BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

910 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33030440)

  • 1. Implementation of Electronic Informed Consent in Biomedical Research and Stakeholders' Perspectives: Systematic Review.
    De Sutter E; Zaçe D; Boccia S; Di Pietro ML; Geerts D; Borry P; Huys I
    J Med Internet Res; 2020 Oct; 22(10):e19129. PubMed ID: 33030440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Influence of Web-Based Tools on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in Pregnant Adolescents or Adolescent Mothers: Mixed Methods Systematic Review.
    Wu JJY; Ahmad N; Samuel M; Logan S; Mattar CNZ
    J Med Internet Res; 2021 Aug; 23(8):e26786. PubMed ID: 34435961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stakeholder Perspectives of Clinical Artificial Intelligence Implementation: Systematic Review of Qualitative Evidence.
    Hogg HDJ; Al-Zubaidy M; ; Talks J; Denniston AK; Kelly CJ; Malawana J; Papoutsi C; Teare MD; Keane PA; Beyer FR; Maniatopoulos G
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Jan; 25():e39742. PubMed ID: 36626192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reporting of Ethical Considerations in Qualitative Research Utilizing Social Media Data on Public Health Care: Scoping Review.
    Zhang Y; Fu J; Lai J; Deng S; Guo Z; Zhong C; Tang J; Cao W; Wu Y
    J Med Internet Res; 2024 May; 26():e51496. PubMed ID: 38758590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Approaches to Research Ethics in Health Research on YouTube: Systematic Review.
    Tanner JP; Takats C; Lathan HS; Kwan A; Wormer R; Romero D; Jones HE
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Oct; 25():e43060. PubMed ID: 37792443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Electronic consenting for conducting research remotely: A review of current practice and key recommendations for using e-consenting.
    Skelton E; Drey N; Rutherford M; Ayers S; Malamateniou C
    Int J Med Inform; 2020 Nov; 143():104271. PubMed ID: 32979650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Inadequacy of ethical conduct and reporting of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: Results from a systematic review.
    Taljaard M; Hemming K; Shah L; Giraudeau B; Grimshaw JM; Weijer C
    Clin Trials; 2017 Aug; 14(4):333-341. PubMed ID: 28393537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Participant comprehension of research for which they volunteer: a systematic review.
    Montalvo W; Larson E
    J Nurs Scholarsh; 2014 Nov; 46(6):423-31. PubMed ID: 25130209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Barriers to and Facilitators of Engagement With Remote Measurement Technology for Managing Health: Systematic Review and Content Analysis of Findings.
    Simblett S; Greer B; Matcham F; Curtis H; Polhemus A; Ferrão J; Gamble P; Wykes T
    J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jul; 20(7):e10480. PubMed ID: 30001997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Influence of Sex, Gender, or Age on Outcomes of Digital Technologies for Treatment and Monitoring of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: Protocol for an Overview of Systematic Reviews.
    Matthias K; Honekamp I; De Santis KK
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2022 Oct; 11(10):e40538. PubMed ID: 36222803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Informed consent in dental care and research for the older adult population: A systematic review.
    Mukherjee A; Livinski AA; Millum J; Chamut S; Boroumand S; Iafolla TJ; Adesanya MR; Dye BA
    J Am Dent Assoc; 2017 Apr; 148(4):211-220. PubMed ID: 28065430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Electronic informed consent criteria for research ethics review: a scoping review.
    Yusof MYPM; Teo CH; Ng CJ
    BMC Med Ethics; 2022 Nov; 23(1):117. PubMed ID: 36414962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Blockchain-Based Dynamic Consent and its Applications for Patient-Centric Research and Health Information Sharing: Protocol for an Integrative Review.
    Charles WM; van der Waal MB; Flach J; Bisschop A; van der Waal RX; Es-Sbai H; McLeod CJ
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2024 Feb; 13():e50339. PubMed ID: 38315514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer-Based Decision Tools for Shared Therapeutic Decision-making in Oncology: Systematic Review.
    Yung A; Kay J; Beale P; Gibson KA; Shaw T
    JMIR Cancer; 2021 Oct; 7(4):e31616. PubMed ID: 34544680
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.
    Martinengo L; Yeo NJY; Tang ZQ; Markandran KD; Kyaw BM; Tudor Car L
    JMIR Res Protoc; 2019 Mar; 8(3):e12488. PubMed ID: 30907743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
    American Society of Clinical Oncology
    J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ethical and Methodological Considerations of Twitter Data for Public Health Research: Systematic Review.
    Takats C; Kwan A; Wormer R; Goldman D; Jones HE; Romero D
    J Med Internet Res; 2022 Nov; 24(11):e40380. PubMed ID: 36445739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Testing and Practical Implementation of a User-Friendly Personalized and Long-Term Electronic Informed Consent Prototype in Clinical Research: Mixed Methods Study.
    De Sutter E; Geerts D; Yskout K; Verreydt S; Borry P; Barbier L; Huys I
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e46306. PubMed ID: 38113088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Benefits and Disadvantages of Electronic Patient-reported Outcome Measures: Systematic Review.
    Meirte J; Hellemans N; Anthonissen M; Denteneer L; Maertens K; Moortgat P; Van Daele U
    JMIR Perioper Med; 2020 Apr; 3(1):e15588. PubMed ID: 33393920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Intervention Now to Eliminate Repeat Unintended Pregnancy in Teenagers (INTERUPT): a systematic review of intervention effectiveness and cost-effectiveness, and qualitative and realist synthesis of implementation factors and user engagement.
    Whitaker R; Hendry M; Aslam R; Booth A; Carter B; Charles JM; Craine N; Tudor Edwards R; Noyes J; Ives Ntambwe L; Pasterfield D; Rycroft-Malone J; Williams N
    Health Technol Assess; 2016 Feb; 20(16):1-214. PubMed ID: 26931051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 46.