These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

330 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33022936)

  • 41. Driving mechanism of subjective cognition on farmers' adoption behavior of straw returning technology: Evidence from rice and wheat producing provinces in China.
    Ren Z; Zhong K
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():922889. PubMed ID: 35983208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Nexus between Climate-Smart Livestock Production Practices and Farmers' Nutritional Security in Pakistan: Exploring Level, Linkages, and Determinants.
    Shahbaz P; Abbas A; Aziz B; Alotaibi BA; Traore A
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Rural small scale farmers' smart mobile phone usage acceptance prognosticators for agricultural marketing information access.
    Nyagadza B; Mazuruse G; Rukasha T; Mukarumbwa P; Muswaka C; Shumbanhete B
    SN Soc Sci; 2022; 2(12):256. PubMed ID: 36465092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Determinants of Breeding Farmers' Safe Use of Veterinary Drugs: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis.
    Wang J; Yang C; Diao H
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2018 Oct; 15(10):. PubMed ID: 30301236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The role of peer influence and norms in organic farming adoption: Accounting for farmers' heterogeneity.
    Tran-Nam Q; Tiet T
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115909. PubMed ID: 35963067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Smart Products in Livestock Farming-An Empirical Study on the Attitudes of German Farmers.
    Schukat S; Heise H
    Animals (Basel); 2021 Apr; 11(4):. PubMed ID: 33917993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. How Capital Endowment and Ecological Cognition Affect Environment-Friendly Technology Adoption: A Case of Apple Farmers of Shandong Province, China.
    Wang H; Wang X; Sarkar A; Zhang F
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jul; 18(14):. PubMed ID: 34300022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Farmers' technology preference and influencing factors for pesticide reduction: evidence from Hubei Province, China.
    Liu D; Huang Y; Luo X
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Jan; 30(3):6424-6434. PubMed ID: 35996052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Climate change adaptation impact on cash crop productivity and income in Punjab province of Pakistan.
    Ahmad D; Afzal M
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2020 Aug; 27(24):30767-30777. PubMed ID: 32474785
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effect of Farmers' Awareness of Climate Change on Their Willingness to Adopt Low-Carbon Production: Based on the TAM-SOR Model.
    Ling J; Xue Y; Yang C; Zhang Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 20(1):. PubMed ID: 36612940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Risk Attitude, Contract Arrangements and Enforcement in Food Safety Governance: A China's Agri-Food Supply Chain Scenario.
    Hou J; Wu L; Hou B
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Apr; 17(8):. PubMed ID: 32326619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Exploring Farmers' Climate Change Perceptions and Adaptation Intentions: Empirical Evidence from Austria.
    Mitter H; Larcher M; Schönhart M; Stöttinger M; Schmid E
    Environ Manage; 2019 Jun; 63(6):804-821. PubMed ID: 30989322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A review and some reflections on farmers' adoption of sustainable agricultural practices worldwide.
    Foguesatto CR; Borges JAR; Machado JAD
    Sci Total Environ; 2020 Aug; 729():138831. PubMed ID: 32387770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Adoption of Sustainable Agriculture Practices in Banana Farm Production: A Study from the Sindh Region of Pakistan.
    Waseem R; Mwalupaso GE; Waseem F; Khan H; Panhwar GM; Shi Y
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 May; 17(10):. PubMed ID: 32466128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Tanzanian farmers' knowledge and attitudes to GM biotechnology and the potential use of GM crops to provide improved levels of food security. A Qualitative Study.
    Lewis CP; Newell JN; Herron CM; Nawabu H
    BMC Public Health; 2010 Jul; 10():407. PubMed ID: 20624286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Potential impact of groundnut production technology on welfare of smallholder farmers in Ghana.
    Kotu BH; Nurudeen AR; Muthoni F; Hoeschle-Zeledon I; Kizito F
    PLoS One; 2022; 17(1):e0260877. PubMed ID: 35030173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. The Impact of Climate-Smart Agriculture Technology on Productivity: Does Row Planting Matter? Evidence from Southern Ethiopia.
    Mossie WA
    ScientificWorldJournal; 2022; 2022():3218287. PubMed ID: 35991088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Evaluating adoption of climate smart agricultural practices among farmers in the Fujian Province, China.
    Sattar RS; Mehmood MS; Raza MH; Wijeratne VPIS; Shahbaz B
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2023 Mar; 30(15):45331-45341. PubMed ID: 36702985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Willingness to pay for adopting conservation tillage technologies in wheat cultivation: policy options for small-scale farmers.
    Nazu SB; Saha SM; Hossain ME; Haque S; Khan MA
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Sep; 29(42):63458-63471. PubMed ID: 35460006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Socio-economic characteristics influencing farmers' willingness-to-adopt domestic biogas technology in rural Pakistan.
    Jan I
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2021 Apr; 28(16):20690-20699. PubMed ID: 33405169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 17.