324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33025811)
1. Utility of Targeted Ultrasound to Predict Malignancy Among Lesions Detected on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Coffey K; Sung J; Comstock C; Askin G; Jochelson MS; Morris EA; D'Alessio D
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Sep; 217(3):595-604. PubMed ID: 33025811
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Utility of MRI-Directed Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Biopsy Planning for Suspicious MRI-Detected Breast Lesions.
Nida BA; Rooney TB; Miller MM
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Feb; 220(2):202-211. PubMed ID: 36000664
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Directed Ultrasound Imaging of Non-Mass Enhancement in the Breast: Outcomes and Frequency of Malignancy.
Newburg AR; Chhor CM; Young Lin LL; Heller SL; Gillman J; Toth HK; Moy L
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar; 36(3):493-504. PubMed ID: 28108994
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Efficacy of MRI-Directed Breast Ultrasound and Lesion Characteristics Affecting Visualization on Breast Ultrasound.
Xiao L; Simmons C; Khanani S
Curr Probl Diagn Radiol; 2022; 51(5):717-721. PubMed ID: 35272882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Utility of second-look ultrasound in the management of incidental enhancing lesions detected by breast MR imaging.
Carbognin G; Girardi V; Calciolari C; Brandalise A; Bonetti F; Russo A; Pozzi Mucelli R
Radiol Med; 2010 Dec; 115(8):1234-45. PubMed ID: 20574702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Short-term follow-up of contrast-enhanced mammography lesions after negative breast MRI in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
Coffey K; Dixon LB; Sevilimedu V; Jochelson MS; Sung JS
Eur J Radiol; 2023 Nov; 168():111097. PubMed ID: 37738835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Enhancement Type at Contrast-enhanced Mammography and Association with Malignancy.
Kim G; Mehta TS; Brook A; Du LH; Legare K; Phillips J
Radiology; 2022 Nov; 305(2):299-306. PubMed ID: 35819328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided biopsy of suspicious breast lesions on contrast-enhanced mammography and contrast-enhanced MRI: a case series.
Huang PY; Tsai MY; Huang JS; Lin PY; Chou CP
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2023 Oct; 50(4):521-529. PubMed ID: 37493921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Contrast-enhanced mammography-guided biopsy: technical feasibility and first outcomes.
Alcantara R; Posso M; Pitarch M; Arenas N; Ejarque B; Iotti V; Besutti G
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):417-428. PubMed ID: 35895121
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Breast masses with rim enhancement on contrast-enhanced mammography: morphological and enhancement features for diagnosis and differentiation of benign and malignant.
Wen C; Wang S; Ma M; Xu Z; Zeng F; Zeng H; Liao X; He Z; Xu W; Chen W
Br J Radiol; 2024 May; 97(1157):1016-1021. PubMed ID: 38521539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of False-Positive Versus True-Positive Findings on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
Amir T; Hogan MP; Jacobs S; Sevilimedu V; Sung J; Jochelson MS
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):797-808. PubMed ID: 34817195
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. The PROCEM study protocol: Added value of preoperative contrast-enhanced mammography in staging of malignant breast lesions - a prospective randomized multicenter study.
Åhsberg K; Gardfjell A; Nimeus E; Ryden L; Zackrisson S
BMC Cancer; 2021 Oct; 21(1):1115. PubMed ID: 34663236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced mammography versus the combination of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.
Girometti R; Linda A; Conte P; Lorenzon M; De Serio I; Jerman K; Londero V; Zuiani C
Radiol Med; 2021 Nov; 126(11):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 34302599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diagnostic accuracy of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in breast cancer detection in comparison to tomosynthesis, synthetic 2D mammography and tomosynthesis combined with ultrasound in women with dense breast.
Sudhir R; Sannapareddy K; Potlapalli A; Krishnamurthy PB; Buddha S; Koppula V
Br J Radiol; 2021 Feb; 94(1118):20201046. PubMed ID: 33242249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis for Upgraded BIRADS Scoring towards the True Pathology of Lesions Detected by Contrast-Enhanced Mammography.
Grubstein A; Friehmann T; Dahan M; Abitbol C; Gadiel I; Schejtman DM; Shochat T; Atar E; Tamir S
Tomography; 2024 May; 10(5):806-815. PubMed ID: 38787021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Contrast-Enhanced Mammography for Women with Palpable Breast Abnormalities.
Amir T; Pinker K; Sevilimedu V; Hughes M; Keating DT; Sung JS; Jochelson MS
Acad Radiol; 2024 Apr; 31(4):1231-1238. PubMed ID: 37949703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. MRI only detected lesions: Can contrast enhanced mammography guided biopsy be an alternative method: Initial clinical findings.
Aribal E; Guldogan N; Seker ME; Yilmaz E; Turk EB
Eur J Radiol; 2024 Apr; 173():111373. PubMed ID: 38364588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Contrast Enhanced Mammography in Routine Clinical Practice: Frequency and Malignancy Rates of Enhancing Otherwise Occult Findings.
Viggiano T; Scott R; Sharpe R; Kasper C; Mazza G; Pizzitola V; Giurescu M; Lorans R; Eversman W; Patel BK
Clin Breast Cancer; 2022 Oct; 22(7):e736-e744. PubMed ID: 35977855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Digital breast Tomosynthesis vacuum assisted biopsy for Tomosynthesis-detected Sonographically occult lesions.
Ariaratnam NS; Little ST; Whitley MA; Ferguson K
Clin Imaging; 2018; 47():4-8. PubMed ID: 28806573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Characterization of breast lesions: comparison of digital breast tomosynthesis and ultrasonography.
Kim SA; Chang JM; Cho N; Yi A; Moon WK
Korean J Radiol; 2015; 16(2):229-38. PubMed ID: 25741187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
