154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33020693)
1. Distressed in the queue? Psychophysiological and behavioral evidence for two alternative car-following techniques.
Lucas-Alba A; Melchor ÓM; Hernando A; Fernández-Martín A; Blanch-Micó MT; Lombas AS
Transp Res Part F Traffic Psychol Behav; 2020 Oct; 74():418-432. PubMed ID: 33020693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Quantifying effects of reverse linear perspective as a visual cue on vehicle and platoon crash risk variations in car-following using path analysis.
Ding N; Lu Z; Jiao N; Liu Z; Lu L
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106215. PubMed ID: 34130057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of road infrastructure and traffic complexity in speed adaptation behaviour of distracted drivers.
Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Haque MM; King M; Washington S
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Apr; 101():67-77. PubMed ID: 28189943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of peripheral transverse line markings on drivers' speed and headway choice and crash risk in car-following: A naturalistic observation study.
Ding N; Zhu S; Jiao N; Liu B
Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105701. PubMed ID: 32823033
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing drivers' visual attention at Junctions in Real and Simulated Environments.
Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
Appl Ergon; 2019 Oct; 80():89-101. PubMed ID: 31280814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK.
Pariota L; Bifulco GN; Galante F; Montella A; Brackstone M
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():74-87. PubMed ID: 26828955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparing car drivers' and motorcyclists' opinions about junction crashes.
Robbins CJ; Allen HA; Chapman P
Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Aug; 117():304-317. PubMed ID: 29753219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Glass half-full: On-road glance metrics differentiate crashes from near-crashes in the 100-Car data.
Seppelt BD; Seaman S; Lee J; Angell LS; Mehler B; Reimer B
Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Oct; 107():48-62. PubMed ID: 28787612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Analysis of naturalistic driving videos of fleet services drivers to estimate driver error and potentially distracting behaviors as risk factors for rear-end versus angle crashes.
Harland KK; Carney C; McGehee D
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Jul; 17(5):465-71. PubMed ID: 26760293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of mobile phone use on car-following behaviour of young drivers.
Saifuzzaman M; Haque MM; Zheng Z; Washington S
Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Sep; 82():10-9. PubMed ID: 26009990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
Gao J; Davis GA
J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Road traffic accidents and self-reported Portuguese car driver's attitudes, behaviors, and opinions: Are they related?
Bon de Sousa T; Santos C; Mateus C; Areal A; Trigoso J; Nunes C
Traffic Inj Prev; 2016 Oct; 17(7):705-11. PubMed ID: 26889832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of daily car-following behaviors on urban roadway rear-end crashes and near-crashes: A naturalistic driving study.
Wang X; Zhang X; Guo F; Gu Y; Zhu X
Accid Anal Prev; 2022 Jan; 164():106502. PubMed ID: 34837850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of headway distance and car speed on drivers' decisions to answer an incoming call.
Pouyakian M; Mahabadi HA; Yazdi SM; Hajizadeh E; Nahvi A
Traffic Inj Prev; 2013; 14(7):749-55. PubMed ID: 23944976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Structural equations modeling of real-time crash risk variation in car-following incorporating visual perceptual, vehicular, and roadway factors.
Ding N; Jiao N; Zhu S; Liu B
Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Dec; 133():105298. PubMed ID: 31557617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Truck Platooning Under Real Traffic Conditions: First Insights on Behavioral Adaptations and Gap Preference of Professional Drivers.
Castritius SM; Dietz CJ; Schubert P; Moeller J; Morvilius S; Hammer S; Tran CA; Haas CT
Hum Factors; 2021 Sep; 63(6):1033-1045. PubMed ID: 32149526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Sleep-deprived car-following: Indicators of rear-end crash potential.
Mahajan K; Velaga NR
Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jun; 156():106123. PubMed ID: 33862404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Analysis of near crashes among teen, young adult, and experienced adult drivers using the SHRP2 naturalistic driving study.
Seacrist T; Douglas EC; Huang E; Megariotis J; Prabahar A; Kashem A; Elzarka A; Haber L; MacKinney T; Loeb H
Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(sup1):S89-S96. PubMed ID: 29584473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The effects of cyclists present at rural intersections on speed behavior and workload of car drivers: a driving simulator study.
Duivenvoorden K; Hogema J; Hagenzieker M; Wegman F
Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16():254-9. PubMed ID: 25000155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
