263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33022673)
1. Developing a Machine Learning Algorithm for Identifying Abnormal Urothelial Cells: A Feasibility Study.
Zhang Z; Fu X; Liu J; Huang Z; Liu N; Fang F; Rao J
Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(4):335-341. PubMed ID: 33022673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Causes of false-negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology.
Lee PJ; Owens CL; Lithgow MY; Jiang Z; Fischer AH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Dec; 44(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 27781412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An institutional experience evaluating hTERT immunostaining in 100 consecutive ThinPrep urine specimens.
Xing J; Han M; Monaco SE; Dhir R; Roy S; Pantanowitz L
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 32354607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Urinary tract cytology: a cytologic-histopathologic correlation with The Paris System, an institutional study.
Danakas A; Sweeney M; Cheris S; Agrawal T
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 33132054
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology.
Roy M; Kaushal S; Jain D; Seth A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR
Cytopathology; 2017 Dec; 28(6):509-515. PubMed ID: 28833848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology in daily practice with emphasis on ancillary testing by multiprobe FISH.
Vlajnic T; Gut A; Savic S; Bubendorf L
J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 73(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 31467041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.
Celik B; Kavas G
Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 36731438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens.
McIntire PJ; Snow JT; Elsoukkary SS; Soong L; Sweeney J; Robinson BD; Siddiqui MT
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Feb; 127(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 30395388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Two-year study on the application of the Paris system for urinary cytology in a cancer centre.
de Paula R; Oliveira A; Nunes W; Bovolim G; Domingos T; De Brot L; Bezerra S; Cunha I; Morini M; Saieg M
Cytopathology; 2020 Jan; 31(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 31654587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cytohistological correlation of urine cytology in a tertiary centre with application of the Paris system.
Rohilla M; Singh P; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Dey P; Kakkar N
Cytopathology; 2018 Oct; 29(5):436-443. PubMed ID: 29920811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection.
Zheng X; Si Q; Du D; Harshan M; Zhang Z; Haines K; Shi W; Chhieng DC
Cytopathology; 2018 Apr; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29251368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of urine cytology diagnostic reports before and after the implementation of the Paris System classification system in China.
Ma C; Zhang L
Cytopathology; 2020 Sep; 31(5):457-462. PubMed ID: 32246545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of Implementing the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology in the Performance of Urine Cytology: A Correlative Study of 124 Cases.
Hassan M; Solanki S; Kassouf W; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Auger M; Brimo F
Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 146(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 27543983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The Paris System "atypical urothelial cells" category: can the current criteria be improved?
Vosoughi A; Ordobazari A; Lora Gonzalez MA; Guido LP; Skiba M; Campuzano-Zuluaga G; Kryvenko ON; Gomez-Fernandez C; Garcia-Buitrago M; Jorda M
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 32732113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Performance of an artificial intelligence algorithm for reporting urine cytopathology.
Sanghvi AB; Allen EZ; Callenberg KM; Pantanowitz L
Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Oct; 127(10):658-666. PubMed ID: 31412169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A new 7-point method facilitates accurate diagnosis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma in routine urinary cytology practice.
Iwai S; Mimura A; Ohtani H; Shimokama T; Kinjo M
J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):103-109. PubMed ID: 33092994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cytologic evaluation of upper urinary tract specimens: An institutional retrospective study using The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology second edition with histopathologic follow-up.
Khajir G; Sun T; Wang H; Sprenkle PC; Adeniran AJ; Cai G; Levi AW
Cytopathology; 2024 Mar; 35(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 37916579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The clinical significance of class III (suspicious) urine cytology.
Sternberg I; Rona R; Olsfanger S; Lew S; Leibovitch I
Cytopathology; 2011 Oct; 22(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 21114557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The application of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Template on urine cytology.
Wu HH; Redelman M; Chen S; Grignon DJ; Cramer HM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Aug; 43(8):593-7. PubMed ID: 25721938
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Applying the Paris system for reporting urine cytology to challenging cytology cases.
Glass R; Rosca O; Raab S; Szabelska J; Chau K; Sheikh-Fayyaz S; Cocker R
Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jul; 47(7):675-681. PubMed ID: 31017746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
