These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33023565)

  • 1. Defining and tracking medical student self-monitoring using multiple-choice question item certainty.
    Tweed M; Purdie G; Wilkinson T
    BMC Med Educ; 2020 Oct; 20(1):344. PubMed ID: 33023565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Certainty and safe consequence responses provide additional information from multiple choice question assessments.
    Tweed MJ; Stein S; Wilkinson TJ; Purdie G; Smith J
    BMC Med Educ; 2017 Jun; 17(1):106. PubMed ID: 28659125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using MCQ response certainty to determine how aspects of self-monitoring develop through a medical course.
    Tweed M; Willink R; Wilkinson TJ
    Med Educ; 2024 May; 58(5):535-543. PubMed ID: 37932950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Certainty rating in pre-and post-tests of study modules in an online clinical pharmacy course - A pilot study to evaluate teaching and learning.
    Luetsch K; Burrows J
    BMC Med Educ; 2016 Oct; 16(1):267. PubMed ID: 27741945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Considering evidence for ethnicity bias using assessment case scenarios and medical student correctness and certainty.
    Tweed M; Purdie G; Lacey C
    N Z Med J; 2019 Mar; 132(1491):71-77. PubMed ID: 30845130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Usable knowledge, hazardous ignorance - beyond the percentage correct score.
    Dory V; Degryse J; Roex A; Vanpee D
    Med Teach; 2010; 32(5):375-80. PubMed ID: 20423255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Low performing students have insightfulness when they reflect-in-action.
    Tweed M; Purdie G; Wilkinson T
    Med Educ; 2017 Mar; 51(3):316-323. PubMed ID: 28084033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A novel student-led approach to multiple-choice question generation and online database creation, with targeted clinician input.
    Harris BH; Walsh JL; Tayyaba S; Harris DA; Wilson DJ; Smith PE
    Teach Learn Med; 2015; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 25893940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Medical students create multiple-choice questions for learning in pathology education: a pilot study.
    Grainger R; Dai W; Osborne E; Kenwright D
    BMC Med Educ; 2018 Aug; 18(1):201. PubMed ID: 30134898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Certainty-based marking in a formative assessment improves student course appreciation but not summative examination scores.
    Hendriks WJAJ; Bakker N; Pluk H; de Brouwer A; Wieringa B; Cambi A; Zegers M; Wansink DG; Leunissen R; Klaren PHM
    BMC Med Educ; 2019 May; 19(1):178. PubMed ID: 31151456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. MCQ tests in Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS©): Development and revision.
    Bustraan J; Henny W; Kortbeek JB; Brasel KJ; Hofmann M; Schipper IB
    Injury; 2016 Mar; 47(3):665-8. PubMed ID: 26686592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Self-monitoring and its relationship to medical knowledge.
    McConnell MM; Regehr G; Wood TJ; Eva KW
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Aug; 17(3):311-23. PubMed ID: 21607743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Development of a competency-based formative progress test with student-generated MCQs: Results from a multi-centre pilot study.
    Wagener S; Möltner A; Tımbıl S; Gornostayeva M; Schultz JH; Brüstle P; Mohr D; Vander Beken A; Better J; Fries M; Gottschalk M; Günther J; Herrmann L; Kreisel C; Moczko T; Illg C; Jassowicz A; Müller A; Niesert M; Strübing F; Jünger J
    GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(4):Doc46. PubMed ID: 26483859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Certainty-Based Marking on Multiple-Choice Items: Psychometrics Meets Decision Theory.
    Wu Q; Vanerum M; Agten A; Christiansen A; Vandenabeele F; Rigo JM; Janssen R
    Psychometrika; 2021 Jun; 86(2):518-543. PubMed ID: 33928520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Self-monitoring accuracy does not increase throughout undergraduate medical education.
    Kämmer JE; Hautz WE; März M
    Med Educ; 2020 Apr; 54(4):320-327. PubMed ID: 32119153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of the problem based learning-driven with the traditional didactic-lecture-based curricula.
    Zahid MA; Varghese R; Mohammed AM; Ayed AK
    Int J Med Educ; 2016 Jun; 7():181-7. PubMed ID: 27289331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Small group learning: effect on item analysis and accuracy of self-assessment of medical students.
    Biswas SS; Jain V; Agrawal V; Bindra M
    Educ Health (Abingdon); 2015; 28(1):16-21. PubMed ID: 26261109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The Effect of English Language on Multiple Choice Question Scores of Thai Medical Students.
    Phisalprapa P; Muangkaew W; Assanasen J; Kunavisarut T; Thongngarm T; Ruchutrakool T; Kobwanthanakun S; Dejsomritrutai W
    J Med Assoc Thai; 2016 Apr; 99(4):446-52. PubMed ID: 27396231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effectiveness of internet-based e-learning on clinician behavior and patient outcomes: a systematic review protocol.
    Sinclair P; Kable A; Levett-Jones T
    JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep; 2015 Jan; 13(1):52-64. PubMed ID: 26447007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A pilot survey of student perceptions on the benefit of the OSCE and MCQ modalities.
    Müller S; Settmacher U; Koch I; Dahmen U
    GMS J Med Educ; 2018; 35(4):Doc51. PubMed ID: 30539076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.