BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33026906)

  • 1. Bimanual but not unimanual finger movements are triggered by a startling acoustic stimulus: evidence for increased reticulospinal drive for bimanual responses.
    Maslovat D; Teku F; Smith V; Drummond NM; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2020 Dec; 124(6):1832-1838. PubMed ID: 33026906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Startle-triggered responses indicate reticulospinal drive is larger for voluntary shoulder versus finger movements.
    Maslovat D; Santangelo CM; Carlsen AN
    Sci Rep; 2023 Apr; 13(1):6532. PubMed ID: 37085607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. StartReact effects are dependent on engagement of startle reflex circuits: support for a subcortically mediated initiation pathway.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 Dec; 122(6):2541-2547. PubMed ID: 31642402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. High-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals differential cortical contributions to prepared responses.
    Smith V; Maslovat D; Drummond NM; Hajj J; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2019 May; 121(5):1809-1821. PubMed ID: 30864866
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A TMS-induced cortical silent period delays the contralateral limb for bimanual symmetrical movements and the reaction time delay is reduced on startle trials.
    Teku F; Maslovat D; Carlsen AN
    J Neurophysiol; 2022 May; 127(5):1298-1308. PubMed ID: 35417257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Existence of the StartReact Effect Implies Reticulospinal, Not Corticospinal, Inputs Dominate Drive to Motoneurons during Voluntary Movement.
    Tapia JA; Tohyama T; Poll A; Baker SN
    J Neurosci; 2022 Oct; 42(40):7634-7647. PubMed ID: 36658461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Foreknowledge of an impending startling stimulus does not affect the proportion of startle reflexes or latency of StartReact responses.
    Drummond NM; Leguerrier A; Carlsen AN
    Exp Brain Res; 2017 Feb; 235(2):379-388. PubMed ID: 27738717
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Neural coordination of bilateral hand movements: evidence for an involvement of brainstem motor centres.
    Dietz V; Holliger NS; Christen A; Geissmann M; Filli L
    J Physiol; 2024 Jan; 602(2):397-412. PubMed ID: 38178603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence for reticulospinal contributions to coordinated finger movements in humans.
    Honeycutt CF; Kharouta M; Perreault EJ
    J Neurophysiol; 2013 Oct; 110(7):1476-83. PubMed ID: 23825395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reticulospinal Contributions to Gross Hand Function after Human Spinal Cord Injury.
    Baker SN; Perez MA
    J Neurosci; 2017 Oct; 37(40):9778-9784. PubMed ID: 28871033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Neural gain induced by startling acoustic stimuli is additive to preparatory activation.
    McInnes AN; Corti EJ; Tresilian JR; Lipp OV; Marinovic W
    Psychophysiology; 2020 Mar; 57(3):e13493. PubMed ID: 31595983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Fractionation of muscle activity in rapid responses to startling cues.
    Dean LR; Baker SN
    J Neurophysiol; 2017 Apr; 117(4):1713-1719. PubMed ID: 28003416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. StartReact during gait initiation reveals differential control of muscle activation and inhibition in patients with corticospinal degeneration.
    van Lith BJH; Coppens MJM; Nonnekes J; van de Warrenburg BPC; Geurts AC; Weerdesteyn V
    J Neurol; 2018 Nov; 265(11):2531-2539. PubMed ID: 30155740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Unified nature of bimanual movements revealed by separating the preparation of each arm.
    Blinch J; Franks IM; Carpenter MG; Chua R
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jun; 233(6):1931-44. PubMed ID: 25850406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Does the StartReact Effect Apply to First-Trial Reactive Movements?
    Sutter K; Nonnekes J; Dibilio V; Geurts AC; Weerdesteyn V
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(4):e0153129. PubMed ID: 27077654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cortical involvement in the StartReact effect.
    Stevenson AJ; Chiu C; Maslovat D; Chua R; Gick B; Blouin JS; Franks IM
    Neuroscience; 2014 Jun; 269():21-34. PubMed ID: 24680855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Response triggering by an acoustic stimulus increases with stimulus intensity and is best predicted by startle reflex activation.
    Maslovat D; Sadler CM; Smith V; Bui A; Carlsen AN
    Sci Rep; 2021 Dec; 11(1):23612. PubMed ID: 34880317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Excitability of the pathways mediating the startle reaction before execution of a voluntary movement.
    Kumru H; Valls-Solé J
    Exp Brain Res; 2006 Mar; 169(3):427-32. PubMed ID: 16273394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. StartReact restores reaction time in HSP: evidence for subcortical release of a motor program.
    Nonnekes J; Oude Nijhuis LB; de Niet M; de Bot ST; Pasman JW; van de Warrenburg BP; Bloem BR; Weerdesteyn V; Geurts AC
    J Neurosci; 2014 Jan; 34(1):275-81. PubMed ID: 24381288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Differential effects of startle on reaction time for finger and arm movements.
    Carlsen AN; Chua R; Inglis JT; Sanderson DJ; Franks IM
    J Neurophysiol; 2009 Jan; 101(1):306-14. PubMed ID: 19005006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.