336 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33025930)
1. Microtensile Bond Strength of Bulk-fill Resin Composite Restorations in High C-factor Cavities.
de Oliveira ILM; de Brito OFF; de Melo Monteiro LMCGQ; Resende Montes MAJ
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Jun; 21(6):626-631. PubMed ID: 33025930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Low- and high-viscosity bulk-fill resin composites: a comparison of microhardness, microtensile bond strength, and fracture strength in restored molars.
França FM; Tenuti JG; Broglio IP; Paiva LE; Basting RT; Turssi CP; do Amaral FL; Reis AF; Vieira-Junior WF
Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2021 Aug; 34(2):173-182. PubMed ID: 34570866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Flowable fiber-reinforced versus flowable bulk-fill resin composites: Degree of conversion and microtensile bond strength to dentin in high C-factor cavities.
Harp YS; Montaser MA; Zaghloul NM
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2022 Jun; 34(4):699-706. PubMed ID: 35274436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The Effects of Cavity Preparation and Composite Resin on Bond Strength and Stress Distribution Using the Microtensile Bond Test.
Braga S; Oliveira L; Rodrigues RB; Bicalho AA; Novais VR; Armstrong S; Soares CJ
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(1):81-89. PubMed ID: 28976839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Microtensile bond strength of bulk-fill restorative composites to dentin.
Mandava J; Vegesna DP; Ravi R; Boddeda MR; Uppalapati LV; Ghazanfaruddin MD
J Clin Exp Dent; 2017 Aug; 9(8):e1023-e1028. PubMed ID: 28936294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Gingival microleakage of class II bulk-fill composite resin restorations.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Nabih S; Saleh B
Dent Med Probl; 2018; 55(4):383-388. PubMed ID: 30648363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Dentin adhesion of bulk-fill composites and universal adhesives in class I-cavities with high C-factor.
Eichler E; Vach K; Schlueter N; Jacker-Guhr S; Luehrs AK
J Dent; 2024 Mar; 142():104852. PubMed ID: 38244909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Effect of C-factor on Micro-tensile Bond Strength of Bulk fill V/S Micro-hybrid Composite in Class II Restorations - An In-Vitro Study.
Yadav V; Roongta RN; Yadav S; Talwar S
Niger Med J; 2022; 63(2):112-120. PubMed ID: 38803704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Bond Strength of a Flowable Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Class II MOD Cavities.
Kumagai RY; Zeidan LC; Rodrigues JA; Reis AF; Roulet JF
J Adhes Dent; 2015 Aug; 17(5):427-32. PubMed ID: 26525007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cuspal Deflection of Premolars Restored with Bulk-Fill Composite Resins.
Behery H; El-Mowafy O; El-Badrawy W; Saleh B; Nabih S
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2016; 28(2):122-30. PubMed ID: 26892364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Microleakage in class II restorations of two bulk fill resin composites and a conventional nanohybrid resin composite: an in vitro study at 10,000 thermocycles.
Cayo-Rojas CF; Hernández-Caba KK; Aliaga-Mariñas AS; Ladera-Castañeda MI; Cervantes-Ganoza LA
BMC Oral Health; 2021 Dec; 21(1):619. PubMed ID: 34861859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fracture Resistance of Endodontically Treated Teeth Restored With Bulk Fill, Bulk Fill Flowable, Fiber-reinforced, and Conventional Resin Composite.
Atalay C; Yazici AR; Horuztepe A; Nagas E; Ertan A; Ozgunaltay G
Oper Dent; 2016; 41(5):E131-E140. PubMed ID: 27352045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of different placement techniques on the microtensile bond strength of low-shrink silorane composite bonded to Class I cavities.
Almeida e Silva JS; Rolla JN; Baratieri LN; Monteiro S
Gen Dent; 2011; 59(6):e233-7. PubMed ID: 22313929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Color stability of bulk-fill and universal composite restorations with dissimilar dentin replacement materials.
Miletic V; Marjanovic J; Veljovic DN; Stasic JN; Petrovic V
J Esthet Restor Dent; 2019 Sep; 31(5):520-528. PubMed ID: 31580013
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An in-vitro assessment of the shear bond strength of bulk-fill resin composites to permanent and deciduous teeth.
Ilie N; Schöner C; Bücher K; Hickel R
J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):850-5. PubMed ID: 24704081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Fracture Load of Molars Restored with Bulk-fill, Flowable Bulk-fill, and Conventional Resin Composite After Simulated Chewing.
Guerra L; Ramos RQ; Linhares LA; Bernardon JK; Favero SS; César PF; Júnior SM
Oper Dent; 2023 May; 48(3):294-303. PubMed ID: 36656317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterization and Comparative Analysis of Voids in Class II Composite Resin Restorations by Optical Coherence Tomography.
Pardo Díaz CA; Shimokawa C; Sampaio CS; Freitas AZ; Turbino ML
Oper Dent; 2020; 45(1):71-79. PubMed ID: 31226004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Incremental and Bulk-fill Techniques With Bulk-fill Resin Composite in Different Cavity Configurations.
Han SH; Park SH
Oper Dent; 2018; 43(6):631-641. PubMed ID: 29630486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Microleakage and shear punch bond strength in class II primary molars cavities restored with low shrink silorane based versus methacrylate based composite using three different techniques.
Fahmy AE; Farrag NM
J Clin Pediatr Dent; 2010; 35(2):173-81. PubMed ID: 21417120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
