These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33022475)

  • 1. Investigating what level of visual information inspires trust in a user of a highly automated vehicle.
    Ma RHY; Morris A; Herriotts P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Jan; 90():103272. PubMed ID: 33022475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Drivers trust, acceptance, and takeover behaviors in fully automated vehicles: Effects of automated driving styles and driver's driving styles.
    Ma Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Sep; 159():106238. PubMed ID: 34182321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Introduction matters: Manipulating trust in automation and reliance in automated driving.
    Körber M; Baseler E; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2018 Jan; 66():18-31. PubMed ID: 28958427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Improvement of driver active interventions during automated driving by displaying trajectory pointers-A driving simulator study.
    Ono S; Sasaki H; Kumon H; Fuwamoto Y; Kondo S; Narumi T; Tanikawa T; Hirose M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup1):S152-S156. PubMed ID: 31381449
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Psychosocial factors associated with intended use of automated vehicles: A simulated driving study.
    Buckley L; Kaye SA; Pradhan AK
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jun; 115():202-208. PubMed ID: 29631216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Get Ready for Being Chauffeured : Passenger's Preferences and Trust While Being Driven by Human and Automation.
    Mühl K; Strauch C; Grabmaier C; Reithinger S; Huckauf A; Baumann M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Dec; 62(8):1322-1338. PubMed ID: 31498656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Why Do I Have to Drive Now? Post Hoc Explanations of Takeover Requests.
    Körber M; Prasch L; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2018 May; 60(3):305-323. PubMed ID: 29283269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Exploring drivers' mental workload and visual demand while using an in-vehicle HMI for eco-safe driving.
    Li X; Vaezipour A; Rakotonirainy A; Demmel S; Oviedo-Trespalacios O
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Oct; 146():105756. PubMed ID: 32919220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. In a heart beat: Using driver's physiological changes to determine the quality of a takeover in highly automated vehicles.
    Alrefaie MT; Summerskill S; Jackon TW
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Oct; 131():180-190. PubMed ID: 31302486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Exploring Trust in Self-Driving Vehicles Through Text Analysis.
    Lee JD; Kolodge K
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):260-277. PubMed ID: 31502885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of automation trust in drivers' visual distraction during automation.
    Zhang Y; Ma J; Pan C; Chang R
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(9):e0257201. PubMed ID: 34520500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The More You Know: Trust Dynamics and Calibration in Highly Automated Driving and the Effects of Take-Overs, System Malfunction, and System Transparency.
    Kraus J; Scholz D; Stiegemeier D; Baumann M
    Hum Factors; 2020 Aug; 62(5):718-736. PubMed ID: 31233695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can We Study Autonomous Driving Comfort in Moving-Base Driving Simulators? A Validation Study.
    Bellem H; Klüver M; Schrauf M; Schöner HP; Hecht H; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):442-456. PubMed ID: 28005453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Automation transparency: implications of uncertainty communication for human-automation interaction and interfaces.
    Kunze A; Summerskill SJ; Marshall R; Filtness AJ
    Ergonomics; 2019 Mar; 62(3):345-360. PubMed ID: 30501566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Keep Your Scanners Peeled: Gaze Behavior as a Measure of Automation Trust During Highly Automated Driving.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Vilimek R; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):509-19. PubMed ID: 26843570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. From partial and high automation to manual driving: Relationship between non-driving related tasks, drowsiness and take-over performance.
    Naujoks F; Höfling S; Purucker C; Zeeb K
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Dec; 121():28-42. PubMed ID: 30205284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Modeling takeover behavior in level 3 automated driving via a structural equation model: Considering the mediating role of trust.
    Jin M; Lu G; Chen F; Shi X; Tan H; Zhai J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106156. PubMed ID: 33957474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does initial experience affect consumers' intention to use autonomous vehicles? Evidence from a field experiment in Beijing.
    Dai J; Li R; Liu Z
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105778. PubMed ID: 33166760
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Taking Over Control From Highly Automated Vehicles in Complex Traffic Situations: The Role of Traffic Density.
    Gold C; Körber M; Lechner D; Bengler K
    Hum Factors; 2016 Jun; 58(4):642-52. PubMed ID: 26984515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How users of automated vehicles benefit from predictive ambient light displays.
    Hecht T; Weng S; Kick LF; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2022 Sep; 103():103762. PubMed ID: 35472490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.