211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33025366)
21. Experts in Minimally Invasive Surgery are Outperformed by Trained Novices on Suturing Skills.
Verhoeven DJ; Joosten M; Leijte E; Mbi Botden S; Verhoeven BH
J Surg Res; 2024 Mar; 295():540-546. PubMed ID: 38086254
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of Deep Learning Models for Identifying Surgical Actions and Measuring Performance.
Khalid S; Goldenberg M; Grantcharov T; Taati B; Rudzicz F
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Mar; 3(3):e201664. PubMed ID: 32227178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Gesture Recognition in Robotic Surgery With Multimodal Attention.
van Amsterdam B; Funke I; Edwards E; Speidel S; Collins J; Sridhar A; Kelly J; Clarkson MJ; Stoyanov D
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2022 Jul; 41(7):1677-1687. PubMed ID: 35108200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Sensor-based machine learning for workflow detection and as key to detect expert level in laparoscopic suturing and knot-tying.
Kowalewski KF; Garrow CR; Schmidt MW; Benner L; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
Surg Endosc; 2019 Nov; 33(11):3732-3740. PubMed ID: 30790048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Video self-assessment of basic suturing and knot tying skills by novice trainees.
Hu Y; Tiemann D; Michael Brunt L
J Surg Educ; 2013; 70(2):279-83. PubMed ID: 23427977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Capturing fine-grained details for video-based automation of suturing skills assessment.
Hung AJ; Bao R; Sunmola IO; Huang DA; Nguyen JH; Anandkumar A
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 Mar; 18(3):545-552. PubMed ID: 36282465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Evaluation of a novel modified suture material designed to facilitate intracorporeal knot tying during laparoscopic surgery.
Tan A; Razvi H
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1104-8. PubMed ID: 16283848
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of perceptual ability and mental imagery training on simulated laparoscopic knot-tying in surgical novices using a Nissen fundoplication model.
Jungmann F; Gockel I; Hecht H; Kuhr K; Räsänen J; Sihvo E; Lang H
Scand J Surg; 2011; 100(2):78-85. PubMed ID: 21737382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Video assessment of laparoscopic skills by novices and experts: implications for surgical education.
Yeung C; Carrillo B; Pope V; Hosseinpour S; Gerstle JT; Azzie G
Surg Endosc; 2017 Oct; 31(10):3883-3889. PubMed ID: 28205036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Automated robot-assisted surgical skill evaluation: Predictive analytics approach.
Fard MJ; Ameri S; Darin Ellis R; Chinnam RB; Pandya AK; Klein MD
Int J Med Robot; 2018 Feb; 14(1):. PubMed ID: 28660725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Surgical gesture classification from video and kinematic data.
Zappella L; Béjar B; Hager G; Vidal R
Med Image Anal; 2013 Oct; 17(7):732-45. PubMed ID: 23706754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Baseline Laparoscopic Skill May Predict Baseline Robotic Skill and Early Robotic Surgery Learning Curve.
McVey R; Goldenberg MG; Bernardini MQ; Yasufuku K; Quereshy FA; Finelli A; Pace KT; Lee JY
J Endourol; 2016 May; 30(5):588-92. PubMed ID: 26915663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Technical Skill Impacts the Success of Sequential Robotic Suturing Substeps.
Sanford DI; Der B; Haque TF; Ma R; Hakim R; Nguyen JH; Cen S; Hung AJ
J Endourol; 2022 Feb; 36(2):273-278. PubMed ID: 34779231
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Deep neural network architecture for automated soft surgical skills evaluation using objective structured assessment of technical skills criteria.
Benmansour M; Malti A; Jannin P
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2023 May; 18(5):929-937. PubMed ID: 36694051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Development and Validation of a Laparoscopic Simulation Model for Suturing the Vaginal Cuff.
King CR; Donnellan N; Guido R; Ecker A; Althouse AD; Mansuria S
Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Oct; 126 Suppl 4():27S-35S. PubMed ID: 26375557
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Video-based skill assessment of endoscopic suturing in a pediatric chest model and a box trainer.
Takazawa S; Ishimaru T; Harada K; Tsukuda Y; Sugita N; Mitsuishi M; Iwanaka T
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2015 May; 25(5):445-53. PubMed ID: 25423170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Effect of Continuous Motion Parameter Feedback on Laparoscopic Simulation Training: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial on Skill Acquisition and Retention.
Buescher JF; Mehdorn AS; Neumann PA; Becker F; Eichelmann AK; Pankratius U; Bahde R; Foell D; Senninger N; Rijcken E
J Surg Educ; 2018; 75(2):516-526. PubMed ID: 28864265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. C-SATS: Assessing Surgical Skills Among Urology Residency Applicants.
Vernez SL; Huynh V; Osann K; Okhunov Z; Landman J; Clayman RV
J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(S1):S95-S100. PubMed ID: 27633332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. SATR-DL: Improving Surgical Skill Assessment And Task Recognition In Robot-Assisted Surgery With Deep Neural Networks.
Wang Z; Fey AM
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2018 Jul; 2018():1793-1796. PubMed ID: 30440742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Towards near real-time assessment of surgical skills: A comparison of feature extraction techniques.
Anh NX; Nataraja RM; Chauhan S
Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Apr; 187():105234. PubMed ID: 31794913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]