BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33022673)

  • 1. Developing a Machine Learning Algorithm for Identifying Abnormal Urothelial Cells: A Feasibility Study.
    Zhang Z; Fu X; Liu J; Huang Z; Liu N; Fang F; Rao J
    Acta Cytol; 2021; 65(4):335-341. PubMed ID: 33022673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Causes of false-negative for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology.
    Lee PJ; Owens CL; Lithgow MY; Jiang Z; Fischer AH
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2016 Dec; 44(12):994-999. PubMed ID: 27781412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An institutional experience evaluating hTERT immunostaining in 100 consecutive ThinPrep urine specimens.
    Xing J; Han M; Monaco SE; Dhir R; Roy S; Pantanowitz L
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):88-93. PubMed ID: 32354607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Urinary tract cytology: a cytologic-histopathologic correlation with The Paris System, an institutional study.
    Danakas A; Sweeney M; Cheris S; Agrawal T
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):56-63. PubMed ID: 33132054
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An institutional experience with The Paris System: A paradigm shift from ambiguous terminology to more objective criteria for reporting urine cytology.
    Roy M; Kaushal S; Jain D; Seth A; Iyer VK; Mathur SR
    Cytopathology; 2017 Dec; 28(6):509-515. PubMed ID: 28833848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Paris System for reporting urinary cytology in daily practice with emphasis on ancillary testing by multiprobe FISH.
    Vlajnic T; Gut A; Savic S; Bubendorf L
    J Clin Pathol; 2020 Feb; 73(2):90-95. PubMed ID: 31467041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Atypical Category of the Johns Hopkins Template Has Higher Risk of Malignancy than the Paris System but the Paris System Is More Applicable for Suspicious Category.
    Celik B; Kavas G
    Acta Cytol; 2023; 67(4):425-433. PubMed ID: 36731438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Digital image analysis supports a nuclear-to-cytoplasmic ratio cutoff value below 0.7 for positive for high-grade urothelial carcinoma and suspicious for high-grade urothelial carcinoma in urine cytology specimens.
    McIntire PJ; Snow JT; Elsoukkary SS; Soong L; Sweeney J; Robinson BD; Siddiqui MT
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Feb; 127(2):120-124. PubMed ID: 30395388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Two-year study on the application of the Paris system for urinary cytology in a cancer centre.
    de Paula R; Oliveira A; Nunes W; Bovolim G; Domingos T; De Brot L; Bezerra S; Cunha I; Morini M; Saieg M
    Cytopathology; 2020 Jan; 31(1):41-46. PubMed ID: 31654587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cytohistological correlation of urine cytology in a tertiary centre with application of the Paris system.
    Rohilla M; Singh P; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Srinivasan R; Dey P; Kakkar N
    Cytopathology; 2018 Oct; 29(5):436-443. PubMed ID: 29920811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Paris System for urine cytology in upper tract urothelial specimens: A comparative analysis with biopsy and surgical resection.
    Zheng X; Si Q; Du D; Harshan M; Zhang Z; Haines K; Shi W; Chhieng DC
    Cytopathology; 2018 Apr; 29(2):184-188. PubMed ID: 29251368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of urine cytology diagnostic reports before and after the implementation of the Paris System classification system in China.
    Ma C; Zhang L
    Cytopathology; 2020 Sep; 31(5):457-462. PubMed ID: 32246545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impact of Implementing the Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology in the Performance of Urine Cytology:  A Correlative Study of 124 Cases.
    Hassan M; Solanki S; Kassouf W; Kanber Y; Caglar D; Auger M; Brimo F
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2016 Sep; 146(3):384-90. PubMed ID: 27543983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The Paris System "atypical urothelial cells" category: can the current criteria be improved?
    Vosoughi A; Ordobazari A; Lora Gonzalez MA; Guido LP; Skiba M; Campuzano-Zuluaga G; Kryvenko ON; Gomez-Fernandez C; Garcia-Buitrago M; Jorda M
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):3-8. PubMed ID: 32732113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of an artificial intelligence algorithm for reporting urine cytopathology.
    Sanghvi AB; Allen EZ; Callenberg KM; Pantanowitz L
    Cancer Cytopathol; 2019 Oct; 127(10):658-666. PubMed ID: 31412169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new 7-point method facilitates accurate diagnosis of high-grade urothelial carcinoma in routine urinary cytology practice.
    Iwai S; Mimura A; Ohtani H; Shimokama T; Kinjo M
    J Am Soc Cytopathol; 2021; 10(1):103-109. PubMed ID: 33092994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cytologic evaluation of upper urinary tract specimens: An institutional retrospective study using The Paris System for Reporting Urine Cytology second edition with histopathologic follow-up.
    Khajir G; Sun T; Wang H; Sprenkle PC; Adeniran AJ; Cai G; Levi AW
    Cytopathology; 2024 Mar; 35(2):235-241. PubMed ID: 37916579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The clinical significance of class III (suspicious) urine cytology.
    Sternberg I; Rona R; Olsfanger S; Lew S; Leibovitch I
    Cytopathology; 2011 Oct; 22(5):329-33. PubMed ID: 21114557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The application of the Johns Hopkins Hospital Template on urine cytology.
    Wu HH; Redelman M; Chen S; Grignon DJ; Cramer HM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2015 Aug; 43(8):593-7. PubMed ID: 25721938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Applying the Paris system for reporting urine cytology to challenging cytology cases.
    Glass R; Rosca O; Raab S; Szabelska J; Chau K; Sheikh-Fayyaz S; Cocker R
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2019 Jul; 47(7):675-681. PubMed ID: 31017746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.