These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33022174)

  • 1. Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Process for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships.
    DiFranzo A; Sheridan RP; Liaw A; Tudor M
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Oct; 60(10):4653-4663. PubMed ID: 33022174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. On nearest-neighbor Gaussian process models for massive spatial data.
    Datta A; Banerjee S; Finley AO; Gelfand AE
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Comput Stat; 2016; 8(5):162-171. PubMed ID: 29657666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. General Approach to Estimate Error Bars for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Predictions of Molecular Activity.
    Liu R; Glover KP; Feasel MG; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2018 Aug; 58(8):1561-1575. PubMed ID: 29949366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A probabilistic molecular fingerprint for big data settings.
    Probst D; Reymond JL
    J Cheminform; 2018 Dec; 10(1):66. PubMed ID: 30564943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hierarchical Nearest-Neighbor Gaussian Process Models for Large Geostatistical Datasets.
    Datta A; Banerjee S; Finley AO; Gelfand AE
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2016; 111(514):800-812. PubMed ID: 29720777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Using particle swarms for the development of QSAR models based on K-nearest neighbor and kernel regression.
    Cedeño W; Agrafiotis DK
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2003; 17(2-4):255-63. PubMed ID: 13677491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. kappa Nearest neighbors QSAR modeling as a variational problem: theory and applications.
    Itskowitz P; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2005; 45(3):777-85. PubMed ID: 15921467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Enhancing Acute Oral Toxicity Predictions by using Consensus Modeling and Algebraic Form-Based 0D-to-2D Molecular Encodes.
    García-Jacas CR; Marrero-Ponce Y; Cortés-Guzmán F; Suárez-Lezcano J; Martinez-Rios FO; García-González LA; Pupo-Meriño M; Martinez-Mayorga K
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2019 Jun; 32(6):1178-1192. PubMed ID: 31066547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extreme Gradient Boosting as a Method for Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships.
    Sheridan RP; Wang WM; Liaw A; Ma J; Gifford EM
    J Chem Inf Model; 2016 Dec; 56(12):2353-2360. PubMed ID: 27958738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scalable Predictions for Spatial Probit Linear Mixed Models Using Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Processes.
    Saha A; Datta A; Banerjee S
    J Data Sci; 2022; 20(4):533-544. PubMed ID: 37786782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparing the Influence of Simulated Experimental Errors on 12 Machine Learning Algorithms in Bioactivity Modeling Using 12 Diverse Data Sets.
    Cortes-Ciriano I; Bender A; Malliavin TE
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Jul; 55(7):1413-25. PubMed ID: 26038978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scalable partitioning and exploration of chemical spaces using geometric hashing.
    Dutta D; Guha R; Jurs PC; Chen T
    J Chem Inf Model; 2006; 46(1):321-33. PubMed ID: 16426067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Does rational selection of training and test sets improve the outcome of QSAR modeling?
    Martin TM; Harten P; Young DM; Muratov EN; Golbraikh A; Zhu H; Tropsha A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2012 Oct; 52(10):2570-8. PubMed ID: 23030316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Building of Robust and Interpretable QSAR Classification Models by Means of the Rivality Index.
    Luque Ruiz I; Gómez-Nieto MÁ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jun; 59(6):2785-2804. PubMed ID: 31136171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Critically Assessing the Predictive Power of QSAR Models for Human Liver Microsomal Stability.
    Liu R; Schyman P; Wallqvist A
    J Chem Inf Model; 2015 Aug; 55(8):1566-75. PubMed ID: 26170251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Gaussian processes for classification: QSAR modeling of ADMET and target activity.
    Obrezanova O; Segall MD
    J Chem Inf Model; 2010 Jun; 50(6):1053-61. PubMed ID: 20433177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Efficient algorithms for Bayesian Nearest Neighbor Gaussian Processes.
    Finley AO; Datta A; Cook BC; Morton DC; Andersen HE; Banerjee S
    J Comput Graph Stat; 2019; 28(2):401-414. PubMed ID: 31543693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model fitting for small skin permeability data sets: hyperparameter optimisation in Gaussian Process Regression.
    Ashrafi P; Sun Y; Davey N; Adams RG; Wilkinson SC; Moss GP
    J Pharm Pharmacol; 2018 Mar; 70(3):361-373. PubMed ID: 29341138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. nnSVG for the scalable identification of spatially variable genes using nearest-neighbor Gaussian processes.
    Weber LM; Saha A; Datta A; Hansen KD; Hicks SC
    Nat Commun; 2023 Jul; 14(1):4059. PubMed ID: 37429865
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exploring non-linear distance metrics in the structure-activity space: QSAR models for human estrogen receptor.
    Balabin IA; Judson RS
    J Cheminform; 2018 Sep; 10(1):47. PubMed ID: 30229396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.