243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33027562)
1. Understanding the Basics of Meta-Analysis and How to Read a Forest Plot: As Simple as It Gets.
Andrade C
J Clin Psychiatry; 2020 Oct; 81(5):. PubMed ID: 33027562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: detecting and dealing with heterogeneity in meta-analyses.
Cordero CP; Dans AL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2021 Feb; 130():149-151. PubMed ID: 33483004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A guide to interpreting systematic reviews and meta-analyses in neurosurgery and surgery.
Esene I; Tantengco OAG; Robertson FC; Still MEH; Ukachukwu AK; Baticulon RE; Barthélemy EJ; Perez-Chadid D; Lippa L; Silva ACV; Jokonya L; Hassani FD; Nicolosi F; Takoutsing BD; Ntalaja J; Hoz SS; Kalangu KKN; Dechambenoit G; Servadei F; El Abbadi N; Park KB; Kolias A
Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2024 Jun; 166(1):250. PubMed ID: 38833024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Quantitative synthesis in systematic reviews.
Lau J; Ioannidis JP; Schmid CH
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Nov; 127(9):820-6. PubMed ID: 9382404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. More than numbers: the power of graphs in meta-analysis.
Bax L; Ikeda N; Fukui N; Yaju Y; Tsuruta H; Moons KG
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 169(2):249-55. PubMed ID: 19064649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Practical considerations on detection of publication bias].
Palma Pérez S; Delgado Rodríguez M
Gac Sanit; 2006 Dec; 20 Suppl 3():10-6. PubMed ID: 17433196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. How to review and assess a systematic review and meta-analysis article: a methodological study (secondary publication).
Myung SK
J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2023; 20():24. PubMed ID: 37619974
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Response to letter to the editor from Dr Rahman Shiri: The challenging topic of suicide across occupational groups.
Niedhammer I; Milner A; Witt K; Klingelschmidt J; Khireddine-Medouni I; Alexopoulos EC; Toivanen S; Chastang JF; LaMontagne AD
Scand J Work Environ Health; 2018 Jan; 44(1):108-110. PubMed ID: 29218357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Evidence-based practice: how to perform and use systematic reviews for clinical decision-making.
Kranke P
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2010 Sep; 27(9):763-72. PubMed ID: 20523217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Instructions for aggregated evidence: About reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analyses (part 2)].
Günther J; Briel M; Schindler B
Med Monatsschr Pharm; 2015 Oct; 38(10):401-8. PubMed ID: 26731858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. How to read and understand and use systematic reviews and meta-analyses.
Leucht S; Kissling W; Davis JM
Acta Psychiatr Scand; 2009 Jun; 119(6):443-50. PubMed ID: 19469725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. In an empirical evaluation of the funnel plot, researchers could not visually identify publication bias.
Terrin N; Schmid CH; Lau J
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Sep; 58(9):894-901. PubMed ID: 16085192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Misleading funnel plot for detection of bias in meta-analysis.
Tang JL; Liu JL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2000 May; 53(5):477-84. PubMed ID: 10812319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Understanding and evaluating meta-analysis.
Dawson DV; Pihlstrom BL; Blanchette DR
J Am Dent Assoc; 2016 Apr; 147(4):264-70. PubMed ID: 26705602
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple uses of forest plots in presenting analysis results in health research: A Tutorial.
Li G; Zeng J; Tian J; Levine MAH; Thabane L
J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Jan; 117():89-98. PubMed ID: 31589955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Standardized mean differences cause funnel plot distortion in publication bias assessments.
Zwetsloot PP; Van Der Naald M; Sena ES; Howells DW; IntHout J; De Groot JA; Chamuleau SA; MacLeod MR; Wever KE
Elife; 2017 Sep; 6():. PubMed ID: 28884685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Publication Bias and Nonreporting Found in Majority of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses in Anesthesiology Journals.
Hedin RJ; Umberham BA; Detweiler BN; Kollmorgen L; Vassar M
Anesth Analg; 2016 Oct; 123(4):1018-25. PubMed ID: 27537925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A methodological review of how heterogeneity has been examined in systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy.
Dinnes J; Deeks J; Kirby J; Roderick P
Health Technol Assess; 2005 Mar; 9(12):1-113, iii. PubMed ID: 15774235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Presenting simulation results in a nested loop plot.
Rücker G; Schwarzer G
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2014 Dec; 14():129. PubMed ID: 25495636
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
