These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

154 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33028188)

  • 21. Genome-wide association study and accuracy of genomic prediction for teat number in Duroc pigs using genotyping-by-sequencing.
    Tan C; Wu Z; Ren J; Huang Z; Liu D; He X; Prakapenka D; Zhang R; Li N; Da Y; Hu X
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Mar; 49(1):35. PubMed ID: 28356075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The impact of training on data from genetically-related lines on the accuracy of genomic predictions for feed efficiency traits in pigs.
    Aliakbari A; Delpuech E; Labrune Y; Riquet J; Gilbert H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Oct; 52(1):57. PubMed ID: 33028194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Accuracy of Predicted Genomic Breeding Values in Purebred and Crossbred Pigs.
    Hidalgo AM; Bastiaansen JW; Lopes MS; Harlizius B; Groenen MA; de Koning DJ
    G3 (Bethesda); 2015 May; 5(8):1575-83. PubMed ID: 26019187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effect of genomic selection and genotyping strategy on estimation of variance components in animal models using different relationship matrices.
    Wang L; Janss LL; Madsen P; Henshall J; Huang CH; Marois D; Alemu S; Sørensen AC; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Jun; 52(1):31. PubMed ID: 32527317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models.
    Lourenco DA; Misztal I; Wang H; Aguilar I; Tsuruta S; Bertrand JK
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Sep; 91(9):4090-8. PubMed ID: 23893997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Benefits of testing in both bio-secure and production environments in genomic selection breeding programs for commercial broiler chicken.
    Chu TT; Alemu SW; Norberg E; Sørensen AC; Henshall J; Hawken R; Jensen J
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Nov; 50(1):52. PubMed ID: 30390619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Optimized grouping to increase accuracy of prediction of breeding values based on group records in genomic selection breeding programs.
    Chu TT; Bastiaansen JWM; Berg P; Komen H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2019 Nov; 51(1):64. PubMed ID: 31730478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Assessment of relationships between pigs based on pedigree and genomic information.
    Zhang J; Song H; Zhang Q; Ding X
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):697-705. PubMed ID: 31708004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A predictive assessment of genetic correlations between traits in chickens using markers.
    Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhy A; Esmailizadeh A; Fozi MA; Kranis A; Valente BD; Rosa GJ; Gianola D
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Feb; 49(1):16. PubMed ID: 28148241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Genomic prediction in hybrid breeding: II. Reciprocal recurrent genomic selection with full-sib and half-sib families.
    Melchinger AE; Frisch M
    Theor Appl Genet; 2023 Aug; 136(9):203. PubMed ID: 37653062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Metafounder approach for single-step genomic evaluations of Red Dairy cattle.
    Kudinov AA; Mäntysaari EA; Aamand GP; Uimari P; Strandén I
    J Dairy Sci; 2020 Jul; 103(7):6299-6310. PubMed ID: 32418688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effect of the H
    Martini JWR; Schrauf MF; Garcia-Baccino CA; Pimentel ECG; Munilla S; Rogberg-Muñoz A; Cantet RJC; Reimer C; Gao N; Wimmer V; Simianer H
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Apr; 50(1):16. PubMed ID: 29653506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Performance of pedigree and various forms of marker-derived relationship coefficients in genomic prediction and their correlations.
    Solaymani S; Ayatollahi Mehrgardi A; Esmailizadeh A; Tusell L; Momen M
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2020 Sep; 137(5):423-437. PubMed ID: 32003127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Genomic selection in a pig population including information from slaughtered full sibs of boars within a sib-testing program.
    Samorè AB; Buttazzoni L; Gallo M; Russo V; Fontanesi L
    Animal; 2015 May; 9(5):750-9. PubMed ID: 25510405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Bayesian Genomic Prediction with Genotype × Environment Interaction Kernel Models.
    Cuevas J; Crossa J; Montesinos-López OA; Burgueño J; Pérez-Rodríguez P; de Los Campos G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Jan; 7(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 27793970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Bias and accuracy of dairy sheep evaluations using BLUP and SSGBLUP with metafounders and unknown parent groups.
    Macedo FL; Christensen OF; Astruc JM; Aguilar I; Masuda Y; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 Aug; 52(1):47. PubMed ID: 32787772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improving accuracy of direct and maternal genetic effects in genomic evaluations using pooled boar semen: a simulation study1.
    Maiorano AM; Assen A; Bijma P; Chen CY; Silva JAIV; Herring WO; Tsuruta S; Misztal I; Lourenco DAL
    J Anim Sci; 2019 Jul; 97(8):3237-3245. PubMed ID: 31240314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Empirical comparison between different methods for genomic prediction of number of piglets born alive in moderate sized breeding populations.
    Fangmann A; Sharifi RA; Heinkel J; Danowski K; Schrade H; Erbe M; Simianer H
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Apr; 95(4):1434-1443. PubMed ID: 28464085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Genomic Relatedness Strengthens Genetic Connectedness Across Management Units.
    Yu H; Spangler ML; Lewis RM; Morota G
    G3 (Bethesda); 2017 Oct; 7(10):3543-3556. PubMed ID: 28860185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sire evaluation for total number born in pigs using a genomic reaction norms approach.
    Silva FF; Mulder HA; Knol EF; Lopes MS; Guimarães SE; Lopes PS; Mathur PK; Viana JM; Bastiaansen JW
    J Anim Sci; 2014 Sep; 92(9):3825-34. PubMed ID: 24492557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.