These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

239 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33023923)

  • 21. Fixating the eyes of a speaker provides sufficient visual information to modulate early auditory processing.
    Kaplan E; Jesse A
    Biol Psychol; 2019 Sep; 146():107724. PubMed ID: 31323242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Visual Stimuli Modulate Local Field Potentials But Drive No High-Frequency Activity in Human Auditory Cortex.
    Ahveninen J; Lee HJ; Yu HY; Lee CC; Chou CC; Ahlfors SP; Kuo WJ; Jääskeläinen IP; Lin FH
    J Neurosci; 2024 Feb; 44(7):. PubMed ID: 38129133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Visual enhancement of the information representation in auditory cortex.
    Kayser C; Logothetis NK; Panzeri S
    Curr Biol; 2010 Jan; 20(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 20036538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Inattentional Deafness: Visual Load Leads to Time-Specific Suppression of Auditory Evoked Responses.
    Molloy K; Griffiths TD; Chait M; Lavie N
    J Neurosci; 2015 Dec; 35(49):16046-54. PubMed ID: 26658858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does dynamic information about the speaker's face contribute to semantic speech processing? ERP evidence.
    Hernández-Gutiérrez D; Abdel Rahman R; Martín-Loeches M; Muñoz F; Schacht A; Sommer W
    Cortex; 2018 Jul; 104():12-25. PubMed ID: 29715582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Inverse effectiveness and multisensory interactions in visual event-related potentials with audiovisual speech.
    Stevenson RA; Bushmakin M; Kim S; Wallace MT; Puce A; James TW
    Brain Topogr; 2012 Jul; 25(3):308-26. PubMed ID: 22367585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Speech-evoked activation in adult temporal cortex measured using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS): Are the measurements reliable?
    Wiggins IM; Anderson CA; Kitterick PT; Hartley DE
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():142-54. PubMed ID: 27451015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of when, what and how predictions on auditory speech perception.
    Pinto S; Tremblay P; Basirat A; Sato M
    Exp Brain Res; 2019 Dec; 237(12):3143-3153. PubMed ID: 31576421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Dynamics of infant cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) for tone and speech tokens.
    Cone B; Whitaker R
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Jul; 77(7):1162-73. PubMed ID: 23722003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Do congruent lip movements facilitate speech processing in a dynamic audiovisual multi-talker scenario? An ERP study with older and younger adults.
    Begau A; Klatt LI; Wascher E; Schneider D; Getzmann S
    Behav Brain Res; 2021 Aug; 412():113436. PubMed ID: 34175355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Electrocorticography reveals continuous auditory and visual speech tracking in temporal and occipital cortex.
    Micheli C; Schepers IM; Ozker M; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS; Rieger JW
    Eur J Neurosci; 2020 Mar; 51(5):1364-1376. PubMed ID: 29888819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Phase patterns of neuronal responses reliably discriminate speech in human auditory cortex.
    Luo H; Poeppel D
    Neuron; 2007 Jun; 54(6):1001-10. PubMed ID: 17582338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Intracranial mapping of auditory perception: event-related responses and electrocortical stimulation.
    Sinai A; Crone NE; Wied HM; Franaszczuk PJ; Miglioretti D; Boatman-Reich D
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 120(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 19070540
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Responses to Visual Speech in Human Posterior Superior Temporal Gyrus Examined with iEEG Deconvolution.
    Metzger BA; Magnotti JF; Wang Z; Nesbitt E; Karas PJ; Yoshor D; Beauchamp MS
    J Neurosci; 2020 Sep; 40(36):6938-6948. PubMed ID: 32727820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Phase Alignment of Low-Frequency Neural Activity to the Amplitude Envelope of Speech Reflects Evoked Responses to Acoustic Edges, Not Oscillatory Entrainment.
    Oganian Y; Kojima K; Breska A; Cai C; Findlay A; Chang E; Nagarajan SS
    J Neurosci; 2023 May; 43(21):3909-3921. PubMed ID: 37185238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ; Lee HJ; Kang H; Lee DS; Chang SO; Oh SH
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. How do auditory cortex neurons represent communication sounds?
    Gaucher Q; Huetz C; Gourévitch B; Laudanski J; Occelli F; Edeline JM
    Hear Res; 2013 Nov; 305():102-12. PubMed ID: 23603138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Competing influence of visual speech on auditory neural adaptation.
    Sato M
    Brain Lang; 2023 Dec; 247():105359. PubMed ID: 37951157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. The phase of cortical oscillations determines the perceptual fate of visual cues in naturalistic audiovisual speech.
    Thézé R; Giraud AL; Mégevand P
    Sci Adv; 2020 Nov; 6(45):. PubMed ID: 33148648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Speech frequency-following response in human auditory cortex is more than a simple tracking.
    Guo N; Si X; Zhang Y; Ding Y; Zhou W; Zhang D; Hong B
    Neuroimage; 2021 Feb; 226():117545. PubMed ID: 33186711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.