Lee KW J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Jan; 123(1):113-120. PubMed ID: 31027953 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Influence of rescanning mesh holes and stitching procedures on the complete-arch scanning accuracy of an intraoral scanner: An in vitro study. Gómez-Polo M; Piedra-Cascón W; Methani MM; Quesada-Olmo N; Farjas-Abadia M; Revilla-León M J Dent; 2021 Jul; 110():103690. PubMed ID: 33991598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Trueness of digital intraoral impression in reproducing multiple implant position. Kim RJ; Benic GI; Park JM PLoS One; 2019; 14(11):e0222070. PubMed ID: 31743331 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Impact of different scanning strategies on the accuracy of two current intraoral scanning systems in complete-arch impressions: an in vitro study. Passos L; Meiga S; Brigagão V; Street A Int J Comput Dent; 2019; 22(4):307-319. PubMed ID: 31840139 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Trueness and surface characteristics of 3-dimensional printed casts made with different technologies. Young Kim RJ; Cho SM; Jung WS; Park JM J Prosthet Dent; 2024 Dec; 132(6):1324.e1-1324.e11. PubMed ID: 36635136 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparative Analysis of Fused Deposition Modeling and Digital Light Processing Techniques for Dimensional Accuracy in Clear Aligner Manufacturing. Grzebieluch W; Grajzer M; Mikulewicz M Med Sci Monit; 2023 Aug; 29():e940922. PubMed ID: 37533235 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparing the accuracy of six intraoral scanners on prepared teeth and effect of scanning sequence. Diker B; Tak Ö J Adv Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 12(5):299-306. PubMed ID: 33149851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. In Vitro Trueness and Precision of Intraoral Scanners in a Four-Implant Complete-Arch Model. Spagopoulos D; Kaisarlis G; Spagopoulou F; Halazonetis DJ; Güth JF; Papazoglou E Dent J (Basel); 2023 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 36661564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Complete-arch accuracy of intraoral scanners. Treesh JC; Liacouras PC; Taft RM; Brooks DI; Raiciulescu S; Ellert DO; Grant GT; Ye L J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Sep; 120(3):382-388. PubMed ID: 29724554 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Three-Dimensional Evaluation on Accuracy of Conventional and Milled Gypsum Models and 3D Printed Photopolymer Models. Choi JW; Ahn JJ; Son K; Huh JB Materials (Basel); 2019 Oct; 12(21):. PubMed ID: 31731447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In-vitro accuracy of casts for orthodontic purposes obtained by a conventional and by a printer workflow. Reich S; Herstell H; Raith S; Kühne C; Berndt S PLoS One; 2023; 18(3):e0282840. PubMed ID: 36920945 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Scanning Accuracy of 10 Intraoral Scanners for Single-crown and Three-unit Fixed Denture Preparations: An In Vitro Study. Zhang XY; Cao Y; Hu ZW; Wang Y; Chen H; Sun YC Chin J Dent Res; 2022 Sep; 25(3):215-222. PubMed ID: 36102891 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. Mangano FG; Hauschild U; Veronesi G; Imburgia M; Mangano C; Admakin O BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun; 19(1):101. PubMed ID: 31170969 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparing the accuracy (trueness and precision) of models of fixed dental prostheses fabricated by digital and conventional workflows. Sim JY; Jang Y; Kim WC; Kim HY; Lee DH; Kim JH J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Jan; 63(1):25-30. PubMed ID: 29615324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Trueness evaluation of digital impression: The impact of the selection of reference and test object. Yatmaz BB; Raith S; Reich S J Dent; 2021 Aug; 111():103706. PubMed ID: 34077800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Accuracy of computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing-generated dental casts based on intraoral scanner data. Patzelt SB; Bishti S; Stampf S; Att W J Am Dent Assoc; 2014 Nov; 145(11):1133-40. PubMed ID: 25359645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of Tooth Types on the Accuracy of Dental 3D Scanners: An In Vitro Study. Son K; Lee KB Materials (Basel); 2020 Apr; 13(7):. PubMed ID: 32283591 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]