These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33028009)
1. Short-Term Foreshocks as Key Information for Mainshock Timing and Rupture: The M Papadopoulos GA; Agalos A; Minadakis G; Triantafyllou I; Krassakis P Sensors (Basel); 2020 Oct; 20(19):. PubMed ID: 33028009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Pawnee earthquake as a result of the interplay among injection, faults and foreshocks. Chen X; Nakata N; Pennington C; Haffener J; Chang JC; He X; Zhan Z; Ni S; Walter JI Sci Rep; 2017 Jul; 7(1):4945. PubMed ID: 28694472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Nucleation and Cascade Features of Earthquake Mainshock Statistically Explored from Foreshock Seismicity. Kamogawa M; Nanjo KZ; Izutsu J; Orihara Y; Nagao T; Uyeda S Entropy (Basel); 2019 Apr; 21(4):. PubMed ID: 33267135 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The debate on the prognostic value of earthquake foreshocks: a meta-analysis. Mignan A Sci Rep; 2014 Feb; 4():4099. PubMed ID: 24526224 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Properties of foreshocks and aftershocks of the nonconservative self-organized critical Olami-Feder-Christensen model. Helmstetter A; Hergarten S; Sornette D Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2004 Oct; 70(4 Pt 2):046120. PubMed ID: 15600473 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Seismic and Aseismic Fault Slip During the Initiation Phase of the 2017 Caballero E; Chounet A; Duputel Z; Jara J; Twardzik C; Jolivet R Geophys Res Lett; 2021 Mar; 48(6):e2020GL091916. PubMed ID: 33867597 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rare Occurrences of Non-cascading Foreshock Activity in Southern California. Moutote L; Marsan D; Lengliné O; Duputel Z Geophys Res Lett; 2021 Apr; 48(7):e2020GL091757. PubMed ID: 34219839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Propagation of slow slip leading up to the 2011 M(w) 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Kato A; Obara K; Igarashi T; Tsuruoka H; Nakagawa S; Hirata N Science; 2012 Feb; 335(6069):705-8. PubMed ID: 22267578 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Implications of fault constitutive properties for earthquake prediction. Dieterich JH; Kilgore B Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 1996 Apr; 93(9):3787-94. PubMed ID: 11607666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The 2016 Kumamoto earthquake sequence. Kato A; Nakamura K; Hiyama Y Proc Jpn Acad Ser B Phys Biol Sci; 2016; 92(8):358-371. PubMed ID: 27725474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The Relevance of Foreshocks in Earthquake Triggering: A Statistical Study. Lippiello E; Godano C; de Arcangelis L Entropy (Basel); 2019 Feb; 21(2):. PubMed ID: 33266889 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Irregular rupture process of the 2022 Taitung, Taiwan, earthquake sequence. Yagi Y; Okuwaki R; Enescu B; Lu J Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):1107. PubMed ID: 36670137 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The source parameters, surface deformation and tectonic setting of three recent earthquakes: thessalonki (Greece), tabas-e-golshan (iran) and carlisle (u.k.). King G; Soufleris C; Berberian M Disasters; 1981 Mar; 5(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 20958479 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gradual unlocking of plate boundary controlled initiation of the 2014 Iquique earthquake. Schurr B; Asch G; Hainzl S; Bedford J; Hoechner A; Palo M; Wang R; Moreno M; Bartsch M; Zhang Y; Oncken O; Tilmann F; Dahm T; Victor P; Barrientos S; Vilotte JP Nature; 2014 Aug; 512(7514):299-302. PubMed ID: 25119049 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Strike-slip 23 January 2018 M Krabbenhoeft A; von Huene R; Miller JJ; Lange D; Vera F Sci Rep; 2018 Sep; 8(1):13706. PubMed ID: 30209262 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fault stress inversion reveals seismogenic asperity of the 2011 Mw 9.0 Tohoku-Oki earthquake. Xie Z; Cai Y; Wang CY; Yoshioka S; Tanaka M Sci Rep; 2019 Aug; 9(1):11987. PubMed ID: 31427652 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]