These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

294 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33027198)

  • 1. The Cost of Intrinsic and Extrinsic Cognitive Demands on Auditory Functioning in Older Adults With Normal Hearing or Using Hearing Aids.
    Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2021; 42(3):615-628. PubMed ID: 33027198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. AVATAR Assesses Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs in Ecologically Relevant Listening Situations.
    Devesse A; van Wieringen A; Wouters J
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(3):521-531. PubMed ID: 31356387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Age Affects Speech Understanding and Multitask Costs.
    Devesse A; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1412-1415. PubMed ID: 31977724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Speech Perception in Noise and Listening Effort of Older Adults With Nonlinear Frequency Compression Hearing Aids.
    Shehorn J; Marrone N; Muller T
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(2):215-225. PubMed ID: 28806193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Listening Effort Measured Using a Dual-task Paradigm in Adults With Different Amounts of Noise Exposure.
    Degeest S; Kestens K; Keppler H
    Ear Hear; 2022; 43(3):899-912. PubMed ID: 34619684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Auditory, Visual, and Cognitive Abilities in Normal-Hearing Adults, Hearing Aid Users, and Cochlear Implant Users.
    Ceuleers D; Keppler H; Degeest S; Baudonck N; Swinnen F; Kestens K; Dhooge I
    Ear Hear; 2024 May-Jun 01; 45(3):679-694. PubMed ID: 38192017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. How hearing aids, background noise, and visual cues influence objective listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA; Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):e52-64. PubMed ID: 23416751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Effects of Hearing Aid Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction Processing on Listening Effort in Older Adults with Hearing Loss.
    Desjardins JL
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Jan; 27(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 26809324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of age, hearing, and working memory on the speech comprehension benefit derived from an automatic speech recognition system.
    Zekveld AA; Kramer SE; Kessens JM; Vlaming MS; Houtgast T
    Ear Hear; 2009 Apr; 30(2):262-72. PubMed ID: 19194286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of changing the secondary task in dual-task paradigms for measuring listening effort.
    Picou EM; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):611-22. PubMed ID: 24992491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effects of hearing aid use on listening effort and mental fatigue associated with sustained speech processing demands.
    Hornsby BW
    Ear Hear; 2013 Sep; 34(5):523-34. PubMed ID: 23426091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dual-Task Interference in the Assessment of Listening Effort: Results of Normal-Hearing Adults, Cochlear Implant Users, and Hearing Aid Users.
    Ceuleers D; Degeest S; Swinnen F; Baudonck N; Kestens K; Dhooge I; Keppler H
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2024 Sep; 67(9):3201-3216. PubMed ID: 39106210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age-related changes in listening effort for various types of masker noises.
    Desjardins JL; Doherty KA
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(3):261-72. PubMed ID: 23095723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effects of directional sound processing and listener's motivation on EEG responses to continuous noisy speech: Do normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners differ?
    Mirkovic B; Debener S; Schmidt J; Jaeger M; Neher T
    Hear Res; 2019 Jun; 377():260-270. PubMed ID: 31003037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Potential benefits and limitations of three types of directional processing in hearing aids.
    Picou EM; Aspell E; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(3):339-52. PubMed ID: 24518429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Measuring listening effort: driving simulator versus simple dual-task paradigm.
    Wu YH; Aksan N; Rizzo M; Stangl E; Zhang X; Bentler R
    Ear Hear; 2014; 35(6):623-32. PubMed ID: 25083599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Predictive Sentence Context Reduces Listening Effort in Older Adults With and Without Hearing Loss and With High and Low Working Memory Capacity.
    Hunter CR; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2022 Jul-Aug 01; 43(4):1164-1177. PubMed ID: 34983897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Text as a Supplement to Speech in Young and Older Adults.
    Krull V; Humes LE
    Ear Hear; 2016; 37(2):164-76. PubMed ID: 26458131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Listening Effort Measured in Adults with Normal Hearing and Cochlear Implants.
    Perreau AE; Wu YH; Tatge B; Irwin D; Corts D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):685-697. PubMed ID: 28906240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Behavioral Measures of Listening Effort in School-Age Children: Examining the Effects of Signal-to-Noise Ratio, Hearing Loss, and Amplification.
    McGarrigle R; Gustafson SJ; Hornsby BWY; Bess FH
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(2):381-392. PubMed ID: 29905670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.