These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33020526)

  • 1. Development of panorama resolution phantom for comprehensive evaluation of the horizontal and vertical resolution of panoramic radiography.
    Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC; Lee SJ
    Sci Rep; 2020 Oct; 10(1):16529. PubMed ID: 33020526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Correlation between spatial resolution and ball distortion rate of panoramic radiography.
    Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    BMC Med Imaging; 2020 Jun; 20(1):68. PubMed ID: 32560631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Development of a new ball-type phantom for evaluation of the image layer of panoramic radiography.
    Yeom HG; Kim JE; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Lee SS; Choi SC
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2018 Dec; 48(4):255-259. PubMed ID: 30607349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Panoramic radiography in dental diagnostics.
    Molander B
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 119():1-26. PubMed ID: 8971997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Panoramic dental radiography using a charge-coupled device receptor.
    Farman AG; Farman TT
    J Digit Imaging; 1998 Aug; 11(3 Suppl 1):166-8. PubMed ID: 9735460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Effect of positioning errors on magnification factors in the mandible in digital panorama imaging].
    Schulze R; Schalldach F; d'Hoedt B
    Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir; 2000 May; 4(3):164-70. PubMed ID: 10900960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the panoramic image formation in different anatomic positions.
    Ladeira DB; Cruz AD; Almeida SM; Bóscolo FN
    Braz Dent J; 2010; 21(5):458-62. PubMed ID: 21180804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Preliminary evaluation of a digital system for rotational panoramic radiography.
    Dove SB; McDavid WD; Welander U; Tronje G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1992 May; 73(5):623-32. PubMed ID: 1518653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Characterizing the modulation transfer function (MTF) of proton/carbon radiography using Monte Carlo simulations.
    Seco J; Oumano M; Depauw N; Dias MF; Teixeira RP; Spadea MF
    Med Phys; 2013 Sep; 40(9):091717. PubMed ID: 24007150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetry analysis of panoramic-imaging devices in different-sized phantoms.
    Wahid MA; Choi E; MacDonald DS; Ford NL
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):197-205. PubMed ID: 28300383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reference line-pair values of panoramic radiographs using an arch-form phantom stand to assess clinical image quality.
    Choi DH; Choi BR; Choi JW; Huh KH; Yi WJ; Heo MS; Choi SC; Lee SS
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2013 Mar; 43(1):7-15. PubMed ID: 23526047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Image quality in panoramic radiography.
    Molander B; Ahlqwist M; Gröndahl HG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Feb; 24(1):17-22. PubMed ID: 8593902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A dual-view digital tomosynthesis imaging technique for improved chest imaging.
    Zhong Y; Lai CJ; Wang T; Shaw CC
    Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 42(9):5238-51. PubMed ID: 26328973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography with respect to contrast and spatial resolution in tissue equivalent breast phantoms.
    Kuzmiak CM; Pisano ED; Cole EB; Zeng D; Burns CB; Roberto C; Pavic D; Lee Y; Seo BK; Koomen M; Washburn D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3144-50. PubMed ID: 16279068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Characteristics of the Orthopantomograph OP 100.
    Scarfe WC; Eraso FE; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Jan; 27(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 9482025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An evaluation of spatial resolution of a prototype proton CT scanner.
    Plautz TE; Bashkirov V; Giacometti V; Hurley RF; Johnson RP; Piersimoni P; Sadrozinski HF; Schulte RW; Zatserklyaniy A
    Med Phys; 2016 Dec; 43(12):6291. PubMed ID: 27908179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Measurement of mesiodistal root angulation for panoramic images and the effect of buccolingual root angulation].
    Garcia-Figueroa MA; Raboud DW; Lam EW; Heo G; Major PW
    Int Orthod; 2009 Mar; 7(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 20303900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative evaluation of measurement accuracy for three-dimensional angiography system using various phantoms.
    Yamura M; Hirai T; Korogi Y; Ikushima I; Yamashita Y
    Radiat Med; 2005 May; 23(3):175-81. PubMed ID: 15940064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of experimental phantoms to determine the accuracy and reliability of mandibular cortical width measurements by panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography.
    Hayashi Y; Ito M; Imanishi Y; Watanabe K; Matsumoto K; Arai Y; Honda K
    J Oral Sci; 2020 Jun; 62(3):303-307. PubMed ID: 32522912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Accuracy of dimensional and angular measurements from panoramic and lateral oblique radiographs.
    Wyatt DL; Farman AG; Orbell GM; Silveira AM; Scarfe WC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):225-31. PubMed ID: 9161166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.