These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33029429)
21. What are the Benefits and Harms of Ureteroscopy Compared with Shock-wave Lithotripsy in the Treatment of Upper Ureteral Stones? A Systematic Review. Drake T; Grivas N; Dabestani S; Knoll T; Lam T; Maclennan S; Petrik A; Skolarikos A; Straub M; Tuerk C; Yuan CY; Sarica K Eur Urol; 2017 Nov; 72(5):772-786. PubMed ID: 28456350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Outcome analysis of holmium laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic management of lower ureteric calculus in pediatric patients: a prospective study. Jhanwar A; Bansal A; Sankhwar S; Kumar M; Kanodia G; Prakash G Int Braz J Urol; 2016; 42(6):1178-1182. PubMed ID: 27622283 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Treatment of ureteral stones: A prospective randomized controlled trial on comparison of Ho:YAG laser and pneumatic lithotripsy. Maghsoudi R; Amjadi M; Norizadeh D; Hassanzadeh H Indian J Urol; 2008 Jul; 24(3):352-4. PubMed ID: 19468467 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Laser and pneumatic lithotripsy in the endoscopic management of large ureteric stones: a comparative study. Kassem A; Elfayoumy H; Elsaied W; Elgammal M; Bedair A Urol Int; 2012; 88(3):311-5. PubMed ID: 22441150 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of previous SWL on ureterorenoscopy outcomes and optimal timing for ureterorenoscopy after SWL failure in proximal ureteral stones. Irer B; Sahin MO; Erbatu O; Yildiz A; Ongun S; Cinar O; Cihan A; Sahin M; Sen V; Ucer O; Kizilay F; Bozkurt O; World J Urol; 2020 Mar; 38(3):769-774. PubMed ID: 31098658 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Flexible ureterorenoscopy (F-URS) with holmium laser versus extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for treatment of renal stone <2 cm: a meta-analysis. Mi Y; Ren K; Pan H; Zhu L; Wu S; You X; Shao H; Dai F; Peng T; Qin F; Wang J; Huang Y Urolithiasis; 2016 Aug; 44(4):353-65. PubMed ID: 26530230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Safety and efficacy of using the stone cone and an entrapment and extraction device in ureteroscopic lithotripsy for ureteric stones. Shabana W; Teleb M; Dawod T Arab J Urol; 2015 Jun; 13(2):75-9. PubMed ID: 26413324 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Pneumatic Lithotripsy versus Holmium Laser Lithotripsy in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy for Patients with Guy's Stone Score Grade IV Kidney Stone. Hong Y; Lin H; Yang Q; Zhou D; Hou G; Chen X; Zheng J Urol Int; 2021; 105(1-2):45-51. PubMed ID: 32829337 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Emergency extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy as opposed to delayed shockwave lithotripsy for the treatment of acute renal colic due to obstructive ureteral stone: a prospective randomized trial. Bucci S; Umari P; Rizzo M; Pavan N; Liguori G; Barbone F; Trombetta C Minerva Urol Nefrol; 2018 Oct; 70(5):526-533. PubMed ID: 29761687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. TREATMENT OF DISTAL URETERIC STONES-COMPARATIVE EFFICACY OF TRANSURETERAL PNEUMATIC LITHOTRIPSY AND EXTRACORPOREAL SHOCK WAVE LITHOTRIPSY. Wazir BG; Orakzai AN; Nawaz A J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2015; 27(1):140-2. PubMed ID: 26182760 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Cost analysis of ureteroscopy (URS) vs extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy (ESWL) in the management of ureteric stones <10 mm in adults: a UK perspective. Constanti M; Calvert RC; Thomas K; Dickinson A; Carlisle S BJU Int; 2020 Mar; 125(3):457-466. PubMed ID: 31663246 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]