These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33027834)

  • 21. Applying the OMOP Common Data Model to Facilitate Benefit-Risk Assessments of Medicinal Products Using Real-World Data from Singapore and South Korea.
    Tan HX; Teo DCH; Lee D; Kim C; Neo JW; Sung C; Chahed H; Ang PS; Tan DSY; Park RW; Dorajoo SR
    Healthc Inform Res; 2022 Apr; 28(2):112-122. PubMed ID: 35576979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An Ontology-Based Approach for Consolidating Patient Data Standardized With European Norm/International Organization for Standardization 13606 (EN/ISO 13606) Into Joint Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) Repositories: Description of a Methodology.
    Frid S; Pastor Duran X; Bracons Cucó G; Pedrera-Jiménez M; Serrano-Balazote P; Muñoz Carrero A; Lozano-Rubí R
    JMIR Med Inform; 2023 Mar; 11():e44547. PubMed ID: 36884279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Data Integration into OMOP CDM for Heterogeneous Clinical Data Collections via HL7 FHIR Bundles and XSLT.
    Fischer P; Stöhr MR; Gall H; Michel-Backofen A; Majeed RW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2020 Jun; 270():138-142. PubMed ID: 32570362
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Transforming and evaluating the UK Biobank to the OMOP Common Data Model for COVID-19 research and beyond.
    Papez V; Moinat M; Voss EA; Bazakou S; Van Winzum A; Peviani A; Payralbe S; Kallfelz M; Asselbergs FW; Prieto-Alhambra D; Dobson RJB; Denaxas S
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2022 Dec; 30(1):103-111. PubMed ID: 36227072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Transformation and Evaluation of the MIMIC Database in the OMOP Common Data Model: Development and Usability Study.
    Paris N; Lamer A; Parrot A
    JMIR Med Inform; 2021 Dec; 9(12):e30970. PubMed ID: 34904958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Transforming and evaluating electronic health record disease phenotyping algorithms using the OMOP common data model: a case study in heart failure.
    Papez V; Moinat M; Payralbe S; Asselbergs FW; Lumbers RT; Hemingway H; Dobson R; Denaxas S
    JAMIA Open; 2021 Jul; 4(3):ooab001. PubMed ID: 34514354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. From OpenEHR to FHIR and OMOP Data Model for Microbiology Findings.
    Rinaldi E; Thun S
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2021 May; 281():402-406. PubMed ID: 34042774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fidelity assessment of a clinical practice research datalink conversion to the OMOP common data model.
    Matcho A; Ryan P; Fife D; Reich C
    Drug Saf; 2014 Nov; 37(11):945-59. PubMed ID: 25187016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Transforming Thyroid Cancer Diagnosis and Staging Information from Unstructured Reports to the Observational Medical Outcome Partnership Common Data Model.
    Yoo S; Yoon E; Boo D; Kim B; Kim S; Paeng JC; Yoo IR; Choi IY; Kim K; Ryoo HG; Lee SJ; Song E; Joo YH; Kim J; Lee HY
    Appl Clin Inform; 2022 May; 13(3):521-531. PubMed ID: 35705182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Integrating real-world data to assess cardiac ablation device outcomes in a multicenter study using the OMOP common data model for regulatory decisions: implementation and evaluation.
    Yu Y; Jiang G; Brandt E; Forsyth T; Dhruva SS; Zhang S; Chen J; Noseworthy PA; Doshi AA; Collison-Farr K; Kim D; Ross JS; Coplan PM; Drozda JP
    JAMIA Open; 2023 Apr; 6(1):ooac108. PubMed ID: 36632328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Conversion of National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort (NHIS-NSC) Database into Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership-Common Data Model (OMOP-CDM).
    You SC; Lee S; Cho SY; Park H; Jung S; Cho J; Yoon D; Park RW
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2017; 245():467-470. PubMed ID: 29295138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A Comparative Assessment of Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership and Mini-Sentinel Common Data Models and Analytics: Implications for Active Drug Safety Surveillance.
    Xu Y; Zhou X; Suehs BT; Hartzema AG; Kahn MG; Moride Y; Sauer BC; Liu Q; Moll K; Pasquale MK; Nair VP; Bate A
    Drug Saf; 2015 Aug; 38(8):749-65. PubMed ID: 26055920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Facilitating phenotype transfer using a common data model.
    Hripcsak G; Shang N; Peissig PL; Rasmussen LV; Liu C; Benoit B; Carroll RJ; Carrell DS; Denny JC; Dikilitas O; Gainer VS; Howell KM; Klann JG; Kullo IJ; Lingren T; Mentch FD; Murphy SN; Natarajan K; Pacheco JA; Wei WQ; Wiley K; Weng C
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Aug; 96():103253. PubMed ID: 31325501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Mapping Local Biospecimen Records to the OMOP Common Data Model.
    Michael CL; Sholle ET; Wulff RT; Roboz GJ; Campion TR
    AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc; 2020; 2020():422-429. PubMed ID: 32477663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. ROMOP: a light-weight R package for interfacing with OMOP-formatted electronic health record data.
    Glicksberg BS; Oskotsky B; Giangreco N; Thangaraj PM; Rudrapatna V; Datta D; Frazier R; Lee N; Larsen R; Tatonetti NP; Butte AJ
    JAMIA Open; 2019 Apr; 2(1):10-14. PubMed ID: 31633087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Development and validation of a management system and dataset quality assessment tool for the Radiology Common Data Model (R_CDM): A case study in liver disease.
    Kim TH; Noh S; Kim YR; Lee C; Kim JE; Jeong CW; Yoon KH
    Int J Med Inform; 2022 Apr; 162():104759. PubMed ID: 35390589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Standardizing electronic health record ventilation data in the pediatric long-term mechanical ventilator-dependent population.
    Kanbar LJ; Dexheimer JW; Zahner J; Burrows EK; Chatburn R; Messinger A; Baker CD; Schuler CL; Benscoter D; Amin R; Pajor N
    Pediatr Pulmonol; 2023 Feb; 58(2):433-440. PubMed ID: 36226360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. FAIRifying a Quality Registry Using OMOP CDM: Challenges and Solutions.
    Puttmann D; De Keizer N; Cornet R; Van Der Zwan E; Bakhshi-Raiez F
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2022 May; 294():367-371. PubMed ID: 35612098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Making work visible for electronic phenotype implementation: Lessons learned from the eMERGE network.
    Shang N; Liu C; Rasmussen LV; Ta CN; Caroll RJ; Benoit B; Lingren T; Dikilitas O; Mentch FD; Carrell DS; Wei WQ; Luo Y; Gainer VS; Kullo IJ; Pacheco JA; Hakonarson H; Walunas TL; Denny JC; Wiley K; Murphy SN; Hripcsak G; Weng C
    J Biomed Inform; 2019 Nov; 99():103293. PubMed ID: 31542521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Genomic Common Data Model for Seamless Interoperation of Biomedical Data in Clinical Practice: Retrospective Study.
    Shin SJ; You SC; Park YR; Roh J; Kim JH; Haam S; Reich CG; Blacketer C; Son DS; Oh S; Park RW
    J Med Internet Res; 2019 Mar; 21(3):e13249. PubMed ID: 30912749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.