These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

261 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33022511)

  • 1. How do drivers respond to driving risk during car-following? Risk-response driver model and its application in human-like longitudinal control.
    Zhao X; He R; Wang J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Dec; 148():105783. PubMed ID: 33022511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the impact of HMI on drivers' merging performance in intelligent connected vehicle environment.
    Wang Y; Lyu N; Wu C; Du Z; Deng M; Wu H
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Apr; 198():107448. PubMed ID: 38340472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Safer than the average human driver (who is less safe than me)? Examining a popular safety benchmark for self-driving cars.
    Nees MA
    J Safety Res; 2019 Jun; 69():61-68. PubMed ID: 31235236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Advanced vehicle technologies and road safety: A scoping review of the evidence.
    Furlan AD; Kajaks T; Tiong M; Lavallière M; Campos JL; Babineau J; Haghzare S; Ma T; Vrkljan B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Nov; 147():105741. PubMed ID: 32979820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. LAVIA--an evaluation of the potential safety benefits of the French intelligent speed adaptation project.
    Driscoll R; Page Y; Lassarre S; Ehrlich J
    Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med; 2007; 51():485-505. PubMed ID: 18184509
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Modeling Car-Following Behaviors and Driving Styles with Generative Adversarial Imitation Learning.
    Zhou Y; Fu R; Wang C; Zhang R
    Sensors (Basel); 2020 Sep; 20(18):. PubMed ID: 32899773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Longitudinal control behaviour: Analysis and modelling based on experimental surveys in Italy and the UK.
    Pariota L; Bifulco GN; Galante F; Montella A; Brackstone M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Apr; 89():74-87. PubMed ID: 26828955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective cues for accelerating young drivers' time to transfer control following a period of conditional automation.
    Wright TJ; Agrawal R; Samuel S; Wang Y; Zilberstein S; Fisher DL
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jul; 116():14-20. PubMed ID: 29031513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Effect of Partial Automation on Driver Attention: A Naturalistic Driving Study.
    Gaspar J; Carney C
    Hum Factors; 2019 Dec; 61(8):1261-1276. PubMed ID: 30920852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. In-vehicle displays to support driver anticipation of traffic conflicts in automated vehicles.
    He D; Kanaan D; Donmez B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105842. PubMed ID: 33157393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Young drivers and their cars: Safe and sound or the perfect storm?
    Oviedo-Trespalacios O; Scott-Parker B
    Accid Anal Prev; 2018 Jan; 110():18-28. PubMed ID: 29080470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A positive view on road safety: Can 'car karma' contribute to safe driving styles?
    Kleisen LM
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():705-12. PubMed ID: 22789431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Mileage, car ownership, experience of punishment avoidance, and the risky driving of young drivers.
    Scott-Parker B; Watson B; King MJ; Hyde MK
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2011 Dec; 12(6):559-67. PubMed ID: 22133331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Driver behavior and the use of automation in real-world driving.
    Gershon P; Seaman S; Mehler B; Reimer B; Coughlin J
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Aug; 158():106217. PubMed ID: 34087506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Fatal crash between a car operating with automated control systems and a tractor-semitrailer truck.
    Poland K; McKay MP; Bruce D; Becic E
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018; 19(sup2):S153-S156. PubMed ID: 30841795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Does assisted driving behavior lead to safety-critical encounters with unequipped vehicles' drivers?
    Preuk K; Stemmler E; Schießl C; Jipp M
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Oct; 95(Pt A):149-56. PubMed ID: 27442594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Safety assessment for autonomous vehicles: A reference driver model for highway merging scenarios.
    Wang C; Guo F; Zhao S; Zhu Z; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 Oct; 206():107710. PubMed ID: 39018627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantifying vehicle control from physiology in type 1 diabetes.
    Chakraborty P; Merickel J; Shah V; Sharma A; Hegde C; Desouza C; Drincic A; Gunaratne P; Rizzo M
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2019; 20(sup2):S26-S31. PubMed ID: 31617757
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding take-over performance of high crash risk drivers during conditionally automated driving.
    Lin Q; Li S; Ma X; Lu G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2020 Aug; 143():105543. PubMed ID: 32485431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Optical information for car following: the driving by visual angle (DVA) model.
    Andersen GJ; Sauer CW
    Hum Factors; 2007 Oct; 49(5):878-96. PubMed ID: 17915604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.