These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33022475)

  • 21. Fully Automated Driving: Impact of Trust and Practice on Manual Control Recovery.
    Payre W; Cestac J; Delhomme P
    Hum Factors; 2016 Mar; 58(2):229-41. PubMed ID: 26646299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Speech Auditory Alerts Promote Memory for Alerted Events in a Video-Simulated Self-Driving Car Ride.
    Nees MA; Helbein B; Porter A
    Hum Factors; 2016 May; 58(3):416-26. PubMed ID: 26884437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Happiness and high reliability develop affective trust in in-vehicle agents.
    Zieger S; Dong J; Taylor S; Sanford C; Jeon M
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1129294. PubMed ID: 36998376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Impact of the connected vehicle environment on tunnel entrance zone.
    Li Z; Xing G; Zhao X; Li H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jul; 157():106145. PubMed ID: 34020757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. User expectations of partial driving automation capabilities and their effect on information design preferences in the vehicle.
    Ulahannan A; Cain R; Thompson S; Skrypchuk L; Mouzakitis A; Jennings P; Birrell S
    Appl Ergon; 2020 Jan; 82():102969. PubMed ID: 31600714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Calibration of Trust in Automated Driving: A Matter of Initial Level of Trust and Automated Driving Style?
    Manchon JB; Bueno M; Navarro J
    Hum Factors; 2023 Dec; 65(8):1613-1629. PubMed ID: 34861787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Prior Familiarization With Takeover Requests Affects Drivers' Takeover Performance and Automation Trust.
    Hergeth S; Lorenz L; Krems JF
    Hum Factors; 2017 May; 59(3):457-470. PubMed ID: 27923886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Acceptance of Full Driving Automation: Personally Owned and Shared-Use Concepts.
    Motamedi S; Wang P; Zhang T; Chan CY
    Hum Factors; 2020 Mar; 62(2):288-309. PubMed ID: 31469591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Older adults' acceptance of fully automated vehicles: Effects of exposure, driving style, age, and driving conditions.
    Haghzare S; Campos JL; Bak K; Mihailidis A
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Feb; 150():105919. PubMed ID: 33310647
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Improving the driver-automation interaction: an approach using automation uncertainty.
    Beller J; Heesen M; Vollrath M
    Hum Factors; 2013 Dec; 55(6):1130-41. PubMed ID: 24745204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effect of automation failure type on trust development in driving automation systems.
    Mishler S; Chen J
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103913. PubMed ID: 36201967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. An experimental study to investigate design and assessment criteria: What is important for communication between pedestrians and automated vehicles?
    Ackermann C; Beggiato M; Schubert S; Krems JF
    Appl Ergon; 2019 Feb; 75():272-282. PubMed ID: 30509537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Multimodal interface and reliability displays: Effect on attention, mode awareness, and trust in partially automated vehicles.
    Monsaingeon N; Caroux L; Langlois S; Lemercier C
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1107847. PubMed ID: 36935967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluate driver response to active warning system in level-2 automated vehicles.
    Atwood JR; Guo F; Blanco M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jul; 128():132-138. PubMed ID: 31005004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Age-related differences in effects of non-driving related tasks on takeover performance in automated driving.
    Wu Y; Kihara K; Hasegawa K; Takeda Y; Sato T; Akamatsu M; Kitazaki S
    J Safety Res; 2020 Feb; 72():231-238. PubMed ID: 32199568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Naming is framing: The framing effect of technology name on public attitude toward automated vehicles.
    Liu P; Fei Q; Liu J; Wang J
    Public Underst Sci; 2021 Aug; 30(6):691-707. PubMed ID: 33509049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Communication via motion - Suitability of automated vehicle movements to negotiate the right of way in road bottleneck scenarios.
    Rettenmaier M; Dinkel S; Bengler K
    Appl Ergon; 2021 Sep; 95():103438. PubMed ID: 33895469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.