169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33030262)
1. Meta-analysis of retroperitoneal vs transperitoneal laparoscopic and robot-assisted pyeloplasty for the management of pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Chua ME; Ming JM; Kim JK; Milford KL; Silangcruz JM; Ren L; Rickard M; Lorenzo AJ
BJU Int; 2021 Jun; 127(6):687-702. PubMed ID: 33030262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative efficacy and safety of different minimal invasive pyeloplasty in treating patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a network meta-analysis.
Li P; Ma Y; Jin X; Xiang L; Li H; Wang K
World J Urol; 2023 Oct; 41(10):2659-2669. PubMed ID: 37566142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Meta-analysis of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of laparoscopic pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Wu Y; Dong Q; Han P; Liu L; Wang L; Wei Q
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2012 Sep; 22(7):658-62. PubMed ID: 22731801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children: Randomized clinical trial.
Badawy H; Zoaier A; Ghoneim T; Hanno A
J Pediatr Urol; 2015 Jun; 11(3):122.e1-6. PubMed ID: 25979219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Vascular hitch for paediatric pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction with crossing vessels: institutional analysis and systematic review with meta-analysis.
Kim JK; Keefe DT; Rickard M; Milford K; Lorenzo AJ; Chua ME
BJU Int; 2022 Jun; 129(6):679-687. PubMed ID: 33463000
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Peri-operative outcomes and complications after laparoscopic vs robot-assisted dismembered pyeloplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Light A; Karthikeyan S; Maruthan S; Elhage O; Danuser H; Dasgupta P
BJU Int; 2018 Aug; 122(2):181-194. PubMed ID: 29453902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Transperitoneal left laparoscopic pyeloplasty with transmesocolic access to the pelvi-ureteric junction: technique description and results with a minimum follow-up of 1 year.
Porpiglia F; Billia M; Volpe A; Morra I; Scarpa RM
BJU Int; 2008 Apr; 101(8):1024-8. PubMed ID: 18070175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Retroperitoneal Robotic-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty: A 10 Year Experience in a Single Institution.
Whiting D; Whitehurst L; Tsang D; Hussain M; Malki M; Barber N
J Endourol; 2022 May; 36(5):615-619. PubMed ID: 34931543
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Standard vs mini-laparoscopic pyeloplasty: perioperative outcomes and cosmetic results.
Fiori C; Morra I; Bertolo R; Mele F; Chiarissi ML; Porpiglia F
BJU Int; 2013 Mar; 111(3 Pt B):E121-6. PubMed ID: 22788958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robot-assisted and laparoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Autorino R; Eden C; El-Ghoneimi A; Guazzoni G; Buffi N; Peters CA; Stein RJ; Gettman M
Eur Urol; 2014 Feb; 65(2):430-52. PubMed ID: 23856037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal approaches of pyeloplasty in management of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A meta-analysis.
Song P; Shu M; Peng Z; Yang L; Zhou M; Wang Z; Lu N; Pei C; Dong Q
Asian J Surg; 2022 Jan; 45(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 33867239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Laparoscopic and robot-assisted ureterocalicostomy for treatment of primary and recurrent pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction in children: a multicenter comparative study with laparoscopic and robot-assisted Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty.
Esposito C; Blanc T; Patkowski D; Lopez PJ; Masieri L; Spinoit AF; Escolino M
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Oct; 54(10):2503-2509. PubMed ID: 35861906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of open and laparoscopic pyeloplasty in ureteropelvic junction obstruction surgery: report of 49 cases.
Umari P; Lissiani A; Trombetta C; Belgrano E
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2011 Dec; 83(4):169-74. PubMed ID: 22670313
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cost-effective laparoscopic pyeloplasty: single center experience.
Hemal AK; Goel R; Goel A
Int J Urol; 2003 Nov; 10(11):563-8. PubMed ID: 14633078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotic Anderson-Hynes pyeloplasty: 5-year experience of one centre.
Schwentner C; Pelzer A; Neururer R; Springer B; Horninger W; Bartsch G; Peschel R
BJU Int; 2007 Oct; 100(4):880-5. PubMed ID: 17535275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Global minimally invasive pyeloplasty study in children: Results from the Pediatric Urology Expert Group of the European Association of Urology Young Academic Urologists working party.
Silay MS; Spinoit AF; Undre S; Fiala V; Tandogdu Z; Garmanova T; Guttilla A; Sancaktutar AA; Haid B; Waldert M; Goyal A; Serefoglu EC; Baldassarre E; Manzoni G; Radford A; Subramaniam R; Cherian A; Hoebeke P; Jacobs M; Rocco B; Yuriy R; Zattoni F; Kocvara R; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2016 Aug; 12(4):229.e1-7. PubMed ID: 27346071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robotic computer-assisted pyeloplasty versus conventional laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Weise ES; Winfield HN
J Endourol; 2006 Oct; 20(10):813-9. PubMed ID: 17094760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A prospective randomised comparison between the transperitoneal and retroperitoneoscopic approaches for robotic-assisted pyeloplasty in a single surgeon, single centre study.
Khoder WY; Waidelich R; Ghamdi AMA; Schulz T; Becker A; Stief CG
J Robot Surg; 2018 Mar; 12(1):131-137. PubMed ID: 28534190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Meta-analysis of robot-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic and open pyeloplasty in children.
Cundy TP; Harling L; Hughes-Hallett A; Mayer EK; Najmaldin AS; Athanasiou T; Yang GZ; Darzi A
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):582-94. PubMed ID: 25383399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
